Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 16, 2024, 12:03 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 23, 2016 at 8:17 am)The Joker Wrote:
Quote:Administrator Notice

Material plagiarised from https://answersingenesis.org/are-humans-...life-ob16/. If you're going to parrot Ken Ham, at least have the decency to cite the source.
-Stimbo

If someone is going to use Ken Ham as a source, I think it's appropriate that it was someone named The Joker.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Interesting how, for all his whining about atheists having no moral foundation, the only one here exhibiting a total lack of decency is him.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
He is a christard yearning to be a bigger moron, afterall
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 23, 2016 at 9:29 am)Stimbo Wrote: Interesting how, for all his whining about atheists having no moral foundation, the only one here exhibiting a total lack of decency is him.

You haven't answered my question because you don't know, this proves , The failure of atheism to account for morality.

(November 23, 2016 at 3:54 am)Mathilda Wrote: To summarise, Joker can't show that evolution isn't testable, reproducible, falsifiable and observable. When we provide evidence that it is he responds that what we are referring to is not evolution because some animals cannot breed with one another. Yet he doesn't explain why this invalidates the theory of evolution.

The Various Tests prove a young earth of 6000yrs, Creationist Science Ken Ham. 
  • Carbon-14 in Fossils and Diamonds
  • Carbon-14 Evidence for a Recent Global Flood and a Young Earth
  • Measurable 14C in Fossilized Organic Materials: Confirming the Young Earth Creation-Flood Model
  • “The Pitfalls in the Radioactive Dating Methods—The Radiocarbon Dating Method
  • The Earth’s Magnetic Field Is Young
  • The Earth’s Magnetic Field and the Age of the Earth
  • “The Earth’s Magnetic Field” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past
  • Helium Diffusion Rates Support Accelerated Nuclear Decay
  • Young Helium Diffusion Age of Zircons Supports Accelerated Nuclear Decay
  • The Age of the Earth’s Atmosphere Estimated by its Helium Content
  • “Helium in Rocks and in the Atmosphere”
  • DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria

(November 23, 2016 at 8:50 am)Mathilda Wrote:
(November 23, 2016 at 8:41 am)The Joker Wrote: That is if only if you are right, but again if you are dead then you are dead, you feel no lose!

What freedom what effort? It is the same thing without God?

You feel the loss when you are alive regardless of whether you are right or wrong. Is that so hard to understand?

You have to pay a tithe.
You're told how to behave and act according to a book and how someone else interprets it according to their own personal bias and lose the freedom to figure things out for yourself.
You have to spend time praying, going to church every Sunday and proselytising.
You are conditioned and are repressed in unhealthy ways, such as believing that non-reproductive sex and masturbation is somehow unhealthy
You are compelled to spend time and effort to infect other people with the god virus, just like you are doing now.

Believing in god is like being infected with a parasite. It takes over your life and influences your actions to help it spread to other hosts.

All rather pointless if there is no god and there is only one short finite life. This is why Pascal's wager is wrong. Believing in God carries a cost.

So what? I'd rather Go to Heaven than Hell for all eternity.
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 23, 2016 at 10:24 am)The Joker Wrote: The Various Tests prove a young earth of 6000yrs, Creationist Science Ken Ham. 
  • Carbon-14 in Fossils and Diamonds
  • Carbon-14 Evidence for a Recent Global Flood and a Young Earth
  • Measurable 14C in Fossilized Organic Materials: Confirming the Young Earth Creation-Flood Model
  • “The Pitfalls in the Radioactive Dating Methods—The Radiocarbon Dating Method
  • The Earth’s Magnetic Field Is Young
  • The Earth’s Magnetic Field and the Age of the Earth
  • “The Earth’s Magnetic Field” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past
  • Helium Diffusion Rates Support Accelerated Nuclear Decay
  • Young Helium Diffusion Age of Zircons Supports Accelerated Nuclear Decay
  • The Age of the Earth’s Atmosphere Estimated by its Helium Content
  • “Helium in Rocks and in the Atmosphere”
  • DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria

(November 23, 2016 at 8:51 am)Mathilda Wrote: Publish a peer-reviewed paper in the scientific literature and then we can talk. Until then evidence is that you're wrong.




(November 23, 2016 at 10:24 am)The Joker Wrote:
(November 23, 2016 at 8:50 am)Mathilda Wrote: You feel the loss when you are alive regardless of whether you are right or wrong. Is that so hard to understand?

You have to pay a tithe.
You're told how to behave and act according to a book and how someone else interprets it according to their own personal bias and lose the freedom to figure things out for yourself.
You have to spend time praying, going to church every Sunday and proselytising.
You are conditioned and are repressed in unhealthy ways, such as believing that non-reproductive sex and masturbation is somehow unhealthy
You are compelled to spend time and effort to infect other people with the god virus, just like you are doing now.

Believing in god is like being infected with a parasite. It takes over your life and influences your actions to help it spread to other hosts.

All rather pointless if there is no god and there is only one short finite life. This is why Pascal's wager is wrong. Believing in God carries a cost.

So what? I'd rather Go to Heaven than Hell for all eternity.

But if you're wrong and there is no eternal Heaven and Hell then you have endured the above loss during your one finite life for no reason.

Therefore Pascal's wager doesn't work. His wager assumes that there is no cost to believing. There is.

How much clearer can I make it? How many times do I need to repeat this? I've even formatted it for you.
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 23, 2016 at 10:38 am)Mathilda Wrote:
(November 23, 2016 at 10:24 am)The Joker Wrote: The Various Tests prove a young earth of 6000yrs, Creationist Science Ken Ham. 
  • Carbon-14 in Fossils and Diamonds
  • Carbon-14 Evidence for a Recent Global Flood and a Young Earth
  • Measurable 14C in Fossilized Organic Materials: Confirming the Young Earth Creation-Flood Model
  • “The Pitfalls in the Radioactive Dating Methods—The Radiocarbon Dating Method
  • The Earth’s Magnetic Field Is Young
  • The Earth’s Magnetic Field and the Age of the Earth
  • “The Earth’s Magnetic Field” from Earth’s Catastrophic Past
  • Helium Diffusion Rates Support Accelerated Nuclear Decay
  • Young Helium Diffusion Age of Zircons Supports Accelerated Nuclear Decay
  • The Age of the Earth’s Atmosphere Estimated by its Helium Content
  • “Helium in Rocks and in the Atmosphere”
  • DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria

(November 23, 2016 at 8:51 am)Mathilda Wrote: Publish a peer-reviewed paper in the scientific literature and then we can talk. Until then evidence is that you're wrong.




(November 23, 2016 at 10:24 am)The Joker Wrote: So what? I'd rather Go to Heaven than Hell for all eternity.

But if you're wrong and there is no eternal Heaven and Hell then you have endured the above loss during your one finite life for no reason.

Therefore Pascal's wager doesn't work. His wager assumes that there is no cost to believing. There is.

How much clearer can I make it? How many times do I need to repeat this? I've even formatted it for you.

That is only *If* I am wrong so what? Its not like am going to feel the pain of loss If I am dead, because If there is no God then I am dead, that is basically it I feel no loss because when your dead you don't know. But If I am right I gain everything
102932489023798247821632452361829379012830128301928309127899999999999999999999999910000000000000000000003333333333333337891638744444444444444444447019999999999999999999999913333333333344444444444444444444444444BILLION! + Eternity in heaven having all the fun! I've got nothing to lose in believing in the christian God. Christianity can be easily be proven true because of archaeology and fulfilled prophecies in the Bibe etc.
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 23, 2016 at 10:24 am)The Joker Wrote:
(November 23, 2016 at 9:29 am)Stimbo Wrote: Interesting how, for all his whining about atheists having no moral foundation, the only one here exhibiting a total lack of decency is him.

You haven't answered my question because you don't know, this proves , The failure of atheism to account for morality.

Atheism doesn't account for morality.

In the same way that solipsism doesn't account for the decline of the rain forest.

In the same way that radiometric dating has nothing to do with evolution.

All atheism is, is a lack of belief in the existence of a god or gods.

Now if you're asking how atheists can be moral then that's a different question.

Answer is that morals come from evolved pack instincts regardless of whether you are an atheist, theist, gnostic or whatever. Morals are also influenced by culture based on these biologically evolved instincts. Some people do not have any morals because of how their brains are wired. Others have a very strong sense of morality, also because of how their brains have developed.

Wipe out the human race and morality disappears.
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 23, 2016 at 10:45 am)Mathilda Wrote:
(November 23, 2016 at 10:24 am)The Joker Wrote: You haven't answered my question because you don't know, this proves , The failure of atheism to account for morality.

Atheism doesn't account for morality.

In the same way that solipsism doesn't account for the decline of the rain forest.

In the same way that radiometric dating has nothing to do with evolution.

All atheism is, is a lack of belief in the existence of a god or gods.

Now if you're asking how atheists can be moral then that's a different question.

Answer is that morals come from evolved pack instincts regardless of whether you are an atheist, theist, gnostic or whatever. Morals are also influenced by culture based on these biologically evolved instincts. Some people do not have any morals because of how their brains are wired. Others have a very strong sense of morality, also because of how their brains have developed.

Wipe out the human race and morality disappears.

Give me evidence how morals evolve?
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Joker, you're allowed to post links as long as it's relevant to the discussion.
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 23, 2016 at 10:43 am)The Joker Wrote: That is only *If* I am wrong so what? Its not like am going to feel the pain of loss If I am dead, because If there is no God then I am dead, that is basically it I feel no loss because when your dead you don't know. But If I am right I gain everything

And if you are wrong then you have wasted your one single finite life. You won't care about it if you are dead, but people do care about wasting their lives when they are alive.

(November 23, 2016 at 10:38 am)Mathilda Wrote: Therefore Pascal's wager doesn't work. His wager assumes that there is no cost to believing. There is.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 10930 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Why did Communists promote Evolution? Nishant Xavier 318 25405 September 7, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 7186 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 640 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 2884 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 2660 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 14058 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 180670 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Why was Newton a theist? Alexmahone 65 14669 March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why America is anti-theist. Goosebump 3 1275 March 1, 2018 at 9:06 am
Last Post: mlmooney89



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)