Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 2, 2026, 2:31 pm

Poll: Would you pay the ransom?
This poll is closed.
Yes
30.43%
7 30.43%
No
30.43%
7 30.43%
I couldn't say until it happened
39.13%
9 39.13%
Total 23 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Would you negotiate with terrorists?
#11
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
(January 19, 2017 at 12:18 pm)Divinity Wrote: Are we talking Terrorists or Kidnappers here? I'm confused.

I'd pay. The life of any of my children or grandchildren (even the son I don't get along with) is worth more than any money. Of course if I ever discovered their identity, I'd destroy them and everything they love.

Then how are you any different from them, first you give them incentive to go and do the same thing to someone else then you would take matters into your own hands and treat them as you were treated. There are reasons for the rule of law. I will admit when I read the scenario my first thought was to take them out but, with some thought I realized that's not the right choice in this situation. The situation as presented leaves one with no control and at a great disadvantage.

GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#12
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
(January 19, 2017 at 12:42 pm)Godschild Wrote:
(January 19, 2017 at 12:18 pm)Divinity Wrote: Are we talking Terrorists or Kidnappers here?  I'm confused.  

I'd pay.  The life of any of my children or grandchildren (even the son I don't get along with) is worth more than any money.  Of course if I ever discovered their identity, I'd destroy them and everything they love.

Then how are you any different from them, first you give them incentive to go and do the same thing to someone else then you would take matters into your own hands and treat them as you were treated. There are reasons for the rule of law. I will admit when I read the scenario my first thought was to take them out but, with some thought I realized that's not the right choice in this situation. The situation as presented leaves one with no control and at a great disadvantage.

GC

Bolded mine.  Are you serious?  You're equating grief-stricken loved ones paying a ransom in an attempt to save a life with the kidnappers?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#13
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
Throwing money at something guarantees we all get more of it.

My personal response is irrelevant, the government should take the harshest measures possible to discourage it.
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#14
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
(January 19, 2017 at 12:41 pm)abaris Wrote:
(January 19, 2017 at 12:30 pm)Godschild Wrote: To pay will embolden them by giving them a sense of sucess, this is the last thing you want to do with this type of people.

So you would do the "right" thing and let them perish for the "greater good". Either you're really as despicable or you're not honest with yourself.

Honest really, let's look at honest, almost no victim is returned whether the money is paid or not that is reality. If everyone pays then where does it stop, if no one pays it becomes a worthless and risky proposition for any kidnapper. If I don't react for the "greater good" then what value does my loved ones life have, money? I as you would want to pay but this world isn't just about us, is it.

GC

(January 19, 2017 at 12:47 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Throwing money at something guarantees we all get more of it.

My personal response is irrelevant, the government should take the harshest measures possible to discourage it.

That use to be the death penalty and I personally believe it still should be.

GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#15
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
OK, so you would let them perish for sure instead of taking the one and only. Good to know for future reference. In case you feel like riding the high religious morality horse again.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#16
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
That's a tough one.

I would most likely pay and negotiate with the terrorists but I would also try and find out the identity of them and have my revenge later on.
Reply
#17
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
I'd negotiate with the terrorists but probably take the official route through the police and see what happens.

since I live in the uk and kidnapping isn't common here I'd assume that the kidnappers are either deranged and psychotic and not to be trusted, or bluffing at how dangerous they are and don't really want to be in this situation and would hopefully just let my family go once they realise the police are involved.

I can't really say what I'd do for definite but in general the best rule of thumb I go by is to not bow down to intimidation tactics.


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply
#18
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
(January 19, 2017 at 12:44 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:
(January 19, 2017 at 12:42 pm)Godschild Wrote:


Bolded mine.  Are you serious?  You're equating grief-stricken loved ones paying a ransom in an attempt to save a life with the kidnappers?

Read my post to "abaris." I didn't say it would be an easy thing to do, it would be heart wrenching. Where is the logic in paying when the result will be that the kidnappers are not going to leave witnesses behind, they've already threatened to kill them if they don't get the money so we would have to assume they would have no problem with killing them if it means they can't be identified. Self preservation is just as important to them as it is to you wanting to save a loved one. The money becomes useless if they can't spend it.

GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#19
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
(January 19, 2017 at 12:44 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:
(January 19, 2017 at 12:42 pm)Godschild Wrote: Then how are you any different from them, first you give them incentive to go and do the same thing to someone else then you would take matters into your own hands and treat them as you were treated. There are reasons for the rule of law. I will admit when I read the scenario my first thought was to take them out but, with some thought I realized that's not the right choice in this situation. The situation as presented leaves one with no control and at a great disadvantage.

GC

Bolded mine.  Are you serious?  You're equating grief-stricken loved ones paying a ransom in an attempt to save a life with the kidnappers?

G-C must have asked "what would jesus do?"
Reply
#20
RE: Would you negotiate with terrorists?
(January 19, 2017 at 10:56 am)abaris Wrote: Of course I would pay if it's the only chance. I can't imagine anyone not doing it and throwing their loved ones to the wolves.

My thoughts exactly. I don't think I could ever look at myself in the mirror again, knowing I didn't at least do everything I could.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Would you still cook if you diddn't have to? Angrboda 41 8737 October 30, 2023 at 3:40 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Which famous clone would you adopt? Fake Messiah 10 2775 January 24, 2023 at 7:49 am
Last Post: h4ym4n
  Which TV game show would you win? Fake Messiah 6 2050 January 18, 2023 at 11:18 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Would you kiss Pope's ring? Fake Messiah 30 5060 July 29, 2022 at 11:17 am
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  ‘Would You Rather’ Scenarios BrianSoddingBoru4 25 5561 June 26, 2022 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  How many of you would punish religious people for being religious? Ahriman 222 58343 May 2, 2022 at 2:45 am
Last Post: Losty
  What would you do if given a ton of money? Ahriman 23 4402 December 27, 2021 at 1:49 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Where would you go if you could? Jackie 24 6660 August 18, 2021 at 6:56 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  What would you like to do in 2021? awty 42 11394 April 13, 2021 at 1:48 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
Thumbs Up Would you be open to _________ onlinebiker 29 6655 June 21, 2020 at 7:54 am
Last Post: awty



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)