In a 5-4 decision SCOTUS upholds President Trump's travel ban on some Muslim countries....

www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/26/supreme-court-upholds-trump-travel-ban-on-some-muslim-majority-nations.html

And I'm sure none of them are Saudi Arabia, who had a hand in the attack on 9-11.

(June 26, 2018 at 12:00 pm)A Theist Wrote: In a 5-4 decision SCOTUS upholds President Trump's travel ban on some Muslim countries....

www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/26/supreme-court-upholds-trump-travel-ban-on-some-muslim-majority-nations.html

Why the fuck are you bragging about a regressive decision? First off it was not a slam dunk,  it was split 5-4. 

Secondly our same institution long ago upheld slave ownership and segregation. 

This isn't about national security, this is about our right wing living in the past.

(June 26, 2018 at 12:34 pm)Chad32 Wrote: And I'm sure none of them are Saudi Arabia, who had a hand in the attack on 9-11.

Gotta get dat oil money

(June 26, 2018 at 12:34 pm)Chad32 Wrote: And I'm sure none of them are Saudi Arabia, who had a hand in the attack on 9-11.

The ban revolved around the idea that people's identifications from certain countries couldn't be verified due to the state of disarray in that country.

Chad (the country) for example, was on the ban list.  But they seemed to have fixed the cause for concern enough that they got off the ban list.  I don't think they stopped being a primarily Muslim country.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/04/t...52785.html

The idea of Saudi Arabia doesn't make sense, because people are misrepresenting what the travel ban was to begin with.

That's not breaking Trumps filled the court with his lackeys and stupid ones some of whom can't answer a simple legal question of course they will uphold his stupid law .

This is why elections matter, Snowflakes.

(June 26, 2018 at 1:23 pm)henryp Wrote:

(June 26, 2018 at 12:34 pm)Chad32 Wrote: And I'm sure none of them are Saudi Arabia, who had a hand in the attack on 9-11.

The ban revolved around the idea that people's identifications from certain countries couldn't be verified due to the state of disarray in that country.

Chad (the country) for example, was on the ban list.  But they seemed to have fixed the cause for concern enough that they got off the ban list.  I don't think they stopped being a primarily Muslim country.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/04/t...52785.html

The idea of Saudi Arabia doesn't make sense, because people are misrepresenting what the travel ban was to begin with.

I think that Chad was on the list because it couldn't get the right paper for its passports.  Someone was playing a game with them.

Can we get a travel ban on Christian countries now then? I mean most of the murders in this country are committed by Christians.

Why do people try to make this a Muslim thing? There are many Muslim countries not on the list. I heard recently that the largest populations of Muslims are in south East Asia.