Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 15, 2019 at 11:08 pm
(February 15, 2019 at 7:38 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (February 15, 2019 at 6:19 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: It's "descended" not descendant. A "descendant" is someone who is descended from ...
No wonder you have no grasp of science.
You really are one dumb-ass uneducated ignoramus.
You have no evidence for that claim. In fact DNA proves it's not true.
There was no "first human". Evolution is a process, and over a long period, humans became closer to what they are now.
They (some) also have Neanderthal genes.
This is a problem for CDF. He does not grasp that populations evolve, individuals do not. In evolutionary terms. However, the term has been hijacked in popular parlance to imply individuals by the religious. Thus CDF is familiar with terms like "personally evolving", "spiritualy evolving" and such like bullshit.
In scientific parlance, evolving has a much stricter meaning and CDF simply cannot grok that.
He has so miserable an opinion of himself and so misanthropic that he will not grasp anything that doesn’t come with a promise to “save” him.
Posts: 1001
Threads: 12
Joined: October 20, 2017
Reputation:
23
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 16, 2019 at 12:05 pm
(February 15, 2019 at 9:55 am)Gwaithmir Wrote: I'm beginning to wonder if CDF47 is a Ken Ham sycophant, or maybe a Ken Ham clone. 
If he starts asking for donations to build a giant 'God creating DNA' theme park we will know.
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'
Posts: 8267
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 16, 2019 at 12:59 pm
(This post was last modified: February 16, 2019 at 1:07 pm by Pat Mustard.)
(February 15, 2019 at 9:55 am)Gwaithmir Wrote: I'm beginning to wonder if CDF47 is a Ken Ham sycophant, or maybe a Ken Ham clone.
Given his name he's more Joseph "I was never a nazi, just a member of their organisations for 11 years" Ratzinger.
(February 15, 2019 at 5:32 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (February 15, 2019 at 11:33 am)CDF47 Wrote: Ken Ham is YEC. I am an OEC.
You can't both be right, so at least one of you must be be wrong and likely both.
Which is it?
Well we know Mr Inquisition is lying. If he were oec he wouldn't be pushing the Adam and Eve line. Oec's realise that the Genesis creation myths are both garbage and that there never was an Adam and Eve. They think god's role is more akin to Jean Luc Picard in All Good Things... when he stirred his fingers in the pile of goo or Rincewind in Faust Eric when he left his egg and cress sandwich behind, viz god got the process started but pretty much let it go its own way afterwards.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 16, 2019 at 4:09 pm
Posts: 2741
Threads: 2
Joined: May 4, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2019 at 11:41 am by CDF47.)
(February 15, 2019 at 5:21 pm)Gwaithmir Wrote: (February 15, 2019 at 11:33 am)CDF47 Wrote: Ken Ham is YEC. I am an OEC. Nobody cares. 
Then don't compare me to him.
(February 15, 2019 at 5:32 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (February 15, 2019 at 11:33 am)CDF47 Wrote: Ken Ham is YEC. I am an OEC.
You can't both be right, so at least one of you must be be wrong and likely both.
Which is it?
Science shows OEC is right.
(February 15, 2019 at 6:19 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: It's "descended" not descendant. A "descendant" is someone who is descended from ...
No wonder you have no grasp of science.
You really are one dumb-ass uneducated ignoramus.
You have no evidence for that claim. In fact DNA proves it's not true.
There was no "first human". Evolution is a process, and over a long period, humans became closer to what they are now.
They (some) also have Neanderthal genes.
Prove it. You can't. You speak pseudo science.
(February 16, 2019 at 12:59 pm)Nomad Wrote: (February 15, 2019 at 9:55 am)Gwaithmir Wrote: I'm beginning to wonder if CDF47 is a Ken Ham sycophant, or maybe a Ken Ham clone.
Given his name he's more Joseph "I was never a nazi, just a member of their organisations for 11 years" Ratzinger.
(February 15, 2019 at 5:32 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: You can't both be right, so at least one of you must be be wrong and likely both.
Which is it?
Well we know Mr Inquisition is lying. If he were oec he wouldn't be pushing the Adam and Eve line. Oec's realise that the Genesis creation myths are both garbage and that there never was an Adam and Eve. They think god's role is more akin to Jean Luc Picard in All Good Things... when he stirred his fingers in the pile of goo or Rincewind in Faust Eric when he left his egg and cress sandwich behind, viz god got the process started but pretty much let it go its own way afterwards.
Wrong. Most OEC do not believe in a common ancestry with monkeys.
(February 16, 2019 at 4:09 pm)Jackalope Wrote: I'll just leave this here
https://youtu.be/u9bk2MrMGaA
Thanks...LOL
Posts: 8267
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 17, 2019 at 2:17 pm
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2019 at 2:17 pm by Pat Mustard.)
@ Mr Inquisition:
Your every other word in this thread is a lie, why should I believe you re oec's. Especially as I know quite a few. The oec viewpoint is theistic evolution, ie god meant for humans to descend (or in the oec mind, ascend) from apes*.
* And not monkeys as you so mendaciously assert. Lying constantly about evolution might work amongst your fellow yecs at the "discovery" "institute" but not here where we pay attention to reality.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 3021
Threads: 12
Joined: October 1, 2018
Reputation:
20
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 17, 2019 at 3:59 pm
(February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am)CDF47 Wrote: (February 15, 2019 at 5:21 pm)Gwaithmir Wrote: Nobody cares.
Then don't compare me to him.
You are simply a different species of creatard than Ham, but you are still a creatard and I shall compare you to him all I like.
Modern evolutionary theory doesn't claim that humans descended from monkeys but, like it or not, we do share common ancestors. Get an education! Like Ham's beliefs, yours are based upon creationist pseudoscience and a book of mythology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution
"The world is my country; all of humanity are my brethren; and to do good deeds is my religion." (Thomas Paine)
Posts: 2278
Threads: 9
Joined: October 3, 2013
Reputation:
25
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 17, 2019 at 7:50 pm
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2019 at 7:54 pm by Bucky Ball.)
Quote:Quote:It's "descended" not descendant. A "descendant" is someone who is descended from ...
No wonder you have no grasp of science.
You really are one dumb-ass uneducated ignoramus.
You have no evidence for that claim. In fact DNA proves it's not true.
There was no "first human". Evolution is a process, and over a long period, humans became closer to what they are now.
They (some) also have Neanderthal genes.
Prove it. You can't. You speak pseudo science.
Too bad for you, it's you that's full of crap.
You are the very definition of pseudo-science. You and your snake-oil salesmen.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...-ancestor/
You have no converts.
No one buys your garbage.
Every minute here, for you is wasted time.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Posts: 2872
Threads: 8
Joined: October 4, 2017
Reputation:
22
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 17, 2019 at 7:54 pm
(February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am)CDF47 Wrote: (February 15, 2019 at 5:21 pm)Gwaithmir Wrote: Nobody cares.
Then don't compare me to him. You are exactly like him.
(February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am)CDF47 Wrote: (February 15, 2019 at 5:32 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: You can't both be right, so at least one of you must be be wrong and likely both.
Which is it?
Science shows OEC is right. Lie. Science shows the exact opposite. You know this so it can only be an intentional lie.
(February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am)CDF47 Wrote: (February 15, 2019 at 6:19 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: It's "descended" not descendant. A "descendant" is someone who is descended from ...
No wonder you have no grasp of science.
You really are one dumb-ass uneducated ignoramus.
You have no evidence for that claim. In fact DNA proves it's not true.
There was no "first human". Evolution is a process, and over a long period, humans became closer to what they are now.
They (some) also have Neanderthal genes.
Prove it. You can't. You speak pseudo science. The DNA evidence is long established. Why are you cherry-picking? Especially when you clearly have not a clue what DNA shows. You claim that the DNA evidence shows an adam and eve origin when it clearly does not. You reject common ancestry when the DNA shows that we clearly do have a common ancestor.
That's 5 blatant lies.
1. DNA proves adam and eve
2. DNA does not prove common ancestry
3. Neanderthal genes do not exist
4. There was a first human
5. It can't be proven when it actually has
Count them. 5 lies in one go
Have you no shame at all?
(February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am)CDF47 Wrote: (February 16, 2019 at 12:59 pm)Nomad Wrote: Given his name he's more Joseph "I was never a nazi, just a member of their organisations for 11 years" Ratzinger.
Well we know Mr Inquisition is lying. If he were oec he wouldn't be pushing the Adam and Eve line. Oec's realise that the Genesis creation myths are both garbage and that there never was an Adam and Eve. They think god's role is more akin to Jean Luc Picard in All Good Things... when he stirred his fingers in the pile of goo or Rincewind in Faust Eric when he left his egg and cress sandwich behind, viz god got the process started but pretty much let it go its own way afterwards.
Wrong. Most OEC do not believe in a common ancestry with monkeys. That is blatant horseshit. RCC is the single biggest christian denomination and they accept it while being OEC. Face it. You are not OEC at all.
Make that lie #6
Posts: 2741
Threads: 2
Joined: May 4, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
February 18, 2019 at 1:40 am
(This post was last modified: February 18, 2019 at 1:45 am by CDF47.)
(February 17, 2019 at 2:17 pm)Nomad Wrote: @ Mr Inquisition:
Your every other word in this thread is a lie, why should I believe you re oec's. Especially as I know quite a few. The oec viewpoint is theistic evolution, ie god meant for humans to descend (or in the oec mind, ascend) from apes*.
* And not monkeys as you so mendaciously assert. Lying constantly about evolution might work amongst your fellow yecs at the "discovery" "institute" but not here where we pay attention to reality.
Yeah yeah from apes I know. Dr. Steven Meyer believes in oec and not in a common descent from apes.
(February 17, 2019 at 7:50 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Quote:Prove it. You can't. You speak pseudo science.
Too bad for you, it's you that's full of crap.
You are the very definition of pseudo-science. You and your snake-oil salesmen.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...-ancestor/
You have no converts.
No one buys your garbage.
Every minute here, for you is wasted time.
Some will see the truth. Others will be blind to it.
(February 17, 2019 at 7:54 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am)CDF47 Wrote: Then don't compare me to him. You are exactly like him.
(February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am)CDF47 Wrote: Science shows OEC is right. Lie. Science shows the exact opposite. You know this so it can only be an intentional lie.
(February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am)CDF47 Wrote: Prove it. You can't. You speak pseudo science. The DNA evidence is long established. Why are you cherry-picking? Especially when you clearly have not a clue what DNA shows. You claim that the DNA evidence shows an adam and eve origin when it clearly does not. You reject common ancestry when the DNA shows that we clearly do have a common ancestor.
That's 5 blatant lies.
1. DNA proves adam and eve
2. DNA does not prove common ancestry
3. Neanderthal genes do not exist
4. There was a first human
5. It can't be proven when it actually has
Count them. 5 lies in one go
Have you no shame at all?
(February 17, 2019 at 11:32 am)CDF47 Wrote: Wrong. Most OEC do not believe in a common ancestry with monkeys. That is blatant horseshit. RCC is the single biggest christian denomination and they accept it while being OEC. Face it. You are not OEC at all.
Make that lie #6
I am OEC.
|
