(March 9, 2018 at 4:17 pm)He lives Wrote:  Do you have another possibility for abiogenesis? I only know of two, intelligent design or happenstance.

(March 10, 2018 at 2:48 am)He lives Wrote: Up to date research on abiogenesis has many hypothesis on the beginning of life. Which of these do you prefer? However they are all based on happenstance.

(March 9, 2018 at 10:54 pm)He lives Wrote: God is the epitome of intelligence. What is surprising is that anyone could possibly believe that the human body came into existence by any other means than intelligent design.

(March 9, 2018 at 7:19 pm)Banned Wrote:

(March 9, 2018 at 5:39 pm)Succubus Wrote: Intelligent design? No. 'God did it' is not a theory.

A theory can be anything.
But once you make a theory the truth...then ! ?

(March 10, 2018 at 4:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

Quote:I believe that intelligence has always existed and that our bodies were intellectually designed.

Tooth decay, renal failure, harlequin foetus syndrome, cancers too numerous to list, eyes in backwards, haemophilia, Larsen syndrome, mircocephaly, spina bifida, congenital syphilis, cri du chat, Huntington's chorea, lissencephaly and on and on and on.

So, tell me - where does the 'intelligence' come in?
Boru

(March 10, 2018 at 10:10 am)Little Rik Wrote: [...]Did God cut the forests or pollute the planet or engage sex with animals to create new diseases?[...]

(March 10, 2018 at 5:38 am)robvalue Wrote: I think they have a magical story to explain the difference between the first magical story and what we observe. Something to do with the creator vandalizing his creation because they ate some naughty fruit.

Oh, I expect little Rik will say it's punishment for not getting enough Karma Points on your last try.

(March 9, 2018 at 6:36 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(March 9, 2018 at 11:33 am)Little Rik Wrote: Your stupidity has no limits yog.  

First of all you only present one point among those who I already knock down in the previous post.
Wonder why you keep silent about those.  

I did mention those.  They were irrelevant quibbles like I said.  

(March 9, 2018 at 11:33 am)Little Rik Wrote: Generally speaking reincarnation is necessary only in case when the karma is still present or when a parallelism with God has not been achieved yet.
But even there some of those who had an NDEs and could stay with God come back not because they still had some karma but for other reason like a mother that feel sad to leave her little kids alone so let us not generalize and see case by case.  

Your worthless speculation is noted.  Try addressing the point, dickwad.  None of this is evidence of reincarnation.  And here you've introduced some God character.  Where's your evidence for God?  You can't just assert his existence.  Assertions like that are just as easily dismissed.  And now you've introduced yet another bullshit religious notion, karma.  Where's the evidence for karma?  You don't demonstrate one unjustified claim by making more unjustified claims.  You don't have evidence for shit, and the only way your babblings make any sense is if we charitably give you additional things you can't demonstrate.  Well fuck that.  Demonstrate God, karma, and reincarnation.  You're going backwards, not forwards, piling on additional bullshit that you can't demonstrate.

(March 9, 2018 at 11:33 am)Little Rik Wrote: Science teach us that to reach a goal we got to go through a lot of hard work.
If you need to get a degree in something you got to go through primary, high school, other teachings, uni and so on.
Human evolution run in the same way.
One life is not enough to reach the goal of life that is why reincarnation is needed.

More bullshit.  It's generally assumed that achieving a goal requires work.  What isn't assumed is that "evolution run in the same way."  That's just another worthless bare assertion on your part.  It's not evidence.  It's just shit you pulled from your ass.  It doesn't demonstrate squat.

(March 9, 2018 at 11:33 am)Little Rik Wrote: This is science yog.
The very science that atheists glorify all the time.
The funny thing is that science contradict atheists all the time so atheists are left with an empty fist and a lot of fantasies.    

No, that wasn't science, it was more of your unevidenced fantasies.  It's garbage and has nothing to do with science.  

(March 9, 2018 at 11:33 am)Little Rik Wrote: Obviousy NDEs in most cases entails reincarnation.

Obviously....   Not!  This is what you're supposed to be demonstrating, not simply asserting.  Again you fail at the most basic of tasks.

(March 9, 2018 at 11:33 am)Little Rik Wrote: Why then God would send these people back?
If these people would be ready to be with God right then then God would not send them back.
It is like in this physical-material life that if you still have some work to do you are not ready to get your degree.

Who the fuck is "God" and what evidence do you have that he/she/it exists?  You don't demonstrate one thing without evidence by simply asserting something else that is equally without evidence.  Even IF I were to accept the existence of this "God," this is nothing more than baseless speculation.  You were asked to show that NDEs necessarily entail reincarnation.  Your masturbatory fantasies about what some "God" would do are thoroughly worthless.  They don't demonstrate shit.  All we have is your worthless assertion that it is "like" that.  Two can play that game.  I assert that it is NOT like that.  Now, where's your evidence that it is "like" that? It's like you don't have a fucking clue what it takes to demonstrate reincarnation.  Given that, I can only assume you swallowed the idea without any such demonstration.  You wanted to believe the dogma, so you did.  It is "like" you don't know fuckall about reincarnation and are just running off at the mouth without proving anything.

(March 9, 2018 at 11:33 am)Little Rik Wrote: I bet you never though of that yog, did you?  

That I never thought about the fact that you're a worthless twat who doesn't have the first clue how to make a coherent case for his beliefs?  Yeah, I knew that.  Like usual, you talk and talk but it's all empty assertions and bullshit analogies that you can't substantiate.

Try again, fucktard.  Your last post was a total waste.