Apparently, the US needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt, or at least that's what Amy Coney Barrett in Alito's Draft claims.

Amy Coney Barrett's theme song:

(May 6, 2022 at 7:48 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(May 6, 2022 at 7:32 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: According tbe most recent progressive gender dogma, men can get pregnant. Just sayin'.

Neo, you’re far too intelligent to not understand the difference between biological sex and gender.

He's too bigoted to care about the fact that he's lying. Under all the nice soundijg verbiage neo-scholatic is a hate filled little man.

(May 7, 2022 at 2:12 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: Amy Coney Barrett's theme song:

She more of a Hörst Wessel Lied woman.

(May 7, 2022 at 1:00 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: Apparently, the US needs a “domestic supply of infants” to meet the needs of parents seeking to adopt, or at least that's what Amy Coney Barrett in Alito's Draft claims.

Here's an idea to solve the whole abortion debate: Any woman who gets pregnant under ANY set of circumstances and doesn't want the child should have the option to have the embryo removed and implanted in the uterus of a woman who has ever carried one of those 'Adopt, Don't Abort' placards at a protest. Since they've already shown that they don't care a fig for bodily autonomy, the recipients would not be allowed to refuse.

This would not only ensure a 'domestic supply of infants', but would drive home to the recipients what it's like to carry to term an infant against your will.

Boru

It ain't about babies.

Boru

(May 7, 2022 at 12:19 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:

(May 6, 2022 at 9:29 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: The implicit claim is more that biological males shouldn't be the only ones whose opinions are considered in abortion. Especially since A) bio-men aren't the ones who will be effected the most by the issue, and B) if graphs like these (the results of Gallup polls over the period of 46 years) are any indication, they may have some differing views on the issue than Alito (specifically: only 19% are inclined to agree with Alito on abortion.)

Which is a very good argument that the issue should have been allowed to resolve itself by democratic consensus in legilative bodies instead of being stalled by judicial fiat.

Sure, why don't we put basic rights up to a vote in each state. Have different rights depending upon where you live or happen to be. Can't see anything wrong with that.

(May 7, 2022 at 9:21 am)Angrboda Wrote:

(May 7, 2022 at 12:19 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Which is a very good argument that the issue should have been allowed to resolve itself by democratic consensus in legilative bodies instead of being stalled by judicial fiat.

Sure, why don't we put basic rights up to a vote in each state. Have different rights depending upon where you live or happen to be. Can't see anything wrong with that.

Just pointing out arguments of convenience. The person seemed to be saying that the draft court ruling was mistaken since, according to the poster's presented data, it was unpopular.

(May 4, 2022 at 7:42 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Someone would have been nominated and confirmed if RBG stepped down [...]

Merrick Garland's on line one, he'd like a word with you.