Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 8, 2024, 12:10 am

Poll: .
This poll is closed.
This WOULD be a deal breaker for me in terms of pursuing a romantic relationship
66.67%
20 66.67%
This would NOT be a deal breaker for me in terms of pursuing a romantic relationship
33.33%
10 33.33%
Total 30 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Question for the heterosexual men of AF
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
(March 23, 2018 at 10:57 am)notimportant1234 Wrote:
(March 23, 2018 at 10:49 am)wallym Wrote: Are you implying that people with psychological disorders are somehow feeble and damaged, and shouldn't be compared to 'regular' folks?  

Didn't you just condescendingly do the same thing he did in your rebuke?

No and no. I'm not in the mood to deal with your frustration, I would have criticized him no matter the situation.

It was just funny that you were inadvertently insulting the person you were defending.  Don't worry about it, just something for me to get a chuckle over.  The worlds a funny place.
Reply
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
(March 23, 2018 at 11:11 am)wallym Wrote: If the choice was this person and nobody ever, it'd be a different decision.  Then I'd start rationalizing using the arguments your making.  Well, it's not a penis anymore.  And it looks like a normal vagina.  It's an unrealistic hypothetical about a different version of me, so who knows where I'd end up.

The point is, if every time you think of the person you're attracted to you are triggered to think about something else you find unattractive because reasons... that doesn't mean you are no longer attracted to the person when it has absolutely nothing to do with it.

If I love apple pies but every time I think of one I'm reminded of dog shit and feel yucky and don't feel in the mood for apple pie.... that doesn't mean I don't like apple pies even if I am completely convinced that it does mean that and I say "apple pies are ruined for me" (that's deluded they're not ruined for me at all, I just keep thinking about dog shit. The experience of enjoying tasty apple pie is ruined, but I still like apple pie, I'm just not able to access that experience anymore because dog shit), it means I don't like dog shit, it doesn't mean that I don't like apple pie, and it means that something weird and irrelevant has triggered that thinking-about-dogshit response in me.

And in the case of transwomen, I think transphobia has triggered it.
Reply
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
I don't like beef stew because I ate it once when I had a stomach bug. I might still like it if that hadn't happened, but I'm still not going to fuck it.
Reply
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
(March 23, 2018 at 10:33 am)Antares Wrote:
(March 23, 2018 at 10:03 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: Because I have an active imagination, and don't like thinking about dicks.

I don't think about them either. I hope you can work around this thing you don't like. 
[Image: 4cffdbd1b926067d8cabc8154dba369507216080...3f21a9.jpg]

free upload site no registration

It’s not exactly dicks everywhere.  It’s dick at a particular spot where a real dick with all the right tissue and function really was, and where a thing that is only cosmetically like a vagina and lacking the right tissue type and function is now.

Not saying that can’t be enough, but it is perfectly understandable if that is not enough for some people.
Reply
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
(March 23, 2018 at 11:13 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(March 23, 2018 at 10:36 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: The irony of saying I didn't grasp basic thought experiments while not even understanding the pink elephant metaphor is razor sharp. I doubt you'll really avoid talking to me. Half my responses on this forum seem to come from you. I think you like me, deep down. I'm who you'd like to be, confident, social, good with women, athletic, educated and smart. I spend all my time outside and am never depressed.

Lol come on Cap, you can't say stuff like that. That's a bit harsh.

Do you ever worry holding some people to a higher standard than others is condescending to the 'others'?  Sometimes it reads as:

"So and so is a mush brained idiot, so they can't help themselves, but you, a non-mush brain, are capable of being better."

Which may very well be true, but I'd worry the mush brained folks see what you're doing, and it makes them feel worse than someone being a jerk to them on a forum where everyone is a jerk to everyone.
Reply
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
(March 23, 2018 at 11:14 am)wallym Wrote:
(March 23, 2018 at 10:57 am)notimportant1234 Wrote: No and no. I'm not in the mood to deal with your frustration, I would have criticized him no matter the situation.

It was just funny that you were inadvertently insulting the person you were defending.  Don't worry about it, just something for me to get a chuckle over.  The worlds a funny place.

So if someone says to me" you would wish to have eyes as good as mine" and another person comes to my defense and says " f you he has myopia", the person who defended me also insulted me because he pointed out that I have eye problems?
Reply
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
Oh, come on. A post quite that self-aggrandizing isn't common here, or anywhere else. It practically begs to be criticized. Part of me hopes he was being sarcastically smug, because that would actually be pretty funny.
Reply
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
(March 23, 2018 at 11:24 am)wallym Wrote:
(March 23, 2018 at 11:13 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Lol come on Cap, you can't say stuff like that. That's a bit harsh.

Do you ever worry holding some people to a higher standard than others is condescending to the 'others'?  Sometimes it reads as:

"So and so is a mush brained idiot, so they can't help themselves, but you, a non-mush brain, are capable of being better."

Which may very well be true, but I'd worry the mush brained folks see what you're doing, and it makes them feel worse than someone being a jerk to them on a forum where everyone is a jerk to everyone.

I see your point. I guess I can't help but feel a little defensive of Ham because of my autistic nephew. It's an emotional response on my end, but I see how it can be condecending to both my nephew and Ham.

(March 23, 2018 at 11:28 am)Shell B Wrote: Oh, come on. A post quite that self-aggrandizing isn't common here, or anywhere else. It practically begs to be criticized. Part of me hopes he was being sarcastically smug, because that would actually be pretty funny.

I'm pretty sure he was just playing it up a bit to be funny, for the most part. The first time I saw him do it was aimed towards me and I hated him for months until I figured him out lol.

Still harsh though, considering the circumstances.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
(March 23, 2018 at 11:16 am)Hammy Wrote:
(March 23, 2018 at 11:11 am)wallym Wrote: If the choice was this person and nobody ever, it'd be a different decision.  Then I'd start rationalizing using the arguments your making.  Well, it's not a penis anymore.  And it looks like a normal vagina.  It's an unrealistic hypothetical about a different version of me, so who knows where I'd end up.

The point is, if every time you think of the person you're attracted to you are triggered to think about something else you find unattractive because reasons... that doesn't mean you are no longer attracted to the person when it has absolutely nothing to do with it.

If I love apple pies but every time I think of one I'm reminded of dog shit and feel yucky and don't feel in the mood for apple pie.... that doesn't mean I don't like apple pies even if I am completely convinced that it does mean that and  I say "apple pies are ruined for me" (that's deluded they're not ruined for me at all, I just keep thinking about dog shit. The experience of enjoying tasty apple pie is ruined, but I still like apple pie, I'm just not able to access that experience anymore because dog shit), it means I don't like dog shit, it doesn't mean that I don't like apple pie, and it means that something weird and irrelevant has triggered that thinking-about-dogshit response in me.

And in the case of transwomen, I think transphobia has triggered it.

If the apple pie was baked in a tin that used to be used for collecting dog shit.  But you know the tin has been cleaned and has no more dogshit on it.  But you'd still have that association.  At one point the tin was filled with dogshit.  Maybe someone even has a picture of pie plate filled with dogshit.  If you could just go get a apple pie baked on a non dogshit tin, and you did instead of eating out of the dogshit tin, I don't think that'd be weird.

Wanting a vagina that was never a penis doesn't seem radical.  I'd almost say it's more homophobic than transphobic.  

For example, if it was a supermodel biological female, who identified as a man, but had no intentions of going through any surgeries.  Making that work would be a completely different set of issues compared to the penis issue.  That would be a 'gender' situation.  The penis-vagina situation would be a biological hangup.
Reply
RE: Question for the heterosexual men of AF
(March 23, 2018 at 10:57 am)Shell B Wrote:
(March 23, 2018 at 10:51 am)The Industrial Atheist Wrote: I read a book about CBT one time. Well I read part of it. But one of the main points was when you tell yourself "Stop thinking about that. Stop thinking about that." it doesn't help because when you tell yourself that, you are necessarily thinking about what you don't want to think about. It's particularly bad when you start feeling guilty about not being able to stop thinking about whatever it is. It's better to accept it and not judge yourself. When you do that, often those thoughts seem to lessen. I've had minimal or no intrusive thoughts for most of my life, but I've found this works well with other thoughts I don't particularly want to have.

But yeah you don't really have control over your thoughts.

It's actually what makes OCD so difficult. You have to learn to just have the thought. The more you try to fight it, the worse it gets.

I may not have experienced the exact same thing, but a few times the intrusive thoughts got bad. It must be very challenging and I can imagine, sometimes painful. You have my sympathies.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The prevalence of HIV among gay men darnwelling 30 1996 January 11, 2023 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: darnwelling
  A question for the straight men Catholic_Lady 87 13037 January 11, 2023 at 3:44 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Little green men just got real. ignoramus 87 7599 July 7, 2021 at 4:28 pm
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  The army is one of the best examples of gender inequality towards MEN Macoleco 64 5608 February 18, 2021 at 8:04 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Real Men onlinebiker 111 5869 January 28, 2020 at 5:28 pm
Last Post: tackattack
  Men who don't flush public toilets Alexmahone 32 3271 April 25, 2018 at 10:14 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  men and women with tattoos, hot or not? orthodox-man 110 21587 April 24, 2018 at 8:12 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Men: How do You Define Yourself? Rhondazvous 33 2678 April 3, 2018 at 5:51 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Men's Rights Movement Catholic_Lady 538 70549 January 1, 2018 at 11:54 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Do Women Need Men? Rhondazvous 57 6457 July 26, 2017 at 11:04 am
Last Post: Shell B



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)