Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 29, 2024, 4:18 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science of Atheism
#41
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 8:19 pm)Ahriman Wrote:
(September 20, 2023 at 6:25 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: What a mindwobblingly stupid video. God isn’t ‘a different kind of explanation’. God is no explanation at all. It’s an excuse used by people who can’t count past ten with their shoes on.

Boru

Yeah man, I'm sure Thomas Aquinas, Saint Augustine, and many others were just dumb as rocks, definitely not intelligent people. I don't care if you don't believe in God, but do not call His followers stupid.

You’d prefer I call them halfwitted? Gullible? Moronic? Laughable? Naive? Senseless? Witless?

‘Stupid is as stupid does.’

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#42
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 8:21 pm)Data Wrote:
(September 20, 2023 at 8:03 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Hardly matters whether it's true.  Perhaps you know why you see science as a getabble, something that religion made?  Something that, even though you don't have it now, a god will just hand to you, somehow, as you indicated?

Here's the thing . . . and I vaguely remember you from when I first came here briefly. We had some interesting discussions. I don't recall if it went south as it always does, or I just got bored and left* but I have never had anything against science, but at the same time I've never had any interest in it. To me a dinosaur is a big lizard (taught that in old school, turns out it may have been a big chicken).Space, which is God's creation, is beautiful - for about 20 seconds. To me. But if I were temporary steward over the entire world until Jehovah sets up his kingdom, I would destroy politics and organized religion by taking away their financial incentive, money, fractional reserve banking, etc. and give science and technology, now uncorrupted, the power to provide for every man, woman and child on the planet. AND I would make it so any subsequent temporary ruler wouldn't be allowed to interfere with it with any other corrupted vehicle. The corrupted world is a dragon. The solution to the dragon isn't to fight or tame it, the solution is to starve it.  



* My getting bored isn't a reflection or criticism of you or the forum in general, it's a reflection of my having done this for way too long.
Yes, yes.  We are so impressed that you have put so many years into this and still suck at it.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
#43
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 8:19 pm)Ahriman Wrote: Yeah man, I'm sure Thomas Aquinas, Saint Augustine, and many others were just dumb as rocks, definitely not intelligent people. I don't care if you don't believe in God, but do not call His followers stupid.
Come meet my cousins in Arkansas. Rocks call them stupid. The snakes they handle call them stupid. Stupid calls them stupid.
Reply
#44
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 8:43 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote:
(September 20, 2023 at 8:19 pm)Ahriman Wrote: Yeah man, I'm sure Thomas Aquinas, Saint Augustine, and many others were just dumb as rocks, definitely not intelligent people. I don't care if you don't believe in God, but do not call His followers stupid.
Come meet my cousins in Arkansas. Rocks call them stupid. The snakes they handle call them stupid. Stupid calls them stupid.

I doubt they're stupid, it's just that they're not pretentious brainiacs.
"Imagination, life is your creation"
Reply
#45
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 8:52 pm)Ahriman Wrote:
(September 20, 2023 at 8:43 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Come meet my cousins in Arkansas. Rocks call them stupid. The snakes they handle call them stupid. Stupid calls them stupid.

I doubt they're stupid, it's just that they're not pretentious brainiacs.

87 is an average I saw.

And I'm no brainiac, I struggle along with my 128, and leave the heavy thinking to the eggheads.
Reply
#46
RE: Science of Atheism
Don't feel bad. I haven't done anything amazing with my 140ish quotient.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#47
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 8:26 pm)Data Wrote:
(September 20, 2023 at 8:20 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Have you read their stuff?  Yes.  They were dipshits.

I don't know about the others, but Aquinas certainly was. Bedrock for the church's geocentric theory. Not a Biblical teaching, by the way.

Actually it was. Some day when you have a chance look up what the Hebrew cosmos looed like. Google is your friend.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
#48
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 8:54 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: 87 is an average I saw.

And I'm no brainiac, I struggle along with my 128, and leave the heavy thinking to the eggheads.

(September 20, 2023 at 8:55 pm)Foxaèr Wrote: Don't feel bad. I haven't done anything amazing with my 140ish quotient.

You guys are so . . . weird. Compare Stephen Hawking (160) with, say, James Wood (180).
Reply
#49
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 8:55 pm)Foxaèr Wrote: Don't feel bad. I haven't done anything amazing with my 140ish quotient.

[Image: MSN-Emoticon-032.gif]
Reply
#50
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 9:01 pm)Data Wrote:
(September 20, 2023 at 8:54 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: 87 is an average I saw.

And I'm no brainiac, I struggle along with my 128, and leave the heavy thinking to the eggheads.

(September 20, 2023 at 8:55 pm)Foxaèr Wrote: Don't feel bad. I haven't done anything amazing with my 140ish quotient.

You guys are so . . . weird. Compare Stephen Hawking (160) with, say, James Wood (180).

If you don't use it it don't matter what it is. I turned down a seat at the Naval Academy Preparatory School because I couldn't pretend to be an officer.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Atheism VS Christian Atheism? IanHulett 80 29975 June 13, 2017 at 11:09 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Atheism, Scientific Atheism and Antitheism tantric 33 13719 January 18, 2015 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: helyott
  Strong/Gnostic Atheism and Weak/Agnostic Atheism Dystopia 26 12822 August 30, 2014 at 1:34 pm
Last Post: Dawsonite
  Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! Duke Guilmon 8 3666 April 27, 2014 at 6:53 pm
Last Post: MJ the Skeptical
  Debate share, young earth? atheism coverup? atheism gain? xr34p3rx 13 10927 March 16, 2014 at 11:30 am
Last Post: fr0d0
  Favorite videos on atheism or science? Clueless Morgan 10 4033 November 4, 2013 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: Napoléon
  Atheism, Theism, Science & Philosophy Love 213 66678 May 8, 2013 at 2:20 pm
Last Post: Love
  Would you be an atheist if science and reason wasn't supportive of atheism? Vincenzo Vinny G. 151 67338 December 9, 2012 at 4:27 pm
Last Post: Samson1
  A different definition of atheism. Atheism isn't simply lack of belief in god/s fr0d0 14 12577 August 1, 2012 at 2:54 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  "Old" atheism, "New"atheism, atheism 3.0, WTF? leo-rcc 69 40714 February 2, 2010 at 3:29 am
Last Post: tackattack



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)