Quote:work jointly on an activity, especially to produce or create something.

"he collaborated with a distinguished painter on the designs"

This is one dictionary definition. You know perfectly well that it is not the apt one for this conversation.

Nope it's perfectly apt you just don't like it. Well frankly Tough Tamales

Your responses work in only way, to your own advantage. That intellectual dishonesty is the sign of a bigot, albeit ones of some sophistication.

Fun fact. I knew a Jewish gentleman back in the '60s. He fought the Arabs for Palestine. He flew a Nazi airplane, the ME-109. (Bought in Europe after the war and smuggled into Palestine via Sicily (not enough onboard fuel storage to fly direct). He showed me a picture of a bunch of young men standing in front of a large building.

Me: Is that the King David Hotel?
Him: Yep.
Me: How long before it blew up?
Him: About five minutes.



I liked him.

(November 22, 2023 at 12:23 pm)The Architect Of Of Fate Wrote:

Quote:work jointly on an activity, especially to produce or create something.

"he collaborated with a distinguished painter on the designs"

This is one dictionary definition. You know perfectly well that it is not the apt one for this conversation.

Nope it's perfectly apt you just don't like it. Well frankly Tough Tamales

You were referring to an act of treachery, so the creativity definition is not at all apt. Once again, you demonstrate your intellectual dishonesty.

(November 22, 2023 at 1:19 pm)ColeDavis Wrote: Your responses work in only way, to your own advantage. That intellectual dishonesty is the sign of a bigot, albeit ones of some sophistication.

That makes zero sense. My definition is valid. You pouting about it doesn't change that .

But continue to scream bigot. I know my own mind and my own intentions thus your words have no impact 

Quote:You were referring to an act of treachery, so the creativity definition is not at all apt. Once again, you demonstrate your intellectual dishonesty.

Nope I was referring to exactly what I just pointed to and thus it is apt. You have shown no dishonesty except your own 

There are different definitions of the word. You are just adhering to one which - by nitpicking - will win you the argument - but has nothing to do with objectivity.

You ought to take up a religion. It suits such a flexible intellect.

Quote:There are different definitions of the word. You are just adhering to one which - by nitpicking - will win you the argument - but has nothing to do with objectivity.

I am aware of that. I am clearly referring to my intended use of the word which I have already stated and is valid. Therefore your accusation is empty. 

Quote:You ought to take up a religion. It suits such a flexible intellect.

How about no and again you have yet to do anything other then throw around baseless accusations