Yeah, I shit you not. The Heil is no longer an acceptable source per Wikipedia, because "Based on the requests for comments section , volunteer editors on English Wikipedia have come to a consensus that the Daily Mail is ‘generally unreliable and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist", according to this article in The Grauniad. Paul Dacre must be proud that his rag had beat out the likes of Russia Today, Breitbart and Fox news to be declared an unreliable source that should be avoided at all costs.

'Daily Heil'

That's cute.

Come on, you can be a bit more creative than that!

Compared to the likes of the Daily Mail, Breitbart and Fox News, Russia Today is very reliable. Let's not pretend the likes of The New York Times and CNN are any more reliable than RT. Most of the people working at the New York Times and CNN, for example, just pump out whatever the DNC tells them to. Hence Donna Brazille left CNN because we found out how she sneaked questions to Hilary.

(February 9, 2017 at 7:32 am)Bella Morte Wrote: 'Daily Heil'

That's cute.

Come on, you can be a bit more creative than that!

"Daily Fail" is the accepted name, and always has been!

(February 9, 2017 at 7:32 am)Bella Morte Wrote: 'Daily Heil'

That's cute.

Come on, you can be a bit more creative than that!

I'll continue to call them that until they repudiate their support for National Socialism and Hitler, something you'd imagine they'd have done as long ago as 1946 at least.

---

(February 9, 2017 at 10:02 am)ReptilianPeon Wrote: Russia Today is very  reliable.

What you smoking, RP? We know that RT is the inhouse media agglomeration of a far right neo-nazi dictatorship, Russia's answer to Der Sturmer. Calling it reliable is just stupid.

(February 9, 2017 at 10:02 am)ReptilianPeon Wrote: Compared to the likes of the Daily Mail, Breitbart and Fox News, Russia Today is very  reliable. Let's not pretend the likes of The New York Times and CNN are any more reliable than RT. Most of the people working at the New York Times and CNN, for example, just pump out whatever the DNC tells them to. Hence Donna Brazille left CNN because we found out how she sneaked questions to Hilary.

You don't read the Times, do you?

Hey Tazzy, do you read An Phoblacht?

(February 9, 2017 at 11:15 am)Tazzycorn Wrote: I'll continue to call them that until they repudiate their support for National Socialism and Hitler, something you'd imagine they'd have done as long ago as 1946 at least.

---

Citation?

(February 9, 2017 at 10:02 am)ReptilianPeon Wrote: Compared to the likes of the Daily Mail, Breitbart and Fox News, Russia Today is very  reliable. Let's not pretend the likes of The New York Times and CNN are any more reliable than RT. Most of the people working at the New York Times and CNN, for example, just pump out whatever the DNC tells them to. Hence Donna Brazille left CNN because we found out how she sneaked questions to Hilary.

Sure, whatever. The sky is also brown, and 2 + 2 = 7.

Seriously, dude, you're letting your raging hard-on of hate for the Democrats cloud your judgement.

People really think the DNC runs the news???


ROFL. Omg, we are soooo fucked.