(August 15, 2016 at 5:52 am)Arkilogue Wrote:

(August 15, 2016 at 5:49 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: Hmmm... Are you high on something right now, or is your brain this f*cked up for good?...  

Do you have a specific inquiry or is this attempted performance art?

You're a guy/gal on the internet who spouts complete nonsense about how particle physics explains the afterlife, and claims that (s)he can remote-view while being unconscious. How much respect did you expect?
By this point, everyone probably hopes for your sake that you are just trolling.

(August 15, 2016 at 5:53 am)chimp3 Wrote:

(August 15, 2016 at 5:39 am)Arkilogue Wrote:

---

It would have to be local. Never got into "remote viewing".  The specific experiment was a photo on the top of a dresser that I was not shone but could see if i were to look down from the ceiling.  So I would pop out of body and travel up there to report what I saw. It was not 100% correct meaning what I saw was not exact to the photo. Where there was a girl with a blue sweater being hugged from behind by another girl, I saw a two-headed blue skinned girl.

I hope you realize that I am not compelled to believe you. Have you ever considered the James Randi Challenge? There is a million dollars waiting just for you.

I'm not asking you to. Looks like the challenge has been terminated. http://web.randi.org/the-million-dollar-challenge.html

(August 15, 2016 at 5:52 am)Arkilogue Wrote: Do you have a specific inquiry or is this attempted performance art?

More of a general observation. You speak in a manner of a crazy person - you use scientific terms, like they're magic spells - fancy sounding gibberish, that's supposed to intimidate and distract from the fact, that nothing you're saying has any basis in fact.

I hope you're just high, because drugs are fun. I'm sorry if you're simply nuts and really believe you're making sense...

(August 15, 2016 at 5:55 am)Alex K Wrote:

(August 15, 2016 at 5:52 am)Arkilogue Wrote: Do you have a specific inquiry or is this attempted performance art?

You're a guy/gal on the internet who spouts complete nonsense about how particle physics explains the afterlife, and claims that (s)he can remote-view while being unconscious. How much respect did you expect?
By this point, everyone probably hopes for your sake that you are just trolling.

I'm not asking you for respect, but I do hope you can come up with more creative ad hominems while we get to know each other

(August 15, 2016 at 6:01 am)Arkilogue Wrote:

(August 15, 2016 at 5:55 am)Alex K Wrote: You're a guy/gal on the internet who spouts complete nonsense about how particle physics explains the afterlife, and claims that (s)he can remote-view while being unconscious. How much respect did you expect?
By this point, everyone probably hopes for your sake that you are just trolling.

I'm not asking you for respect, but I do hope you can come up with more creative ad hominems while we get to know each other  

Your father was a hamster, and your mother smelt of elderberries!

(August 15, 2016 at 6:00 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(August 15, 2016 at 5:52 am)Arkilogue Wrote: Do you have a specific inquiry or is this attempted performance art?

More of a general observation. You speak in a manner of a crazy person - you use scientific terms, like they're magic spells - fancy sounding gibberish, that's supposed to intimidate and distract from the fact, that nothing you're saying has any basis in fact.

I hope you're just high, because drugs are fun. I'm sorry if you're simply nuts and really believe you're making sense...

Do you consider acceptable the standard model of particle physics and plausible the modern scientific measure of 5 times more gravitational influence from some other matter/existence/realm that overlaps our but does not directly interact with our matter? Is that all crazy stuff too? Every new scientific breakthrough is "crazy" to the paradigm it replaces.

But hey, life is a great journey and I'm all for making sense in the native languages. Stick around, I might learn a thing or two.

(August 15, 2016 at 5:22 am)Arkilogue Wrote: I have been able to OBE at will and confirm the composure of pictures hidden out of site by others.

The brain is objectively/mechanically a receiver of consciousness, not a generator.

The ability to think and feel is electromagnetic in nature and that is not only a fundamental force of the universe but also infinite in range.

Sounds like you need another dealer to sell you a better stuff.

(August 15, 2016 at 6:09 am)Arkilogue Wrote:

(August 15, 2016 at 6:00 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: More of a general observation. You speak in a manner of a crazy person - you use scientific terms, like they're magic spells - fancy sounding gibberish, that's supposed to intimidate and distract from the fact, that nothing you're saying has any basis in fact.

I hope you're just high, because drugs are fun. I'm sorry if you're simply nuts and really believe you're making sense...

Do you consider acceptable the standard model of particle physics and plausible the modern scientific measure of 5 times more gravitational influence from some other matter/existence/realm that overlaps our but does not directly interact with our matter? Is that all crazy stuff too? Every new scientific breakthrough is "crazy" to the paradigm it replaces.

But hey, life is a great journey and I'm all for making sense in the native languages.  Stick around, I might learn a thing or two.

No, Dark Matter is not considered crazy. There is multiple evidence for Dark Matter and there are very simple and plausible ways to explain it. There is no comparable plausibility or any evidence for afterlife claims. Just because science has open questions, that doesn't mean your toy fantasy is real.

(August 15, 2016 at 6:04 am)Alex K Wrote:

(August 15, 2016 at 6:01 am)Arkilogue Wrote: I'm not asking you for respect, but I do hope you can come up with more creative ad hominems while we get to know each other  

Your father was a hamster, and your mother smelt of elderberries!

You can do better than repetition! Thou art a flat minded, borborygmus dompteuse of puny stature! Hah!

---

(August 15, 2016 at 6:09 am)Atheist_BG Wrote:

(August 15, 2016 at 5:22 am)Arkilogue Wrote: I have been able to OBE at will and confirm the composure of pictures hidden out of site by others.

The brain is objectively/mechanically a receiver of consciousness, not a generator.

The ability to think and feel is electromagnetic in nature and that is not only a fundamental force of the universe but also infinite in range.

Sounds like you need another dealer to sell you a better stuff.

Which or your sensory inputs that tell you, you exist, is self generated and not from stimuli external to the brain?

Of the 4 fundamental forces, are you asserting that either gravity, the weak or the strong nuclear force is the conveyance of the experience of consciousnesses in the physical body, rather than magnetism?

---

(August 15, 2016 at 6:12 am)Alex K Wrote: No, Dark Matter is not considered crazy. There is multiple evidence for Dark Matter and there are very simple and plausible ways to explain it. There is no comparable plausibility or any evidence for afterlife claims. Just because science has open questions, that doesn't mean your toy fantasy is real.

Can you explain dark matter simply and plausibly to me?

Arkilouge, many people hate the idea of God, even if they have the doubts regarding his existance.

You have to give up your pride, most earthly pleasures, to tremble before God and care for the people you dont wish to care if it wasnt for hell and heaven.

Even if supernatural will be proven as a fact in the future, which will trigger even more doubts regarding the existing supernatural being like God, there still will be people who will hate such ideas, as it put them in to the miserable position of servant.