Your marginal world views mean that you have to abandon common sense and understand everything else without proof as physical because "that's all we have proof of". It's a stand almost akin with idiocy given the illogicality of it. And you call it "sane" LMAO.

Translation = he has no evidence.

He just believes in bullshit because it makes him feel good to do so.

Go read up on it Minimalist. Evidence of God is a ludicrous requirement. Or you are illogical.

(August 23, 2009 at 3:42 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Go read up on it Minimalist. Evidence of God is a ludicrous requirement. Or you are illogical.

Do you beleive in the Matrix?

For fun yes. Seriously, no.

(August 23, 2009 at 2:29 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Your marginal world views mean that you have to abandon common sense and understand everything else without proof as physical because "that's all we have proof of". It's a stand almost akin with idiocy given the illogicality of it. And you call it "sane" LMAO.

Yet it can't quite seem as funny when I AGAIN point out that simple fact that the things you claim without evidence to exist show a consistent correlation with things that don't exist ... laugh all you like but you don't fucking deal with that do you?

Kyu

It's been dealt with to death Kyu. That you continue with it despite even you seemingly agreeing (in your previous post to me) beggars belief.

(August 23, 2009 at 2:29 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Your marginal world views mean that you have to abandon common sense and understand everything else without proof as physical because "that's all we have proof of". It's a stand almost akin with idiocy given the illogicality of it. And you call it "sane" LMAO.

I never mentioned proof. All I'm saying is that beliefs should be supported by evidence otherwise it's delusional because they by definition have nothing to support them.

(August 23, 2009 at 3:42 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Go read up on it Minimalist. Evidence of God is a ludicrous requirement. Or you are illogical.

Which is why you shouldn't believe. If there's no evidence then it's delusional to believe.

EvD

(August 23, 2009 at 8:19 am)fr0d0 Wrote: It's been dealt with to death Kyu. That you continue with it despite even you seemingly agreeing (in your previous post to me) beggars belief.

My previous but one answer? Er ... what part of ...

"Yeah, yeah, yeah ... you didn't answer the point I made, specifically ..."

and

"... and imply you've already answered it but that's what you always do isn't it?"

... implies I was agreeing with you?

Kyu

(August 23, 2009 at 9:55 am)EvidenceVsDelusion Wrote: I never mentioned proof. All I'm saying is that beliefs should be supported by evidence otherwise it's delusional because they by definition have nothing to support them.

So tell me the type of evidence you'll accept again and I'll tell you again and we can go around that particular merry-go-round once more. It's been presented to you clearly, you just refuse to see it. Not my problem I'm afraid. End.