Forgeries in the NT

[Amarok]

This should be roads motto

[Minimalist]

These are your fucking books, dummy.  I don't consider them "inspired" or "inerrant" or "written by the fucking finger of god." 

Ok.... so your peculiar reference to contradictions in these would seem to make less since as an atheist.  Under any normal circumstance, as I argued before, I don't think there is any contradiction (unless you add an argument from silence which is unwarranted and unusual).

Do you think you place odd expectations here... some kind of reverse atheist fundamentalism?

Fuck you.  I didn't write them and am under no obligation to try to reconcile them with each other.  I leave that to apologist assholes who can't seem to understand that each of the last three of these pieces of shit was copied from the first one so the "they are just telling the same story in different ways" excuse is simply a large pile of dung.  But this is your fucking problem.  Not mine.

That doesn't prevent me from watching you twist your balls into a knot trying to escape the dilemma.

[RoadRunner79]

The dilemma, that you apparently don't want to discuss, and I believe you brought up.

And for others, By the way... posts along these lines are where the generalizations about angry atheist come from!

[The Grand Nudger]

Sure they are. It's not as if that;s part of the batshit christer script regardless of whether or not a person has ever met Min or anything......

What is it, in you, that makes you so desperate to export your own internal failures onto others and the world at large?  Rhetorical - jesus, obviously.  

[Minimalist]

The dilemma, that you apparently don't want to discuss, and I believe you brought up.

And for others, By the way... posts along these lines are where the generalizations about angry atheist come from!

Despite your dancing around, the contradictions in your holy horseshit remain.  I'm sorry you can't see it but I expected nothing more from you.  You've shown your colors before.


BTW, it doesn't come across well in text but I'm not angry.  In fact, I'm laughing at your bullshit.  You have no idea how desperate and absurd you sound.

[Amarok]

posts along these lines are where the generalizations about angry atheist come from!

Christians would employ that trope no matter how civil the unbeliever . Nor how justified the nature of the criticism . It's a cheap and easy and lazy hand waving tactic to boot .And mins addressed your point plenty . Your whining does not change that.

---

"they are just telling the same story in different ways"

Pure horse shit . This makes Donald Trumps back tracking look ingenious .

[Astonished]

These are your fucking books, dummy.  I don't consider them "inspired" or "inerrant" or "written by the fucking finger of god." 

Ok.... so your peculiar reference to contradictions in these would seem to make less since as an atheist.  Under any normal circumstance, as I argued before, I don't think there is any contradiction (unless you add an argument from silence which is unwarranted and unusual).

Do you think you place odd expectations here... some kind of reverse atheist fundamentalism?

How the goddamn fucking fuck is an argument from silence unwarranted or unusual? The fuck is wrong with you? Seriously!

[Fr33Th1nker]

The Bible is a book of wisdom, not a book of facts. The Bible is a book of compiled books arranged by men who were are at one point or another depending on the period of history, either holy, sinners, frauds, fair, smart, dumb, adulterer, etc. Thus, the Bible is corrupted and written and compiled according to the whim and advantage of ruling religious clan, family, group or sect.

There is no point arguing this with most, if not all theist as they are blinded by their ignorance, arrogance and pride. They will always say "Divinely Inspired", "God moves in mysterious ways", and "God has a plan" instead of saying the right thing to say like "I am sorry, you are right" or "I am sorry, I do not know the answer". If I erase the Bible or any "Holy" book from man's memory and history, they will not have the belief that God exists. This is my own opinion being a believer because I have seen it and experienced it.

[Succubus]

The Bible is a book of wisdom, not a book of facts. <Guff snip>

2 Kings18:27 But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master sent me to thy master, and to thee, to speak these words? hath he not sent me to the men which sit on the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?

Doesn’t sound very wise to me.

[Amarok]

Ok.... so your peculiar reference to contradictions in these would seem to make less since as an atheist.  Under any normal circumstance, as I argued before, I don't think there is any contradiction (unless you add an argument from silence which is unwarranted and unusual).

Do you think you place odd expectations here... some kind of reverse atheist fundamentalism?

How the goddamn fucking fuck is an argument from silence unwarranted or unusual? The fuck is wrong with you? Seriously!

Indeed an argument from silence can be totally valid as Peter Kirby points out

https://infidels.org/library/modern/pete...lence.html

Or

http://vridar.org/2010/11/03/the-argument-from-silence/

Or

http://vridar.org/2010/08/14/do-mythicis...sumptions/

Or

http://vridar.org/2012/05/11/10-earl-doh...f-silence/


Apologists and Anti Mythicists love dragging this tired chestnut out . However most of the time in error and it has not been used incorrectly .