(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)madog Wrote:

(April 21, 2019 at 5:20 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote: If logical reasoning from true premises can never constitute evidence for you, then yes, a lot of evidence would necessarily be off the table, 

Logical reasoning is acceptable, as long as you don't smuggle shit into the arguement .....

I asked you to refute I can walk on water ..... and you failed, that doesn't prove I can walk on water.

Maybe use yours and your friends arugument style can prove I can walk on water ...


1) Whatever falls can be higher (False Premise)  Given gravity, there must be a point of first fall, any higher than which would not fall.  So higher than the point of first fall, that which first falls could not be higher.

2) If there is nothing solid higher then its floating

3) If you can float then you can walk on water

4) Therefore Madog can walk on water

---

(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.

(April 21, 2019 at 5:33 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote: Yes, well, I was asked to list a few of them.  I was assuming that because I was listing the arguments virtually by title and not by content, that anyone reading it would realize that when talking about logical reasoning from true premises was referring to the content of the actual arguments listed, rather than the list itself, which didn't actually include the content of the argument.  Is that a crazy thing to expect?

I did note your list.

I also see other's have offered rebuttals already, so there's that as well.

Plus, it would seem, that your points specifically rest on your premises actually being , y'know, correct..... Or, better yet, 'Real'.

Cheers.

Yeah, look into the arguments.  They've been made and not successfully rebutted today.  It's amazing...

Here's another list by someone I'm sure you're familiar with.  Look into each of the arguments he gives (there are numerous videos for each of the arguments by this specific gentleman).  You can see them done in the classroom and in debate forums where they go unrefuted for years on end.  

At work.

Oh fek me.

Master Craig.

*Sigh/groan*

I really don't want or need to wade through the Kalam atm.

Since I'm otherwise currently engaged.

(April 21, 2019 at 6:39 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.

Oh fek me.

Master Craig.

*Sigh/groan*

I really don't want or need to wade through the Kalam atm.

Since I'm otherwise currently engaged.

I read you loud & clear.  Handed what you asked for, and you're not interested!  Hahaha!  I get it....i get it.

(April 21, 2019 at 6:30 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote:

(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)madog Wrote: Logical reasoning is acceptable, as long as you don't smuggle shit into the arguement .....

I asked you to refute I can walk on water ..... and you failed, that doesn't prove I can walk on water.

Maybe use yours and your friends arugument style can prove I can walk on water ...


1) Whatever falls can be higher (False Premise)  Given gravity, there must be a point of first fall, any higher than which would not fall.  So higher than the point of first fall, that which first falls could not be higher.

2) If there is nothing solid higher then its floating

3) If you can float then you can walk on water

4) Therefore Madog can walk on water

---

(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.


I did note your list.

I also see other's have offered rebuttals already, so there's that as well.

Plus, it would seem, that your points specifically rest on your premises actually being , y'know, correct..... Or, better yet, 'Real'.

Cheers.

Yeah, look into the arguments.  They've been made and not successfully rebutted today.  It's amazing...

Here's another list by someone I'm sure you're familiar with.  Look into each of the arguments he gives (there are numerous videos for each of the arguments by this specific gentleman).  You can see them done in the classroom and in debate forums where they go unrefuted for years on end.  

So now we are stooping to such lows as co-opting the views of others in support of your argument.

Let's face it christard, you are fast losing this one but don't realise it because you are too dumb.

That's the problem with christards.  Too dumb to realise how dumb they really are.  Look up Dunning-Kruger, sonny.

Besides, shouldn't you be off to crutch, er church, with mommy and daddy.  It is, after all, 'man on a stick day'?

---

(April 21, 2019 at 6:30 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote:

(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)madog Wrote: Logical reasoning is acceptable, as long as you don't smuggle shit into the arguement .....

I asked you to refute I can walk on water ..... and you failed, that doesn't prove I can walk on water.

Maybe use yours and your friends arugument style can prove I can walk on water ...


1) Whatever falls can be higher (False Premise)  Given gravity, there must be a point of first fall, any higher than which would not fall.  So higher than the point of first fall, that which first falls could not be higher.

2) If there is nothing solid higher then its floating

3) If you can float then you can walk on water

4) Therefore Madog can walk on water

---

(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.


I did note your list.

I also see other's have offered rebuttals already, so there's that as well.

Plus, it would seem, that your points specifically rest on your premises actually being , y'know, correct..... Or, better yet, 'Real'.

Cheers.

Yeah, look into the arguments.  They've been made and not successfully rebutted today. 

Actually, they have been, many, many times before you began spouting your mindless and ill-devised fuckwittery.  You are just too stupid to realise.

I’m sorry, but are you really incapable of debating a Christian without stooping to calling them a retard? That’s kinda sad.

(April 21, 2019 at 6:53 am)Losty Wrote: I’m sorry, but are you really incapable of debating a Christian without stooping to calling them a retard? That’s kinda sad.

You're right. He should be using a thesaurus.

(April 21, 2019 at 6:53 am)Losty Wrote: I’m sorry, but are you really incapable of debating a Christian without stooping to calling them a retard? That’s kinda sad.

I do so hope that your post is a joke.

In your tag, whenever you post, you have an emoji that shows someone wanking and 'Jerkoff' in the title too.

Besides, christards insult humanity with their baseless bull shit and illogical and unproven nonsense.

I, in response, insult them right back.

(April 21, 2019 at 1:30 am)Thena323 Wrote:

(April 21, 2019 at 12:59 am)Godscreated Wrote: I believe it is a crying shame in this day and time that people have to use such words not make a point or anything else. People have no respect for others anymore and it will be the down fall of humanity. there is no reason to use such words even within a race of people it shows a lack of intelligence and a level of disrespect that goes beyond understanding or should I say goes below the level of understanding. Grow-up people and act like you are civilized instead of like the apes you believe you came from.

GC

Hello, GC.

Just wanted to inform that is now AF's unofficial N**GERmania thread. I know it doesn't make much sense considering the thread title, but you're actually off-topic.
This thread is for atheists to bemoan their inability to adequately satisfy their desperately-needed N**GER fixes.

(April 21, 2019 at 6:48 am)Lemon Curry Wrote:

(April 21, 2019 at 6:30 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote:

---

Yeah, look into the arguments.  They've been made and not successfully rebutted today.  It's amazing...

Here's another list by someone I'm sure you're familiar with.  Look into each of the arguments he gives (there are numerous videos for each of the arguments by this specific gentleman).  You can see them done in the classroom and in debate forums where they go unrefuted for years on end.  

So now we are stooping to such lows as co-opting the views of others in support of your argument.

Let's face it christard, you are fast losing this one but don't realise it because you are too dumb.

That's the problem with christards.  Too dumb to realise how dumb they really are.  Look up Dunning-Kruger, sonny.

Besides, shouldn't you be off to crutch, er church, with mommy and daddy.  It is, after all, 'man on a stick day'?

---

(April 21, 2019 at 6:30 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote:

---

Yeah, look into the arguments.  They've been made and not successfully rebutted today. 

Actually, they have been, many, many times before you began spouting your mindless and ill-devised fuckwittery.  You are just too stupid to realise.

Like I said, deal with the arguments and evidence.  Just calling someone names doesn't do anything to cover for your lack of intellectual curiosity.  I don't think I've ever dealt with any atheist who hasn't said essentially the same thing, but what I've also never seen......is an atheist who has actually attempted to grapple with the arguments & evidence.  I guess that's still the case, and I've been popping into places like this for 20 years or so now.  Amazing...!

(April 21, 2019 at 6:55 am)Kit Wrote:

(April 21, 2019 at 6:53 am)Losty Wrote: I’m sorry, but are you really incapable of debating a Christian without stooping to calling them a retard? That’s kinda sad.

You're right. He should be using a thesaurus.

How come there's only one word for thesaurus?