Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 11:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
By chance?
RE: By chance?
(February 3, 2020 at 3:36 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(February 3, 2020 at 3:18 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Yukon seems to have bailed out. Colour me all shade of surprised.

His last post was three hours ago. I’d hardly call that ‘bailed out.’

Boru

Not engaging with any response from anyone is bailing out.

A whole crapton of fact, science, evidence, experimentation and what have you has been presented. Not responding to that is most definitely "bailing out" in no short order. It is an abdication of one's brain.

To me it is rather simple. Humanity is a spectrum of ability.  Some are smarter, some are more athletic and so forth. As humans we recognise such difference and indeed rejoice int it. Or should.

Ask me to build and deploy a server for any give task and I am right there. Ask me to carve a chunk of wood and I am lost forever. Yet carpenters seem to do that with aplomb.

YJ is coming at it on the basis that if he cannot figure it out, then nobody can. That is blatant hubris.

Not to put too fine a point on it, I can write custom encryption routines all day long. Yet I cannot successfully cut a straight edge on a piece of wood.

One must always retain awareness of one's own limits.
Reply
RE: By chance?
Oh, ok - fair enough.  By ‘bailed out’ I thought you meant he left altogether (which wouldn’t be the worst thing). I take your point.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
RE: By chance?
(February 3, 2020 at 2:09 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I think YJ deserves a tip of the hat. When defending the idiocy of intelligent design, certain things are absolutely crucial.

-Maintain a strict, willful ignorance of evolution and how it operates.

-Never address the facts and arguments of your opponents.

-Repeat your misinformed opinion and false facts frequently.

-Don’t offer a mechanism for design.

-Above all, always substitute invective, bad language, and personal insults in place of actual debate.

YJ has adhered to these with a doggedness which would make a charging rhino gulp with disbelief.  Kirk Cameron would be proud.

Boru
Add 

Relies on the opinion of one scientist in face of the whole consensus 

Relies on logical fallacies
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
RE: By chance?
(February 3, 2020 at 5:36 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Relies on logical fallacies

I am not surprised.

When the use of fallacies can be made to seemingly support one's pet mythology or superstition, it is very seductive to continue to use them. Even more so, when the 'best apologists', with unjustified good reputations, use the same fallacies, it gives one even more reason to continue to use them.

"If William Lane Craig (he's got a PHd, right) makes the same argument, its got to be legit".

On a more granular level, the conclusions that come from fallacious reasoning can seem to make so much sense to the person making them. After all, we tend to live our lives using inference and induction, and they work so well. After all, today is almost like yesterday, and when we sat in that chair, or one very similar, it held me up.

The problem is, when someone tries to use inference and induction for claims that require deductive reasoning, like existential claims (existence of gods, for example), fallacies are unavoidable. Take ALL the arguments posted by theists in this entire thread, for example.

Or the Kalam cosmological argument.

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Reply
RE: By chance?
(February 3, 2020 at 7:35 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: "If William Lane Craig (he's got a PHd, right)
Unfortunately "yes", from a German university of all possible places. Faints
Being German i am truly embarrassed to admit. Blush
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
RE: By chance?
(January 16, 2020 at 8:48 pm)no one Wrote: So, in other words, your ancient fairy tale that was written by scientifically inept goat fucking troglodytes has no explanation for how life began other than the conjuring of a wish-granting magic sky wizard?
Unconscious stones got us to where we are now. These stones decided to get more complex after much discussion about the advantages.
Atheist Credo: An universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Reply
RE: By chance?
(February 4, 2020 at 2:33 pm)snowtracks Wrote:
(January 16, 2020 at 8:48 pm)no one Wrote: So, in other words, your ancient fairy tale that was written by scientifically inept goat fucking troglodytes has no explanation for how life began other than the conjuring of a wish-granting magic sky wizard?
Unconscious stones got us to where we are now. These stones decided to get more complex after much discussion about the advantages.

You fail at physics, chemistry, mathematics and biology. You should go for philosophy or theology. I recommend the latter it gives you acess to easy sheep. The former I would ask "yes I want fries with that".
Reply
RE: By chance?
(February 4, 2020 at 2:33 pm)snowtracks Wrote:
(January 16, 2020 at 8:48 pm)no one Wrote: So, in other words, your ancient fairy tale that was written by scientifically inept goat fucking troglodytes has no explanation for how life began other than the conjuring of a wish-granting magic sky wizard?
Unconscious stones got us to where we are now. These stones decided to get more complex after much discussion about the advantages.

Since when does a "righteous" (your description of yourself) person lie, by using straw man arguments?

I don't think that word means what you think it means...

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Reply
RE: By chance?
(February 3, 2020 at 4:34 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Oh, ok - fair enough.  By ‘bailed out’ I thought you meant he left altogether (which wouldn’t be the worst thing). I take your point.

Boru

Apologies, I was a little more forthright than intended. My fault, none of yours.

(February 4, 2020 at 2:33 pm)snowtracks Wrote:
(January 16, 2020 at 8:48 pm)no one Wrote: So, in other words, your ancient fairy tale that was written by scientifically inept goat fucking troglodytes has no explanation for how life began other than the conjuring of a wish-granting magic sky wizard?
Unconscious stones got us to where we are now. These stones decided to get more complex after much discussion about the advantages.

Yay. Let's all play pick the fallacy Bingo, why not?
Reply
RE: By chance?
[Image: icon_quote.jpg]This guy:
So, in other words, your ancient fairy tale that was written by scientifically inept goat fucking troglodytes has no explanation for how life began other than the conjuring of a wish-granting magic sky wizard?

[Image: icon_quote.jpg]Eric Hovind:
Unconscious stones got us to where we are now. These stones decided to get more complex after much discussion about the advantages.

Thanks for joining us, quarterwit. I'm surprised daddy lets you have any slack in that leash.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Abiogenesis ("Chemical Evolution"): Did Life come from Non-Life by Pure Chance. Nishant Xavier 55 3111 August 6, 2023 at 5:19 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  The argument of "chance" xr34p3rx 86 16434 February 24, 2015 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  A chance to do good without god Baalzebutt 8 3274 February 27, 2013 at 4:26 pm
Last Post: Baalzebutt
  Products of Chance Reasonable_Jeff 44 13603 September 26, 2012 at 5:08 pm
Last Post: Darkstar
  Logic of chance Ephrium 59 20001 August 27, 2009 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Violet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)