(August 15, 2017 at 3:34 pm)Fr33Th1nker Wrote:(August 15, 2017 at 3:24 pm)Astonished Wrote: ...
FT...You didn't even make it two threads without revealing you're totally full of shit. See what I was talking about? You cannot possibly be honest and hold the position you do. When confronted with, admittedly the most embarrassing sort of proof that your claim about the bible is completely wrong, you erect a straw man rather than acknowledge the validity of the opposition's argument. That doesn't jive with the claim that you're trying to evaluate whether you have good reasons for believing what you do. I'm sorry, but you've fallen into the trap and you've convinced yourself you're above the pale, and you're really, really not. Want to dispute this? I don't think you can. It's utterly hypocritical to criticize other theists for not admitting being wrong or not having an answer and not doing so yourself when it's shoved in your face.
Have you read the book of Psalms? Wisdom? Etc? Do you expect a book of wisdom to have all sentences written in it to be wise? Seriously, you are sounding like a fundamentalist. Anyway, I'm tired. I'm sorry if I won't be able to stay any longer to discuss things with you. However, I do appreciate the time that you spent enlightening me. That could never be replaced. I'll reach out to you again tomorrow, if it's ok with you. =)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 9, 2025, 3:00 pm
Thread Rating:
Forgeries in the NT
|
RE: Forgeries in the NT
August 15, 2017 at 3:40 pm
(This post was last modified: August 15, 2017 at 3:46 pm by Astonished.)
(August 15, 2017 at 3:34 pm)Fr33Th1nker Wrote:(August 15, 2017 at 3:24 pm)Astonished Wrote: ... Does the incredible amount (and tremendous degree of) idiocy not cancel out what little wisdom can be found? If I'm going to take something seriously, I don't want it to have a shitty ratio of good ideas to bad ones. If the wisdom in there is so simple a child could come across it without having to be directly taught, is that really wisdom? If the wisdom is plagiarized from somewhere else, can the plagiarist legitimately claim credit for it? If the wisdom is founded on shitty justifications, is it really wisdom (sort of the equivalent of guessing right on a multiple-choice question purely by accident)? If the rate of finding wisdom is like finding a handful of different-colored grains of sand in a desert, is that even a good method for looking for wisdom? You don't have a damn leg to stand on. Fuck YES I expect a book OF wisdom to be wise in virtually everything it says. A book that contains 'single-digit % wisdom, but mostly filler' does not deserve to be called a book of wisdom. You're once again allowing your confirmation bias to color your view on the thing. If you sincerely don't want to fall into the trappings of other theists' gullibility, then STOP. Please, PLEASE start actually thinking. I want to have at least one decent conversationalist on the theist side while I'm on this site.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
--- There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views. (August 15, 2017 at 3:38 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Oh my, who said that it is my book? For a critical and free thinker, you assume too much. What happened to scientific approach or investigation? You haven't asked me anything and now you are assuming that it is my book? Is that the reason why you are quoting the Bible to me? LOL! This is the best joke I have ever heard today.(August 15, 2017 at 1:10 pm)Fr33Th1nker Wrote: Honestly, I am a bit disappointed with your comment. I never expected something like this coming from an atheist. Your reply is in league with a bible fundamentalist. You are no different than the Bible thumping, self righteous Christians who you abhor so much. Read the entire chapter and use your analytical and critical thinking. Then tell me what it really means. Anyway, I already told a friend here (actually, it is one sided as he does not consider me as his friend) that I need to rest. If it is ok with you, we could continue this discussion again tomorrow. Maybe you would want to ask what my views are just to have an idea on what to talk about. Enjoy your day. RE: Forgeries in the NT
August 15, 2017 at 4:01 pm
(This post was last modified: August 15, 2017 at 4:36 pm by Fr33Th1nker.)
(August 15, 2017 at 3:22 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(August 15, 2017 at 1:22 am)Fr33Th1nker Wrote: The Bible is a book of wisdom, not a book of facts. The Bible is a book of compiled books arranged by men who were are at one point or another depending on the period of history, either holy, sinners, frauds, fair, smart, dumb, adulterer, etc. Thus, the Bible is corrupted and written and compiled according to the whim and advantage of ruling religious clan, family, group or sect. I think i may have made a double post in error. sorry. Quote:Does the incredible amount (and tremendous degree of) idiocy not cancel out what little wisdom can be found? Yup. (August 15, 2017 at 4:04 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:Does the incredible amount (and tremendous degree of) idiocy not cancel out what little wisdom can be found?
I think you need to go take your meds.
(August 15, 2017 at 3:22 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(August 15, 2017 at 1:22 am)Fr33Th1nker Wrote: The Bible is a book of wisdom, not a book of facts. The Bible is a book of compiled books arranged by men who were are at one point or another depending on the period of history, either holy, sinners, frauds, fair, smart, dumb, adulterer, etc. Thus, the Bible is corrupted and written and compiled according to the whim and advantage of ruling religious clan, family, group or sect. I believe in God, an omnipotent and omniscient Being or entity that initiated everything. I don't believe that Jesus is God or the son of God hence I don't care about the Jesus quote or need to waste my time pondering on something that has already been established as fallacy. Most of the Old Testament are myths or folklore. And to use the Bible as reference as to how we should live our lives in the 21st Century or how the universe was created is absurd. The people and culture back then are light years away from the people, culture and lifestyle of people these days. When I said that the Bible is a book of Wisdom and not facts, I meant that there are stories, insights and reference that we could learn from. As for the statement, you should understand that back then, times where very different. No one has the guts to say something like "I and the Father are One" or I am the son of God. So imagine what the masses have felt when a human made this declaration. Thus a generation of religious slaves were born passing this slave mentality from one generation to another. Sorry but that is my insight. (August 14, 2017 at 11:59 pm)Astonished Wrote:(August 13, 2017 at 8:29 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Ok.... so your peculiar reference to contradictions in these would seem to make less since as an atheist. Under any normal circumstance, as I argued before, I don't think there is any contradiction (unless you add an argument from silence which is unwarranted and unusual). As I explained, depending on the focus, intent, or whatever other factors, a speakers choice to expand or contract information is not all that unusual. Just because someone only mentions or focuses on one person, while another person includes others in their account, does not make it a contradiction. Only mentioning one person does not exclude others, unless it is explicitly specified. So that there definitely not a contradiction, and I don't see the a problem. Now an argument from silence, I would imagine would be something like, this person wasn't mentioned, therefore the speaker didn't know about any others. This is possible, especially if the one telling you wasn't there (but really doesn't matter in the information being conveyed). However, the assumption that because it wasn't mentioned it was unknown is unwarranted in this case I believe and ignores usual aspects of communications.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
I understand you raging desire to save your silly godboy from the dustbin of history.
However, there is absolutely no evidence that fucking allah split the moon in two. Therefore, using your absurd reasoning, you must conclude that he did because some muslim wrote it down in an old fucking book. There is no evidence that Zeus fathered Apollo and Artemis by shagging their human mother Leto. But because some Greek wrote it down you must also insist that it is true. There is no evidence that Quetlcoatl descended into Mitclan to gather the bones of the ancient dead. Do you believe that also. You are a champion of speclal pleading, RR. You think your bullshit is real and every other claim is false. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)