Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 5:10 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
#11
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
(November 18, 2012 at 2:30 am)MultipleTentacles Wrote: Atheists, for their part, simply can't understand why anyone would adopt what appears to be an insane idea without any evidence.

Atheists, for their part, CAN understand why people "adopt" the insane ideas of religion. People "adopt" ideas which their parents and other authority figures indoctrinate them with when they are children. The vast majority of christians, muslims, jews, hindus, etc. were inculcated with their religion almost from the time of infancy, and have virtually no choice except to believe what was forced upon them.

Your "Insanity Machine" is simply a self-perpetuating cycle: each brainwashed generation in turn brainwashes their offspring, instructing them that only their religion is correct, and to be leery of all others.

A few of us have escaped from the machine.
"If there are gaps they are in our knowledge, not in things themselves." Chapman Cohen

"Shit-apples don't fall far from the shit-tree, Randy." Mr. Lahey
Reply
#12
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
(November 18, 2012 at 3:34 am)Undeceived Wrote: Common pattern on atheist forums:
Atheist: “The church taught (insert universally-condemned practice).”
Theist: “On the contrary, Jesus taught the opposite. And the church bases its beliefs on Jesus’ words.”
Atheist: “You must first prove Jesus exists.”

Can we stay on topic?

Sounds perfectly reasonable.

Atheist: "The church taught (insert universally-condemned practice). Here's evidence of the church actually teaching that."
Theist: "On the contrary, Jesus taught the opposite. And the church bases its beliefs on Jesus’ words."
Atheist: "Prove that the church bases its beliefs on Jesus' words. For that, you must first prove that he existed. Then establish an independent authority on what his actual words were - the only authority you have now is the church. Then show all of the Church's beliefs can be based on those words. We provided evidence for our claim - you do the same. And currently, you fail at the first step."
Reply
#13
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
(November 18, 2012 at 2:30 am)MultipleTentacles Wrote:


Reply
#14
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
(November 18, 2012 at 2:42 am)Daniel Wrote: Christ himself only taught hell to his disciples, and not as leverage when evangelizing (preaching to the masses).

What a steaming pile of apologists bull shit that is.
Jesus could be talking to martians and it wouldn't matter. If it was put down as record in his holy book of horse shit, that means you people are going to sell it as fact. The truth is he was probably a greasy con man if he existed at all, and if he was, it would be highly likely that he would want to use the fear of hell to get a "free lunch" whenever he could.

Here we have a condensed list of places that Jesus specifically mentions hell. I think it's more than fair to say that Jesus threatened people with hell on a pretty regular basis, and you filthy apologists would rather use less offensive words like, "Jesus reminds us of hell," or "Jesus didn't use hell as leverage," when all the evidence in his holy book of lies points to the contrary. It's in there, deal with it. Your god is a fuckstick douche nozzle.

[Image: Evolution.png]

Reply
#15
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
I don't know what happened to my response, but here it is again.

This is an observation made from a singular perspective seemingly based on one personal experience with seemingly little to no exposure to the people being discussed. Not even basic/recent history was consulted when this opinion was made. Religion aside to me this is the 'insanity machine.' For what reasonable person looks at one or two examples out of a billion and formulates a theory that is supposed to encompass the whole community? Left unchecked I am sure you would happily go through the rest of your life believing this mess, and would attempt to pigeon hole everything and everyone else you met outside of your comfort zone. Minus the hate this is how old fashion bigots got all of their information about people they encountered outside of their comfort zones.

Again religion aside I am speaking from a non-white perspective observing your recorded thought process and behavior and compare it to: Historical data, Personal experience, and Societal identification and condemnation of the observed/recorded behavior. Do you see the difference between what you did, and what I just did? You based everything on a feeling you got from your admittadly limited experience with the subject, (good bad or indifferent) and then formulated an opinion. I took un-arguable fact (Your blog) and identified a given behavior with actual source or reference material that parallels the behavior i identified.
Reply
#16
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)



I hope you won't mind me posting this here, but I originally misread your name as "MultipleTesticles," and wondered, "how many?" (Two is a nice round figure, imho.)



(I need to get laid, really I do.)


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#17
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
(November 18, 2012 at 7:36 pm)Drich Wrote: I don't know what happened to my response, but here it is again.

This is an observation made from a singular perspective seemingly based on one personal experience with seemingly little to no exposure to the people being discussed. Not even basic/recent history was consulted when this opinion was made. Religion aside to me this is the 'insanity machine.' For what reasonable person looks at one or two examples out of a billion and formulates a theory that is supposed to encompass the whole community? Left unchecked I am sure you would happily go through the rest of your life believing this mess, and would attempt to pigeon hole everything and everyone else you met outside of your comfort zone. Minus the hate this is how old fashion bigots got all of their information about people they encountered outside of their comfort zones.

Again religion aside I am speaking from a non-white perspective observing your recorded thought process and behavior and compare it to: Historical data, Personal experience, and Societal identification and condemnation of the observed/recorded behavior. Do you see the difference between what you did, and what I just did? You based everything on a feeling you got from your admittadly limited experience with the subject, (good bad or indifferent) and then formulated an opinion. I took un-arguable fact (Your blog) and identified a given behavior with actual source or reference material that parallels the behavior i identified.

Dude, get help! All shit aside, get help.
Reply
#18
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
(November 18, 2012 at 11:36 pm)cato123 Wrote:
(November 18, 2012 at 7:36 pm)Drich Wrote: I don't know what happened to my response, but here it is again.

This is an observation made from a singular perspective seemingly based on one personal experience with seemingly little to no exposure to the people being discussed. Not even basic/recent history was consulted when this opinion was made. Religion aside to me this is the 'insanity machine.' For what reasonable person looks at one or two examples out of a billion and formulates a theory that is supposed to encompass the whole community? Left unchecked I am sure you would happily go through the rest of your life believing this mess, and would attempt to pigeon hole everything and everyone else you met outside of your comfort zone. Minus the hate this is how old fashion bigots got all of their information about people they encountered outside of their comfort zones.

Again religion aside I am speaking from a non-white perspective observing your recorded thought process and behavior and compare it to: Historical data, Personal experience, and Societal identification and condemnation of the observed/recorded behavior. Do you see the difference between what you did, and what I just did? You based everything on a feeling you got from your admittadly limited experience with the subject, (good bad or indifferent) and then formulated an opinion. I took un-arguable fact (Your blog) and identified a given behavior with actual source or reference material that parallels the behavior i identified.

Dude, get help! All shit aside, get help.

He's already got help.

It offered him candy.


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#19
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
(November 18, 2012 at 7:36 pm)Drich Wrote: Minus the hate this is how old fashion bigots got all of their information about people they encountered outside of their comfort zones.

As long as we're taking my post as fact, did you not happen to notice the time I spent sincerely defending Islam, in a post-9/11 America at war in the Middle East, when I grew up in a Christian, Libertarian family in Northern Idaho? I've about had it up to here with ignorant dipsticks on the Internet claiming I'm racist, or not willing to look outside my comfort zone.

As for your claim.

[Image: anti-gay-protest-sign.jpg]
[Image: protest.png]
[Image: protest.jpg]
[Image: DSC01708.JPG]
[Image: youre-going-to-hell.jpg]
[Image: 6ddb5d8c1b85346f86561983ec02455d.jpg]
[Image: 3673689071_5320cffa38.jpg]
[Image: Screen-Shot-2012-10-31-at-7.32.08-AM-620x439.png]

You want historical? How about the faith-destroying Saint Augustine, the father of the Latin church?

Quote:"God shall send them strong delusion, that they should
believe a lie, that they nil might be damned who believed not the
truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." Some people might
think it unjust that the Omnipotent should first deceive them,
and then punish them for being deceived; but to St. Augustine
this seems quite in order. "Being condemned, they are seduced,
and, being seduced, condemned. But their seducement is by the
secret judgment of God, justly secret, and secretly just; even His
that hath judged continually, ever since the world began."

From Bertrand Russel's History of Western Philosophy. St. Augustine: The first Calvinist.

Look at that statement, directly quoted from the original St. Augustine: "Being condemned, they are seduced, and, being seduced, condemned. But their seducement is by the secret judgment of God, justly secret, and secretly just...."

Translation:

Quote:"Because God says so, and if you don't believe in God you're going to hell for all eternity and you have no hope for anything. It doesn't matter if you know it's the right God because God has preordained that you will go to heaven or hell whether you know or not. Therefore you'd better know, or else you'll suffer in infinite burning pain for all eternity roasting and frying away in writhing agony forever."

Recent history, you ask?

Well aside from the obvious perfect harmony with the Calvinists, who are still quite powerful, let's look at "recent" history.

The "young earth Creationists" believe that "When the Bible and science disagree, they consider science to be pseudoscience—no matter how many learned men espouse it. They believe that this maxim applies: 'They have rejected the word of the Lord. Are they so wise after all?'" (Explore Your Faith by Ed Strauss) In other words:

Quote:"You can't argue with God. Everything I say has the authority of God and everything you say is from the devil. So adopt what I say or go to hell."

And how about this, from the same book:

Quote:By not preaching the gospel, Christians are, in effect, hiding it from those who are perishing. ... Some Christians suggest that those who've never heard the Gospel in this life will be given an opportunity to hear it in the next. ... This answer seems reasonable but doesn't find strong support in scripture. Indeed, the Bible seems to exclude it, saying that "each person is destined to die once and after that comes judgment."

Meaning that the Insanity Machine has the absolute right to say what is truth and what is fiction, whereas you have no such right, because obviously you haven't heard the true Word from a true Christian yet, and you will go to hell forever and ever for no reason.

From the same book:

Quote:He (Jesus) didn't answer that only very good people entered heaven. He said it was impossible for anyone to do so. ... However, Jesus added that with God all things are possible.

Meaning, of course:

Quote:Human: "Where do you get your authority?"

Insanity Machine: "From God."

Human: "How do I know it's the right God?"

Insanity Machine: "Because God says so, and if you don't believe in God you're going to hell for all eternity and you have no hope for anything. It doesn't matter if you know it's the right God because God has preordained that you will go to heaven or hell whether you know or not. Therefore you'd better know, or else you'll suffer in infinite burning pain for all eternity roasting and frying away in writhing agony forever."

Now don't try to tell me that this is just an isolated occurrence, or that "Not All Christians Think Like That." My original argument was that it can be generalized across Christianity. "You just got your sources from one book lol!" One book which I picked up in the Christian book section of a grocery store, with an intended audience, obviously, of everybody. Tell me, mr. marginalized and demonized Christian, exactly how many Christian sources do I have cite before my argument becomes valid? "seemingly little to no exposure to the people being discussed," you say. When I grew up in a Christian family, went to a Presbyterian church, studied in Sunday School, in a country where eight out of ten people are Christian (Pew research). If you would've said I have no basis for discussing Islam, you may have had more of a case. As it is, your views to me are so completely discredited that, at this juncture, I have absolutely no reason to listen to anything further you have to say.

"Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting."

Have a nice day.
Reply
#20
RE: The Insanity Machine (and the Notion of God)
On that fifth picture down I couldn't quite make out team rockets agenda.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The universe is just one enormous 'Soul Filtering machine' Simon Moon 76 15392 September 29, 2017 at 3:12 pm
Last Post: Harry Nevis
  The Accidental Time Machine (SPOILER THREAD) atheist04330 10 3033 July 21, 2014 at 6:26 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Lets compile a list of everything wrong with christ-insanity heathendegenerate 176 38452 March 17, 2014 at 2:43 pm
Last Post: max-greece
  a sickness tricked me christian.. insanity within. heathendegenerate 1 1086 March 10, 2014 at 1:35 am
Last Post: Napoléon
  God is god, and we are not god StoryBook 43 13871 January 6, 2014 at 5:47 pm
Last Post: StoryBook
  God get's angry, Moses changes God's plans of wrath, God regrets "evil" he planned Mystic 9 7192 February 16, 2012 at 8:17 am
Last Post: Strongbad
  This Is What Xtian Insanity Looks Like Erinome 20 8289 November 19, 2011 at 8:03 pm
Last Post: zip_ster



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)