Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 3, 2024, 6:46 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If free will was not real
RE: If free will was not real
(July 28, 2016 at 10:35 pm)Jehanne Wrote:
(July 27, 2016 at 11:07 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: What?!


I think consciousness isn't a mystery at all and is already explained, at some level, by what we already know about the brain. It's simply a set of functions of the brain, I believe, something evolution built into us to be better able to survive. That we make much ado about nothing, is simply a side-effect.

Sean Carroll is a compatibilist; he seems like a nice guy, a good atheist.

Lmao, what are you talking about, for the third time in a row now?
Reply
RE: If free will was not real
(July 29, 2016 at 3:55 am)quip Wrote:
(July 28, 2016 at 11:26 pm)bennyboy Wrote: "will" is the capacity of a sentient agent to realize intent-- for example, I don't really know how to "move" a leg-- I want it to move, and it moves.

Then the will falls under the constraint of intended realization.  Moreover, are your intentions freely wrought? How can any of this be considered free?
Intentions are of the self-- feelings, memories, personality, etc. I don't think it makes sense to categorize them as "free" any more than it does to categorize my foot as free. It is the capacity, once the intent is in place, to REALIZE it which I call will. Ans since will is the bridge between intent and its physical expression, any physical impediment or obstacle to the expression of intent limits its freedom.

Quote:Your argument is akin to a man held within a cell proclaiming that he holds the willful capacity to freely move about his environs all for the effort of denying his ambient constraints.

At best....it's superficial.
It might seem superficial until you don't have free will. If you are compelled or blocked from making decisions and acting on them, freedom will be real enough concept for you, I'm sure.
Reply
RE: If free will was not real
(July 29, 2016 at 4:15 am)bennyboy Wrote:
(July 29, 2016 at 3:55 am)quip Wrote: Then the will falls under the constraint of intended realization.  Moreover, are your intentions freely wrought? How can any of this be considered free?
Intentions are of the self-- feelings, memories, personality, etc.  I don't think it makes sense to categorize them as "free" any more than it does to categorize my foot as free. 

Then don't introduce intention as a supporting argument for free-will.  Senselessness.  Undecided
Quote:
Quote:Your argument is akin to a man held within a cell proclaiming that he holds the willful capacity to freely move about his environs all for the effort of denying his ambient constraints.

At best....it's superficial.
It might seem superficial until you don't have free will.  If you are compelled or blocked from making decisions and acting on them, freedom will be real enough concept for you, I'm sure.

The will is quite significant...the bland assertion that it's free...well, not so much.
Reply
RE: If free will was not real
(July 29, 2016 at 4:21 am)quip Wrote:
(July 29, 2016 at 4:15 am)bennyboy Wrote: Intentions are of the self-- feelings, memories, personality, etc.  I don't think it makes sense to categorize them as "free" any more than it does to categorize my foot as free. 

Then don't introduce intention as a supporting argument for free-will.  Senselessness.  Undecided

Intention isn't a supporting argument for free will. Will is the expression of intent. Free will is the expression of intent unfettered by obstacles or compulsions from the world outside the acting agent.
Reply
RE: If free will was not real
There are many obstacles to the will though.
Reply
RE: If free will was not real
(July 29, 2016 at 5:52 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: There are many obstacles to the will though.

No doubt.  Sometimes the will is not free.  For example, except among very exceptional people, the intent to get away from extreme pain is absolutely dictated by external sources.
Reply
RE: If free will was not real
You sound like a compatabilist, compatabilist free will is real.
Reply
RE: If free will was not real
(July 28, 2016 at 3:50 pm)RozKek Wrote:



And it doesn't matter whether you like it or not, whether it's an interesting view of reality, if it's true it's true. And when you evaluate and something seems good to your nature even the process of that evaluation isn't ultimately your decision, it was either partly random or bound to happen exactly the way it happened.

Well then, if you agree that you cannot break the causal chain, problem solved. All your intentions, actions, desires and such are a part of the causal chain and you cannot do anything to do otherwise but you can imagine different things to do. However even those imaginations i.e what you'll imagine would also be a part of that causal chain, in other words not under your control ultimately speaking.

I gather, from your post, and a number of posts from others, that what is being expounded on here, is that choices are entirely a mechanistic process brought about by physical forces within the brain.   That given X in you will get Y out (with a  very complicated equation in between).   Wouldn't this also apply to any logic or rational you are using to determine this?   If what you are saying is true, then it would seem that you also have to free will to say whether yours or benny's logic is right or wrong.  Or that you can say it, but have no way to determine if one is more correct than the other.  Would you agree?
Reply
RE: If free will was not real
(July 29, 2016 at 7:01 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: You sound like a compatabilist, compatabilist free will is real.

Given a physical universe and nothing more, I'm a compatibilist.  But EVEN IF there were a transdimensional, magical soul, I don't think "free will" could mean "free from causality."  Whatever the self is, whether we fully understand it or not, it almost surely is part of a causal process-- unless it is eternal, which is another argument entirely. Now, I'm not making any argument about soul or anything-- I'm just saying that my view on free will pretty much works either way.

Right now, the popular view at least here is the physical monism.  In that context, I'd say yeah I'm pretty close to Dennett or someone like that.
Reply
RE: If free will was not real
I can't not believe in compatabilst free will, and I can't believe in incompatabilist free will.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Hypothetically, science proves free will isn't real henryp 95 14368 July 12, 2016 at 7:00 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  If Hell is Not Real Rayaan 36 17076 March 20, 2011 at 9:56 pm
Last Post: OnlyNatural



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)