(July 30, 2019 at 5:48 pm)EgoDeath Wrote:

(July 30, 2019 at 2:39 am)Deesse23 Wrote: What you are descrbing is Rob (imho), yet you seem willing to make an exemption from your rule for him. You may want to think about this twice.

No, I'm not making an exemption for anyone. Did you read what I said?

Also, this thread was on another forum? And Amarok haughtily tells me "its not hard to find" and to figure it out. Lmao. What a clown.

1. Yes you were as predicted when faced with facts you invent excuses 

2.Lmao. I never said it was on this forum and even being on another it was super easy to find .So the walking three ring circus has no business calling anyone a clown you clown

---

(July 31, 2019 at 2:14 am)Deesse23 Wrote:

(July 30, 2019 at 5:48 pm)EgoDeath Wrote: No, I'm not making an exemption for anyone. Did you read what I said?

Also, this thread was on another forum? And Amarok haughtily tells me "its not hard to find" and to figure it out. Lmao. What a clown.

It was on AD (i accidentally wrote AF in my first post   )
Well, i guess it is easy to find there, other than that i would prefer not to get in between the lines of rob-haters and rob-lovers.

Nevertheless you wrote:

Quote:and I don't have patience for people who even entertain such garbage. 

...and Rob clearly entertains such garbage. Imho there is not much room for interpretation.


Imho he did something incredibly stupid, and there is no excuse for it, thats all.

It's easy to find online in general

(July 31, 2019 at 4:51 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: Skeptics ought to ask questions, not endorse ideologies.

(Sorry for the tangent but I had to get it off my chest.)

That’s exactly how white supremacy was laundered. They were JAQ-ing off, while competing for clicks in the crowded SJW market as search algorithms positively drove to extremist content- all of which produced revenue.

So, for example, those silly sjw would say something like “intelligence isn’t determined by race” and “skeptics” would say, well let’s see if that’s really true, not taking sides, just asking questions. A long winded uncritical scientific racism screed would follow.

Precisely because the presenters were not identifiable white supremacists, and the presented content was not described as the ravings of white supremacy, many viewers were left with the impression that this content was like any other skeptic content. It was given that provisional acceptance from a trusted and popular source. When parroted, that lead to endless rounds of “but I’m not a racist, the presenter isn’t a racist, my best friend isn’t s racist, my racist uncle isn’t s racist. My mommy isn’t a racist!”.

Standard information asymmetry, with a chaser of reflexive interpersonal defensiveness.

The freeze peach grift is the rights abrogation component of the narrative.

(July 31, 2019 at 9:17 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: So, for example, those silly sjw would say something like “intelligence isn’t determined by race” and “skeptics” would say, well let’s see if that’s really true, not taking sides, just asking questions.  

Just out of curiosity. Did anyone ever ask "Who cares?" as in "Who cares if intelligence is determined by race?" I mean, I don't care. (Not that my opinion matters.)

Quote:A long winded uncritical scientific racism screed would follow.

Just like Leviticus and Numbers. Maybe there really is "nothing new under the sun." YouTube is just the digital version of a bronze age scribe.

Quote:Precisely because the presenters were not identifiable white supremacists, and the presented content was not described as the ravings of white supremacy, many viewers were left with the impression that this content was like any other skeptic content.  

I consider essays by David Hume "skeptic content." If YouTube douchebaggery modeling itself as skepticism is how white supremacist ideology propagates itself nowadays, I can only point out that the real problem is that YouTube douchebaggery modeling itself as skepticism is something people consider worthwhile.

Let me tell you two things I know are facts: 1) Spellcheck acknowledges that "douchebaggery" is a word. No problem. I actually misspelled it. But spellcheck said, "No, no. This is how you spell douchebaggery. 2) People are right to accuse me of douchebaggery because I'm going to say I think all this is YouTube stuff is a problem because people take shadows on the wall of a cave to be reality. Sorry, y'all. But I think that's what up. Isn't that what's going on here? Aren't shadows being projected onto a wall and people saying, "OMG! This shit is real!"

Lol. That's what I think is happening. Call me a douchebag all you want.

(July 31, 2019 at 7:35 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: I don't ever seem to have heard a single atheist say something like "theists should burn and suffer for eternity because they don't agree with me." Have you ever heard a single atheist say anything like that?

Yes, atheists who were formerly Christian.

(July 31, 2019 at 9:48 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: Lol. That's what I think is happening. Call me a douchebag all you want.

Laundering white supremacy isn’t new. People have been trying to intellectualize it since forever.

David Hume was notoriously racist, so there’s no shelter there.

---

Quote:I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There never was a civilized nation of any other complexion than white, nor even any individual eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufacturer amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient German, the present Tartars, still have something eminent about them, in their valor, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction betwixt these breeds of men. Not to mention our colonies, there are Negro slaves dispersed all over Europe, of whom none ever discovered any symptoms of ingenuity; though low people, without education, will [229] start up amongst us, and distinguish themselves in every profession. In Jamaica, indeed, they talk of one Negro as a man of parts and learning; but it is likely he is admired for slender accomplishments, like a parrot who speaks a few words plainly.¹

---

Sound familiar?

(July 31, 2019 at 10:04 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: Laundering white supremacy isn’t new.  People have been trying to intellectualize it since forever.

David Hume was notoriously racist, so there’s no shelter there.

---

Quote:I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There never was a civilized nation of any other complexion than white, nor even any individual eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufacturer amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient German, the present Tartars, still have something eminent about them, in their valor, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction betwixt these breeds of men. Not to mention our colonies, there are Negro slaves dispersed all over Europe, of whom none ever discovered any symptoms of ingenuity; though low people, without education, will [229] start up amongst us, and distinguish themselves in every profession. In Jamaica, indeed, they talk of one Negro as a man of parts and learning; but it is likely he is admired for slender accomplishments, like a parrot who speaks a few words plainly.¹

Sound familiar?

Meh. IDK. I was more referring to Hume's skepticism than Hume himself. I disagree with Hume on almost everything. I am a bit surprised to learned he was such a dope about race. He's usually more astute.


Marx was a racist. That doesn't make Marxism a bad idea. Seeking shelter in 19th century intellectuals is bad praxis in general. Talk about a leaky roof.

YouTube is nothing but shadows on the wall of a cave. If you think any of it is real... you truly are fucked.

Humes skepticism didn’t seem to be operative on the subject. If a person referred to Hume as support for race realism rather than some other skeptic on YouTube, what would be different?

I’m not huge on YouTube, other than for awesome playlists, lol....but maybe you could engage your own skepticism and wonder whether your opinion here is colored by factual differences, or pure nostalgia? You preferred Hume and his skepticism. He was highly skeptical of negroes common humanity, to say the least.

That’s how this still works, on YouTube. Was Hume also peddling shadows on the wall of a cave? You can point to his better work, but so can fans if alt right YouTube nutters. Again, that’s the cover.

(July 31, 2019 at 10:54 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: I’m not huge on YouTube, other than for awesome playlists...

Did someone say awesome playlists?

(July 31, 2019 at 2:14 am)Deesse23 Wrote:

(July 30, 2019 at 5:48 pm)EgoDeath Wrote: No, I'm not making an exemption for anyone. Did you read what I said?

Also, this thread was on another forum? And Amarok haughtily tells me "its not hard to find" and to figure it out. Lmao. What a clown.

It was on AD (i accidentally wrote AF in my first post   )
Well, i guess it is easy to find there, other than that i would prefer not to get in between the lines of rob-haters and rob-lovers.

Nevertheless you wrote:

Quote:and I don't have patience for people who even entertain such garbage. 

...and Rob clearly entertains such garbage. Imho there is not much room for interpretation.


Imho he did something incredibly stupid, and there is no excuse for it, thats all.

And it is supposed to be easy to find for me, when I dont belong to other forum? Smdh.

And right, if that's indeed what rob is doing then I have no patience to listen to him about it. No one is making any exceptions.

---

(July 31, 2019 at 8:31 am)Amarok Wrote:

(July 30, 2019 at 5:48 pm)EgoDeath Wrote: No, I'm not making an exemption for anyone. Did you read what I said?

Also, this thread was on another forum? And Amarok haughtily tells me "its not hard to find" and to figure it out. Lmao. What a clown.

1. Yes you were as predicted when faced with facts you invent excuses 

2.Lmao. I never said it was on this forum and even being on another it was super easy to find .So the walking three ring circus has no business calling anyone a clown you clown

---

(July 31, 2019 at 2:14 am)Deesse23 Wrote: It was on AD (i accidentally wrote AF in my first post   )
Well, i guess it is easy to find there, other than that i would prefer not to get in between the lines of rob-haters and rob-lovers.

Nevertheless you wrote:

...and Rob clearly entertains such garbage. Imho there is not much room for interpretation.


Imho he did something incredibly stupid, and there is no excuse for it, thats all.

It's easy to find online in general

Jesus, just stop. You couldve easily said hey its here on this entirely different website, heres a link or ill pm you the link. *facepalm*

Quote:Jesus, just stop. You couldve easily said hey its here on this entirely different website, heres a link or ill pm you the link. *facepalm*

Stop stating the facts . I didn't need to say it was on a different site or provide you a link  if you didn't find it here the logical thing would have been to search elsewhere it's what I did and it was easy to freaking find .

---

Quote:And it is supposed to be easy to find for me, when I dont belong to other forum? Smdh.

Yup because it is easy to find