Mind boggling! So much good shit coming out. This, the Peter Jackson epic Mortal Engines, the 4 new Avatars (first one in 2020, 2&3, 4&5 will be made back to back at a cost of 1b each!

(November 25, 2018 at 4:26 am)ignoramus Wrote: Mind boggling! So much good shit coming out. This, the Peter Jackson epic Mortal Engines, the 4 new Avatars (first one in 2020, 2&3, 4&5 will be made back to back at a cost of 1b each!

That video has nothing to do with the thread.

Iggi, Iggy, Iggy.

Shakes head.

Oops! I deleted the wrong double post!

But please check this out!

(November 25, 2018 at 4:26 am)ignoramus Wrote: Mind boggling! So much good shit coming out. This, the Peter Jackson epic Mortal Engines, the 4 new Avatars (first one in 2020, 2&3, 4&5 will be made back to back at a cost of 1b each!

I saw that trailer when I saw Bohemian Rhapsody the other day, and the biggest question: Did they cast Alita for how disproportionately huge her eyes are? Okay, looking this up, it appears that Rosa Salazar does not, in fact, have eyes that huge in real life, and is actually a 33-year old woman playing a robot who looks like a small girl. It's amazing how the only abnormality I found was those eyes, and, it turns out those are entirely intentional on Robert Rodriguez' part. Yes, Virginia, MoCap has come a Hell of a long way since Mars Needs Moms.

Why are they making more Avatar movies lmao

(November 25, 2018 at 5:43 pm)Aegon Wrote: Why are they making more Avatar movies lmao

Because, for a few years, it was the highest-grossing film of all time, and James Cameron planned several sequels from the beginning.

(November 25, 2018 at 5:48 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(November 25, 2018 at 5:43 pm)Aegon Wrote: Why are they making more Avatar movies lmao

Because, for a few years, it was the highest-grossing film of all time, and James Cameron planned several sequels from the beginning.

It was a pretty forgettable movie IMO. I can't even tell you any of the characters' names. Was the plot basically just Pocahontas? I guess the 3D was cool for 2009?

(November 25, 2018 at 9:45 pm)Aegon Wrote:

(November 25, 2018 at 5:48 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Because, for a few years, it was the highest-grossing film of all time, and James Cameron planned several sequels from the beginning.

It was a pretty forgettable movie IMO. I can't even tell you any of the characters' names. Was the plot basically just Pocahontas? I guess the 3D was cool for 2009?

Technically, it was more Dances with Wolves. Apparently, he wrote the initial treatment in 1994, but had the idea in his head for decades before that, and he waited until he had A) the clout to sell the project, and B) the technology to pull it off to his satisfaction. I can only assume that plot was more original when he was originally writing it.

I'm fairly certain the 3D was the major draw that ensured it broke the box office records.

(November 25, 2018 at 4:35 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Oops! I deleted the wrong double post!

But please check this out!

(November 25, 2018 at 4:26 am)ignoramus Wrote: Mind boggling! So much good shit coming out. This, the Peter Jackson epic Mortal Engines, the 4 new Avatars (first one in 2020, 2&3, 4&5 will be made back to back at a cost of 1b each!

Should have used this for the music in that trailer (1.44 for the sample) it's like set in the future and stuff