(August 11, 2012 at 10:13 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote:

(August 11, 2012 at 9:46 pm)Shell B Wrote: Yeah, because they are by necessity both a mushroom slap and a teabag.

Only if time travel is possible in the future and an 80 year old doppelganger of myself has been causing mischief without my knowledge.

---

(August 11, 2012 at 9:46 pm)Napoleon Wrote: Sorry I can't find it, do you wan't to get the magnifying glass out?



Ah I should really think about doing comedy.

Thats because you're not looking in the right place.
Here, let me help you.
*ziiiiiip*
*FLOP*
*SLAP*
See? Don't worry, the bruise will fade in about a year.

---

(August 11, 2012 at 10:02 pm)Gambit Wrote: Yet you still come crawling to me. Let me just sit back and bathe in my awesomeness. Hold on, nearly there. No, I need some more time to truly appreciate the fucking pure, unadulterated, orgasmic and indubitable prouesses sexuelles, up in here.

Oh right?
Let us know when you're done picturing a neutered pit-bull then won't you?

You make me laugh a so hard I think I a pee myself. Too much the funny. How is it you young people say it, "laughing out loudly"? Indeed.

[Note to admins: normally I would cut such a long post down to the part I wanted to address. But since this entire post was so mirthful I couldn't bear to leave out any of it. Sorry.]

Is rape natural? As opposed to what? Supernatural? Unnatural? Artificial? What exactly are "unnatural" things anyway? Humans can't fly on their own, but we can if we use other (natural) materials to form wings. Is that natural?

I'd argue that everything is natural, but natural things are viewed (by society) as good or evil. Rape is viewed by most as evil. So is psychopathy, sociopathy, etc. I think most people use the word "unnatural" as a placeholder for "evil", since they operate under the assumption that most people are "good", and therefore being "good" is a natural state. For a moral relativist such as myself, that argument is baseless. There is no "good" and "evil", and there is no "unnatural". The word "natural" is superfluous; it applies to everything that exists.

(August 12, 2012 at 9:09 am)Tiberius Wrote: Is rape natural? As opposed to what? Supernatural? Unnatural? Artificial? What exactly are "unnatural" things anyway? Humans can't fly on their own, but we can if we use other (natural) materials to form wings. Is that natural?

I'd argue that everything is natural, but natural things are viewed (by society) as good or evil. Rape is viewed by most as evil. So is psychopathy, sociopathy, etc. I think most people use the word "unnatural" as a placeholder for "evil", since they operate under the assumption that most people are "good", and therefore being "good" is a natural state. For a moral relativist such as myself, that argument is baseless. There is no "good" and "evil", and there is no "unnatural". The word "natural" is superfluous; it applies to everything that exists.

I use "natural" in the moral sense, yeah. I base "good" and "bad" based on a measure of what harm or benefit is or is not brought, and by what level of willingness. Not saying it's a simple matter; it isn't. But yes. I am, in this regard, referring to rape as morally unnatural. Others have their own definition of it, I'm finding.

Which honestly doesn't surprise me. Lots of ways to interpret something.

(August 12, 2012 at 8:37 am)whateverist Wrote: Well anyone who thinks homosexual rape is a good plan for spreading genetic material is a little screwy. Everyone knows you can't make a baby in the poop chute. Leastwise I've been telling the missus that for years and, bless her heart, she still takes it like a man.

Just don't let it leak down over the vagina... that always turns out well.

Best not have her lie upon her stomach afterwards

(August 12, 2012 at 5:06 am)Napoleon Wrote:

(August 11, 2012 at 10:13 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: *ziiiiiip*
*FLOP*

Notice how mine makes a distinctive 'flop' sound.

That's because it actually weighs something.

I'm not sure that even made sense in the context I gave.
I'm also not sure half a milligram is anything to brag about.

(August 12, 2012 at 11:27 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: I'm not sure that even made sense in the context I gave.

I am sure. It made sense.

Quote:I'm also not sure half a milligram is anything to brag about.

I'm sure it's something to brag about compared to no milligrams.

(August 12, 2012 at 12:00 pm)Napoléon Wrote:

(August 12, 2012 at 11:27 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: I'm not sure that even made sense in the context I gave.

I am sure. It made sense.

Quote:I'm also not sure half a milligram is anything to brag about.

I'm sure it's something to brag about compared to no milligrams.

... I guess?

Check mate.

(August 12, 2012 at 12:03 pm)Napoléon Wrote: Check mate.

er... ok?

Silly boys! Arguing over who has the bigger willie. But then again this sort of debate is exactly why we tune in.