What say you?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 7:12 am
Thread Rating:
A Question For The Xtian Drumpfucks.
|
Oh come on, he said that 11 years ago and it's perfectly OK because all guys talk like that, and all those women claiming he assaulted them are totally lying because that's what bitches do. Besides, he's found Jesus now so he's a fine, upstanding Christian unlike that heathen fornicator Bill Clinton.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
RE: A Question For The Xtian Drumpfucks.
October 27, 2016 at 2:49 pm
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2016 at 2:56 pm by Napoléon.)
(October 27, 2016 at 2:45 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: all those women claiming he assaulted them are totally lying because that's what bitches do. They are lying. It's already been proven as a blatant smear by people on Hillary's payroll. Hell the fucking timing of these women saying he groped them should be enough indication. I get it's the fashionable thing to bash Trump but lets at least be fair about it. If we're going to dismiss Bill Clinton's numerous fucking rape charges, which by the way are 100 times more compelling than any of this shite thrown at Trump, then we can at least do the same and dismiss it for him. And on the topic of it being OK or not, I don't think anyone's said what Trump said was. But hell, it is what guys talk like. Especially rich ones who can get away with whatever they want. I'd be more concerned if he was emailing classified information and prompting aides to bump people off, but apparently saying you can grab some pussy is worse.
The timing isn't suspicious at all. They came out when they felt people would actually believe them, rather than just call them liars (as Trump Supporters are doing now)
Donald Trump's an absolute scumbag. He's pro-sexual assault, he ran a scam university, he failed to pay some of his contractors, he's a misogynist, a racist, and has never done anything for anyone but himself in his life. His whole 'charity' (I use the term loosely as possible) is set up to benefit him. But no, let's worry about some emails. (October 27, 2016 at 3:31 pm)Divinity Wrote: The timing isn't suspicious at all. They came out when they felt people would actually believe them, rather than just call them liars (as Trump Supporters are doing now) No, no. Not suspicious at all. Less than a month before a presidential election? Do you actually believe this bullshit? Accusations debunked: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/...ald-trump/ Just take the most high profile one for an example: Quote:Jessica Leeds accused a young Donald Trump of groping her in first class on a flight from Dallas to New York City on Braniff Air in 1979. So we have an eye witness saying it didn't happen. A story that is literally implausible by her own details of the plane she was on. And her saying "she might have been okay with it if he kept his hands above her waist". What? Look at any of the other accusations and they're just as bullshit. But again, people don't give two shits about the fact Hillary's husband's a rapist? Am I just not conforming with the circle jerk here? Quote:Donald Trump's an absolute scumbag. So is Hillary Clinton. Quote: He's pro-sexual assault No he's not. Quote:, he ran a scam university Hillary runs a scam foundation. Quote:, he failed to pay some of his contractors What does this have to do with the price of bread? I might as well ask where all of Hillary's money came from, it's just as relevant. Quote:, he's a misogynist, a racist, and has never done anything for anyone but himself in his life. I'll give you the first, the second I don't believe, the third is outright bollocks. 1 example to refute: Where was Hillary while he was donating to victims of Hurricane Matthew? Quote: His whole 'charity' (I use the term loosely as possible) is set up to benefit him. What, like the Clinton foundation? Quote: But no, let's worry about some emails. Some emails. Calling for assassinations, rigging elections, outright complacency. Just some emails. Both candidates suck balls. If we're going to circle jerk let's at least get the facts right and be fair about it. RE: A Question For The Xtian Drumpfucks.
October 27, 2016 at 5:53 pm
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2016 at 6:16 pm by Minimalist.)
Quote:No, no. Not suspicious at all. Less than a month before a presidential election? That's when the Orange Fucktard started running his fucking mouth about that tape that HE RECORDED. See how that works? As soon as the fuckhead said that was just 'locker room talk' all the women that he groped came forward and said "no, it isn't." Here's another one from today. http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/he-grabb...s-finland/ Quote:‘He grabbed my butt’: Trump faces yet another accuser — Former Miss Finland I guess she just wants to get sued by the motherfucker, too?
Yeah, the last time I checked, armrests aren't armor ... how hard is it to slide your hand down off'n one into your neighbor's lap?
I've spent my fair share of time in locker rooms, and 'locker room talk' always seemed to be more along the lines of 'If you EVER tank a play like that again, I'll feed you your own bollocks' or 'Oi! who's got some Panadol?'
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
(October 27, 2016 at 6:14 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Yeah, the last time I checked, armrests aren't armor ... how hard is it to slide your hand down off'n one into your neighbor's lap? No dipshit, the point about the armrests is she said he lifted it up to grab her. On that type of plane the armrests don't go up, so the whole point is that her story is wrong from the start. (October 27, 2016 at 5:53 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:No, no. Not suspicious at all. Less than a month before a presidential election? So nothing to say on it being debunked you're just quoting more Hillary stooges? Thought you were smart Min. And let me tell you how it really works. They're either cashing in on the publicity or being paid by Hillary's associates to come forward with this garbage (the latter of which has been proven btw). But yes they're all genuine. Funny that we are far more scrupulous with Bill's accusers. Nobody want to address that fact either? |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)