(January 23, 2017 at 2:34 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:

(January 23, 2017 at 2:09 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: He is an inveterate liar.

I read this as invertebrate liar.  LOL

That's what I wrote before I proof read, spooky.

Just had a chat on facebook about the inauguration photo. The Drumpfuck posted a picture taken from behind Trump showing crowds going back to the other side. I pointed out that it's taken at a low angle and so the white patches are (barely) hidden. His response to the one by Reuters is that you can't see Trump in them and that Reuters is deliberately lying about the timing. He refused to admit to the issue of foreshortening.

Unbelievable.

You had to be an asshole to vote for the WLB in the first place.  Why would you expect something different from one of them?

Quote:That One picture could have captured the event when it wasn't at its largest and then been deliberately used for comparison to one that was

But it didn't. It's a screen cap from television, taken during Trump's speech, when the crowd could reasonably have been expected to be at maximum.

Boru

(January 23, 2017 at 2:39 pm)Mathilda Wrote: Just had a chat on facebook about the inauguration photo. The Drumpfuck posted a picture taken from behind Trump showing crowds going back to the other side. I pointed out that it's taken at a low angle and so the white patches are (barely) hidden. His response to the one by Reuters is that you can't see Trump in them and that Reuters is deliberately lying about the timing. He refused to admit to the issue of foreshortening.

Unbelievable.

How the hell would see trump in such a picture the excuses these people make up. And showing a low angle photo where white patches are visible. There even good at lying sad

(January 22, 2017 at 7:11 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote:

(January 22, 2017 at 7:08 pm)Orochi Wrote: You shown it to be false ?

Yep. Not only did TRUMP not claim that it was the largest inaugeration ever, but the shit about him using the bee movie narrative in his speech was shown to be blatantly false, too.

(January 22, 2017 at 7:10 pm)Minimalist Wrote: You are wrong if you think credibility does not matter.  You are not covering yourself with glory here.

Nice. Dodge my question. Credibility does matter. You made a claim, now back it up.

---

(January 22, 2017 at 7:11 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote:

(January 22, 2017 at 7:08 pm)Orochi Wrote: You shown it to be false ?

Yep. Not only did TRUMP not claim that it was the largest inaugeration ever, but the shit about him using the bee movie narrative in his speech was shown to be blatantly false, too

When I was shown the evidence that the bee movie stuff was false I immediately held my hands up and admitted id been duped.
That is the difference. Trump had his staff lie about something that doesn't matter. What will he be prepared to do when it does.

Celebrity Despot asshole demagogue fuckface Trump's lying about his turnout is simply part of his long term bullshit bluffing started 5 years ago. If this fucker is willing to lie about this he most certainly is willing to be the bully he has been proven to be.

There is no conspiracy about his numbers, multiple CREDIBLE sources prove he and Spicer are lying their fucking asses off.