(October 1, 2018 at 6:00 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote: LOL... Your mother is a known open white supremacist...

You think I just select people at random for no reason?

(March 22, 2015 at 10:57 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(March 22, 2015 at 9:29 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: ...Huggy is one of those "We need to return to the gold standard!" nitwits, isn't he?

I think he just likes his "bling-bling". It's quite common for simple people to judge things on the basis of how shiny they are. If it were up to them - all the financial transactions would be conducted using golden chains and rims for currency...

When you judge a whole race of people based on stereotypes (gold chains and rims), yeah, you're an open white supremacist at that point.

(October 1, 2018 at 3:15 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(October 1, 2018 at 1:33 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: You are mistaken, as is frequently the case.  Honestly, this bogus qualification of your former accusation is pathetic.  You implied, based on what I had said (and you bolded my words for clarity), that I was entertaining the idea that blacks have an inherently lower IQ and then stated that only a racist would entertain such an idea.  It's pretty fucking plain, Huggy, as is your lying about it.

Ok, explain why you weren't included in the following post and why you gave it a kudos, because you never kudos any of my posts.

I can only assume you were thinking I was including you in the group of white supremacists.

(June 27, 2018 at 5:12 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Alexmahone, Homeless Nutter, and Paulpablo.

It could have been because I hadn't kudos'd any of his posts (you specifically limited it to people who had), or because you didn't consider me an open, known white supremacist but rather a closet one, or it could have been because I was the one asking the question and so didn't need myself pointed out. Any of those reasons would qualify. That you can't see that I obviously am not in that group because I didn't kudos a post makes me question your intelligence. I gave that particular post about the three supposed white supremacists a kudos because I appreciated the straightforward honesty and courage of naming them, when you could have been otherwise (as you sometimes are). Perhaps you don't understand the point that has been repeatedly made on this forum that a kudos isn't necessarily an indication of any one particular sentiment and can be given for any reason.

You've obviously made accusations of racism against me. Either you were being dishonest then in making them, or you're being dishonest now in denying them.

(August 10, 2018 at 5:39 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:

(August 10, 2018 at 5:21 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: No, just pointing out that you're an idiot who thinks things that aren't true. But lol right back, for thinking I was drawing any larger conclusions.

Says the person who believes black people inherently have low I.Q.s ...

Is a person who believes black people inherently have low I.Q.s racist or not?

Either they are, and you are clearly saying that I am racist here, or they are not, and you're saying that you have no reason to suspect that I'm a racist for my comments in that thread about race and I.Q., making your claim in that thread about me and white supremacy a groundless slur. If the latter is the case, then you clearly throw the white supremacist label at people for no reason and just to get an edge in conversations. No matter which way you turn, Huggy, you're either full of shit, or you're a piece of crap.

(October 1, 2018 at 8:06 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(March 22, 2015 at 10:57 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote: I think he just likes his "bling-bling". It's quite common for simple people to judge things on the basis of how shiny they are. If it were up to them - all the financial transactions would be conducted using golden chains and rims for currency...

When you judge a whole race of people based on stereotypes (gold chains and rims), yeah, you're an open white supremacist at that point.

What was that you were saying?

(October 1, 2018 at 8:53 am)Joods Wrote:

(October 1, 2018 at 8:06 am)Huggy74 Wrote: When you judge a whole race of people based on stereotypes (gold chains and rims), yeah, you're an open white supremacist at that point.

What was that you were saying?

What's your point?

---

(October 1, 2018 at 8:37 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(October 1, 2018 at 3:15 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Ok, explain why you weren't included in the following post and why you gave it a kudos, because you never kudos any of my posts.

I can only assume you were thinking I was including you in the group of white supremacists.

It could have been because I hadn't kudos'd any of his posts (you specifically limited it to people who had), or because you didn't consider me an open, known white supremacist but rather a closet one, or it could have been because I was the one asking the question and so didn't need myself pointed out.  Any of those reasons would qualify.  That you can't see that I obviously am not in that group because I didn't kudos a post makes me question your intelligence.  I gave that particular post about the three supposed white supremacists a kudos because I appreciated the straightforward honesty and courage of naming them, when you could have been otherwise (as you sometimes are).  Perhaps you don't understand the point that has been repeatedly made on this forum that a kudos isn't necessarily an indication of any one particular sentiment and can be given for any reason.

You've obviously made accusations of racism against me.  Either you were being dishonest then in making them, or you're being dishonest now in denying them.

(August 10, 2018 at 5:39 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Says the person who believes black people inherently have low I.Q.s ...

Is a person who believes black people inherently have low I.Q.s racist or not?

Either they are, and you are clearly saying that I am racist here, or they are not, and you're saying that you have no reason to suspect that I'm a racist for my comments in that thread about race and I.Q., making your claim in that thread about me and white supremacy a groundless slur.  If the latter is the case, then you clearly throw the white supremacist label at people for no reason and just to get an edge in conversations.  No matter which way you turn, Huggy, you're either full of shit, or you're a piece of crap.

Do you believe black people have inherently low IQ's?

Sorry Huggy, but your video doesn't show that Tiger Woods was abused by his wife.

(October 1, 2018 at 8:06 am)Huggy74 Wrote: You think I just select people at random for no reason?

LOL... No. I think you're an anal retentive narcissist, who keeps bringing up a single old joke, in order to malign me, because you're butt-hurt about how dumb I make you look, whenever I bother to indulge you...

(October 1, 2018 at 8:06 am)Huggy74 Wrote: When you judge a whole race of people based on stereotypes (gold chains and rims), yeah, you're an open white supremacist at that point.

No, dimwit. If I judged "a whole race", that might make me a racist. But I wasn't judging a "whole race" - I was judging you. And there's nothing in that post, that suggests superiority of white race - only your inferiority as an individual...

(October 1, 2018 at 11:11 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(October 1, 2018 at 8:06 am)Huggy74 Wrote: You think I just select people at random for no reason?

LOL... No. I think you're an anal retentive narcissist, who keeps bringing up a single old joke, in order to malign me, because you're butt-hurt about how dumb I make you look, whenever I bother to indulge you...

(October 1, 2018 at 8:06 am)Huggy74 Wrote: When you judge a whole race of people based on stereotypes (gold chains and rims), yeah, you're an open white supremacist at that point.

No, dimwit. If I judged "a whole race", that might make me a racist. But I wasn't judging a "whole race" - I was judging you. And there's nothing in that post, that suggests superiority of white race - only your inferiority as an individual...

Ok,  then what did you mean by referring to me as "they"? Also what about me says "gold chains" and "rims"?

---

(October 1, 2018 at 10:50 am)Shell B Wrote: Sorry Huggy, but your video doesn't show that Tiger Woods was abused by his wife.

Did you watch the video?

REPORTER: The car was driveable so why did she have to bash it in with a golf club, the back window?

OFFICER: From our understanding she explained to the officers that the doors were locked and she could not gain entry, so she used the golf club to smash the window out to gain entry to unlock the door

REPORTER: Did she have a golf club with her at the time?

OFFICER: I don't know where the golf club came from.

REPORTER: I mean she went back so she could of gotten the keys to open the door.

OFFICER: It sounds like that's probably what you'd do.

REPORTER: This sounds to me... i certainly don't want to put words in your mouth... but does this sound a little unusual, suspicious this case?

OFFICER: It sounds unusual, but like I said we're not the investigating agency.

It sounds like Tiger didn't want to come forward about the abuse suffered at the hands of his wife because he was scared...

(October 1, 2018 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: It sounds like Tiger didn't want to come forward about the abuse suffered at the hands of his wife because he was scared...

Re this: That implies that she was abusing him constantly, which there is no evidence of. Yes she smashed his car up with a golf club, [I believe the media reported that at the time], but he personally didn't want to report her/this action to the police.

Now the question is: Why is that? Well, maybe it's because she'd just found out he'd been cheating on his wife with a multitude of women, and she was very pissed off. Does that mean it's right? No, not at all. But did he not report that to the police because he thought he deserved it? Probably yes. Now I would never do this, not because I'm a man and I think hitting women is wrong, but because I'm a man and thinking hitting ANYBODY is wrong. Some people will fly into a rage when their lives have been pissed on, and the person they loved/thought was faithful their entire marriage goes and royally fucks it up. So you can sort of see what was going on there.

I came into this thread for the Cosby stuff, as I genuinely know very little about it, but fuck me sideways if there's pages and pages of nonsense about really random shit. I guess I'll have to keep an eye on you Huggy 

(October 1, 2018 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Ok,  then what did you mean by referring to me as "they"?

I used a gender-neutral pronoun, in case you were a "tranny"...

But seriously - if you were at a sufficiently high reading level, you'd be able to process more than one sentence at a time. "They" clearly refers to the subject of the previous sentence. I'll let you figure out what it was for yourself - teach a man how to fish, and all that...

(October 1, 2018 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Also what about me says "gold chains" and "rims"?

You're stupid, for one thing... And in that particular discussion, from which you quoted me - we were talking about gold and gold standard, of which you seemed a fan.

Anyway - I don't really give sh*t, if you think I'm a KKK member. I just find it funny, that you desperately hold on to one post and think it somehow exposes me as a bigot and invalidates all the times I made you look a fool... Whatever helps you sleep at night.

Huggy, you said she attacked "him" with a golf club, not his car. That's an entirely other situation. You inferred that she abused him, but he's never said she did. She hit his car because she was mad about his flagrant cheating. I'd have smashed his fucking car too. Dickhead.