AI images of "modern jet fighters":



You want to trust your faith to something this sloppy? How sloppy is your thinking?

Organic stupidity will always beat artificial intelligence.

(September 4, 2024 at 9:41 pm)Mortalsfool Wrote: Nothing specific I can recall. My point in the use of AI is, it does provide sources for a mass amount of history's writings. In the service of combing thru its storage of information, it can prove to be pretty accurate in finding out if something you propose, was already written about by someone in the past. It will even provide referances as to where and when it was before.

I don't think AI is a good substitute for good old fashioned scholarship. You have to do the work.

(September 4, 2024 at 8:15 pm)Mortalsfool Wrote:

(September 4, 2024 at 7:59 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: From a passive fantasy about my death to an active one in which you are a satisfied observer.   

If being close minded is defined as not having a mind that wanders to fairies when considering my mortality you got me..though I don't see how that would be comparable to the faithful..as the difference between us (and apparently between you and I) is that your minds do.  You asked, I'm correcting your poor assumptions.  I'd suggest you go ahead and get all the canned gripes and complaints out of the way to make room for new ones.  I won't mind.

What amazes me, is all I was seeking in this forum, was someone that doesn't believe in an afterlife to look at the science in my proposal. I said above that I respect the fact you don't believe and would be better able to consider the science proposed than a believer would be. I assume that it is probable your observation of science founds your disbelief and find it incredible that you wouldn't want to know, if in fact, science could propose a logical view of creation which doesn't violate reason.

No. What you are is a low-tier troll who thinks he has a new fish hook to dangle.  Unfortunately, many of us have been around the net for some time and have seen your song and dance before.

The worst is that you're boring, You can't even make your stuff entertaining.

oof

Thoughts and prayers

RAmen

(September 4, 2024 at 10:11 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: AI images of "modern jet fighters":



You want to trust your faith to something this sloppy? How sloppy is your thinking?

AI must've been invented in Iran. 

(September 4, 2024 at 10:33 pm)Fireball Wrote:

(September 4, 2024 at 10:11 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: AI images of "modern jet fighters":



You want to trust your faith to something this sloppy? How sloppy is your thinking?

AI must've been invented in Iran. 

I'm surprised that any of those images still have cockpit on, they'd dig a ditch 30 seconds into takeoff-roll, if they got that far. Even AI should be able to see symmetry/asymmetry and the flight issues that causes.

It's this primitive, and yet OP wants to pin his faith on it. Whatever it takes, I guess.

(September 4, 2024 at 6:48 pm)Mortalsfool Wrote: I know from experience, that Atheists are somewhat difficult to present any believer’s view that would get at least some degree of consideration.

In my case, there is one thing - and one thing only - that would qualify as evidence for a god:  The god itself, in person, in the physical world.  As a result, the believer's view is irrelevant to me because it isn't what I'm looking for.

The OP is yet another who thinks that atheists have never considered his "revelation". Xtians are like wind-up toys with this attitude.

(September 4, 2024 at 6:48 pm)Mortalsfool Wrote: The gist of what I proposed, posits a harmonious and complementary use of the Laws of Science in creation.

How do you envision ever being able to "harmonize" science saying "x came before y" and Genesis saying "y came before x"?

This AI shit reminds me of the time disgraced YouTube pedo-hunter Mama Max was outed as incompetent because he tried to use ChatGPT for legal advice (about 65 minutes into this video):