You know, the more and more Stevie posts the more and more I start to hear TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO

(August 2, 2012 at 8:35 pm)catfish Wrote: boo fuckin hoo

whata bunch of crybabies.

The only crybabies on here are christians who cannot accept that we don't believe in their invisible sky daddy.

We were fine before you all came along, and we'll be still fine when you all fuck off.

Therefore your presence here = 0.

I love a whiny rant...

That was not a rant, but a statement of fact.

(August 2, 2012 at 8:30 pm)padraic Wrote: I have reported your homophobic insult:not acceptable.

let's not get too high and mighty ... remember this? what exactly did you mean by my "kind"?

(April 28, 2012 at 8:54 pm)padraic Wrote: Yes, my bad,I responded to your belligerent defensiveness,which annoyed me; I REALLY don't care about you or your kind.

(bolding and italics, mine)

Quote:let's not get too high and mighty ... remember this? what exactly did you mean by my "kind"?

Tu quoque/appeal to hypocrisy. Fuck you.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Quote:Tu quoque (play /tuːˈkwoʊkwiː/),[1] (Latin for "you, too" or "you, also") or the appeal to hypocrisy, is a logical fallacy that attempts to discredit the opponent's position by asserting the opponent's failure to act consistently in accordance with that position; it attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. This dismisses someone's point of view based on criticism of the person's inconsistency, and not the position presented.[2] Thus, it is a form of the ad hominem argument.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

bigot

(August 2, 2012 at 9:46 pm)jackman Wrote: bigot

Why? I simply pointed out a logical fallacy in your post, and told you to go fuck yourself [because you missed the point. ]

Perhaps instead of attacking me, first have a go at grasping the tu quoque fallacy.

Then perhaps explain how my assertion that homophobic insults are unacceptable is wrong. (perhaps read forum rules)

(August 2, 2012 at 9:56 pm)padraic Wrote:

(August 2, 2012 at 9:46 pm)jackman Wrote: bigot

Why? I simply pointed out a logical fallacy in your post, and told you to go fuck yourself [because you missed the point. ]

Perhaps instead of attacking me, first have a go at grasping the tu quoque fallacy.

Then perhaps explain how my assertion that homophobic insults are unacceptable is wrong. (perhaps read forum rules)

why? because until you answer what your meaning was, i took it as you being a bigot, then and now. i disregarded the "fuck you", considering the source. and i was not attacking you, i was asking a question that i wanted clarified, that i thought was relevant.

fuck a fallacy, you're evading a direct question. btw, i know what tu quoque is without you pasting the definition, if for no other reason than you type it in replies to people on here about 20 times a day.

homophobic insults *are* wrong, i have no problem with calling someone out for using them. however, if a bigot is the one doing it, i think he needs to be called on that.

Quote:fuck a fallacy

What?

Quote: btw, i know what tu quoque is without you pasting the definition

You have just demonstrated you do not understand.


Stevie said 'fuck off you queer" .That is unacceptable and I said so. The end.

Quote:you're evading a direct question

I'm evading nothing; I'm ignoring it as irrelevant. I'm sorry if I've expressed myself poorly, I've done my best. I'm mildly disappointed that you think poorly of me,but I'll manage to live with the disappointment.


I have nothing further to say on this topic.