I'm sure the creatards will come up with some bullshit story.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/how-did-...nd-a-clue/

Quote:How did life form? Astronomers find a clue

Quote:The same week we learned that the human species may be older than was previously believed, it was disclosed that two teams of astronomers report that they have found molecules related to the building blocks of life at a Sun-like star, providing insight into the origins of life on Earth.

Lego's?

(June 8, 2017 at 7:02 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Lego's?

Our pollution has reached THAT far?

The molecules were delivered by Amazon drones.

Hey Jesus !!!

I'm going to emit some organic molecules just for you !!!!

(June 8, 2017 at 7:07 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:

(June 8, 2017 at 7:02 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Lego's?

Our pollution has reached THAT far?

They might be making their own. Wouldn't that be a hoot!

That's why god can't ever have anything nice.

(June 8, 2017 at 7:46 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Hey Jesus !!!

I'm going to emit some organic molecules just for you !!!!

That's just another way of saying what Min says about Jebus.

Pretty much Fireball, except Vorls prefers to blow it into his arse, not out! A very small but significant difference...

So Minimalist provides this article stating that scientists have found a sugar molecule and methyl isocyanate in a distant star system and that this is a clue as to how life formed and nobody here thought to push back at this at all??? Amazing!!

Maybe the following question would be appropriate:

Given that sugars and methyl isocyanate already exist here on earth and still no scientist that I know of has come up with a natrualistic mechanism for forming life from non-life, how does finding these materials in a distant star system provide any more clues to how life formed than anything that we already know?

Or maybe simply:

Scientists have found a sugar molecule and methyl isocyanate in a distant star system...so what?

Perhaps no atheists wanted to push back as doing so might highlight the lack of any known naturalistic mechanism for forming life from non-life????

C'mon, Minimalist, explain the significance of the finding such that any story whatsoever would be needed from a creationist or anyone else.

Have at it guys!!

Finding even microbial life within our solar system should not surprise anyone. The atoms as individual atoms that make up carbon exist everywhere in the universe so none of this find should surprise anyone. Exploding stars create all the atoms and materials we know of today. Intelligent life like ours that will be harder to find. And no, I don't buy the little green men/ Area 51 ancient aliens bullshit by saying that.

---

(August 8, 2017 at 11:30 am)rjh4 is back Wrote: So Minimalist provides this article stating that scientists have found a sugar molecule and methyl isocyanate in a distant star system and that this is a clue as to how life formed and nobody here thought to push back at this at all??? Amazing!!

Maybe the following question would be appropriate:

Given that sugars and methyl isocyanate already exist here on earth and still no scientist that I know of has come up with a natrualistic mechanism for forming life from non-life, how does finding these materials in a distant star system provide any more clues to how life formed than anything that we already know?

Or maybe simply:

Scientists have found a sugar molecule and methyl isocyanate in a distant star system...so what?

Perhaps no atheists wanted to push back as doing so might highlight the lack of any known naturalistic mechanism for forming life from non-life????

C'mon, Minimalist, explain the significance of the finding such that any story whatsoever would be needed from a creationist or anyone else.

Have at it guys!!

Typical bullshit, and not only bullshit, Christians also stupidly think they are the only religion to either try to debunk science or, when they cant do that, they try to co opt science to point to their club. Hate to burst your bubble, but every religion in the world has followers who pull this bullshit.

No magic one bit needed, no sky puppeteer needed. 

The atoms in life that make up carbon based molecules have a far different structure in those molecules than non living things. 

No magic super hero needed to explain life or the universe. For the same reason you don't need to insert Poseidon the ocean god as being the cause of hurricanes. 

How does non life get to life? Simple non cognitive tiny processes that produce a variety of atom arrangements. 

Please don't hand me your fictional factory boss garbage.