(September 24, 2016 at 12:53 am)Losty Wrote: Oh honey you do not want to start a bitch contest with me today. Any other day fine....not today.

That is okay with me, considering that I am in a bitch contest with someone at work who think's she is Queen.

Very interesting. Article says a computer took a ton of male and female faces and created a gender neutral composite, people altered the shading.

(September 24, 2016 at 12:55 am)Maelstrom Wrote:

(September 24, 2016 at 12:53 am)Losty Wrote: Oh honey you do not want to start a bitch contest with me today. Any other day fine....not today.

That is okay with me, considering that I am in a bitch contest with someone at work who think's she is Queen.

Good plan. Have fun

(September 24, 2016 at 12:55 am)Arkilogue Wrote: Very interesting.  Article says a computer took a ton of male and female faces and created a gender neutral composite, people altered the shading.

I feel like they cheated because that face has no defined features at all. Most people have cheekbones

Perception and sexual dimorphism.

https://lihsianghsu.wordpress.com/2010/0...r-matters/

In a study by Richard Russell (2009), the issue is exposed by revealing the effects of contrast of human faces on the perception of gender. Emphasis is put specifically on the perceived facial dimorphism between men and women.

As Figure 1 shows, Russell used digital manipulation method by averaging male and female facial features to create an androgynous face, and then modified it by differentiating the levels of contrast between the picture on the left and the one on the right. Contrast enhancement was put especially on the skin color, the eye contours and the lips. The left image shows a face with lighter skin, darker eye contours and lips, while the right one shows a face with darker skin, lighter eye contours and lips. Even though the face is the same in both pictures, Russell found people tended to see the left one showing a woman, while the right one showing a man. And an androgynous face can be made to appear as female and more attractive by increasing the facial contrast, while to appear male by decreasing the facial contrast.

The phenomenon is, according to Russell, resulting from the exaggeration of sexual dimorphism existing naturally between women and men, with women’s skin being lighter and female faces having greater contrast than men’s, as Russell has shown in this research. Russell explains that there is an underlying biological process in face perception guiding our identification of gender. The sex dimorphism of face contrast is more sharply marked by women’s use of cosmetics to enhance the expected female facial characteristics: applying eye shadow and gloss to draw out the regard and lips, using foundation and powder to smooth out the face and cover uneven skin coloration, etc. Specifically, the use of cosmetics is to “exaggerate a previously unknown sex difference in facial contrast,” as Russell demonstrates.

Nope. A woman who does not wear makeup is still a woman I recognize as a woman and not a male.

Also men don't look like women when they wear make-up, usually anyway there are some exceptions

(September 24, 2016 at 1:00 am)Maelstrom Wrote: Nope.  A woman who does not wear makeup is still a woman I recognize as a woman and not a male.

It's nothing to do with make up. It genuinely was a male.

(September 24, 2016 at 1:00 am)Maelstrom Wrote: Nope.  A woman who does not wear makeup is still a woman I recognize as a woman and not a male.

Right because of differing features...what if there are none?

(September 24, 2016 at 1:02 am)Arkilogue Wrote: Right because of differing features...what if there are none?

I can always tell.

I have been around the block once or twice with my life experience, and I am extremely observant.