(May 19, 2012 at 5:29 pm)Abishalom Wrote:

(May 19, 2012 at 5:26 pm)Tobie Wrote: This is true. However, there is an enormous amount of evidence that suggests so. One hell of a lot more than your competing theory, that everything was created by some magical being.

We'll just leave it at this then because the subsequent portion of your statement is just an outright lie.

Yes, he should have said "supernatural" being instead of "magical" being because there's a huge difference between the two.

This is one of the worst fear inspired cases of denial I've ever seen.

(May 19, 2012 at 5:36 pm)Tobie Wrote:

(May 19, 2012 at 5:29 pm)Abishalom Wrote: We'll just leave it at this then because the subsequent portion of your statement is just an outright lie.

No it isn't. You are a moron if you think any mainstream scientific theory isn't rigorously tested with mountains of evidence backing it up.

If it is a lie as you say, then you will have unequivocal evidence ( that will stand up to the scrutiny of being peer-reviewed ) for your creationist dogma. If that is the case, present it here.

"mountains of evidence"...? What "mountains of evidence" did they have to test this theory? There is no "mountains of evidence" for common descent. All the evidence we have points to the contrary.

(May 19, 2012 at 5:43 pm)Abishalom Wrote: "mountains of evidence"...? What evidence?

The genetic similarity for one. The fossil record is another. You have the internet. Use it.

(May 19, 2012 at 5:47 pm)Tobie Wrote:

(May 19, 2012 at 5:43 pm)Abishalom Wrote: "mountains of evidence"...? What evidence?

The genetic similarity for one. The fossil record is another. You have the internet. Use it.

I'm well of aware of what scientist claim with regards to the "evolution of apes to humans" and the alleged evidence. My point is that this "evidence" is not consistent with said claim.

(May 19, 2012 at 5:50 pm)Abishalom Wrote:

(May 19, 2012 at 5:47 pm)Tobie Wrote: The genetic similarity for one. The fossil record is another. You have the internet. Use it.

I'm well of aware of what scientist claim with regards to the "evolution of apes to humans" and the alleged evidence. My point is that this "evidence" is not consistent with said claim.

Yes it is. How many times do we have to say it before it gets through to you?

You demand evidence for humans having common ancestors with apes; present any actual evidence of your claim, that humans were created.

(May 19, 2012 at 5:50 pm)Abishalom Wrote:

(May 19, 2012 at 5:47 pm)Tobie Wrote: The genetic similarity for one. The fossil record is another. You have the internet. Use it.

I'm well of aware of what scientist claim with regards to the "evolution of apes to humans" and the alleged evidence. My point is that this "evidence" is not consistent with said claim.

We're just trembling at your assertions!

(May 19, 2012 at 5:56 pm)Tobie Wrote:

(May 19, 2012 at 5:50 pm)Abishalom Wrote: I'm well of aware of what scientist claim with regards to the "evolution of apes to humans" and the alleged evidence. My point is that this "evidence" is not consistent with said claim.

Yes it is. How many times do we have to say it before it gets through to you?

You demand evidence for humans having common ancestors with apes; present any actual evidence of your claim, that humans were created.

Actually I never "demanded" anything. You just claimed that there was "mountains of evidence" even though you agreed with me that science had not and could not prove said claim. So we'll just leave it at that.

Quote:Who domesticated apes?

Judging by the stupidity and barbarism of religious fuckheads....no one.

But one branch did evolve into us.

To everyone who believes that is a wolf, please look again.