(December 1, 2012 at 4:14 am)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: And all this, to produce one little study which produces one little result that you don't like.

For real?

LastPoet, you are, officially....the biggest idiot I have encountered on an internet forum. I tip my hat. I didn't think such a high concentration of stupidity was metaphysically feasible. The weakness of your intellect is so profound, it makes reality feel like a dream. There is no way the resounding stupidity you embody could have snuck into our gene pool and survive so long without it being a miracle. The fact that something so deeply dumb exists frightens me. The fact that you can form words astounds me. The fact that you have managed to figure out how to use a computer- it blows my mind. You are not the bottom of the barrel as far as intelligence is concerned. The underside of the barrel is too high for you. Decomposing cabbages have shown more intelligence than you. A sack of rocks will think clearer than you. A floating turd carrying an umbrella and speaking in a Liverpudlian accent while moonwalking sideways up a living room wall makes as much sense as you. If your head could be any emptier, it would be used as a vacuum in the Large Hadron Collider. If your stupidity appeared on my TV, the screen would explode. If I heard your stupidity on a radio, the feedback would level my entire state. If I even looked at you, my eyes would be burned by the power of a stupidity so intense, it would be like a thousand suns. Behind a thousand sunglasses. The revelation of your complete stupidity has become a landmark event in mathematics. For the first time we have discovered a quantity larger than infinity. My friend, I am awestruck to be in the presence of the epic glory that you represent. I am literally quaking in my seat as I consider the magnificence of your presence.

You. Win.

Quite the good try ol'chap, but Sae still wins on the hability to insult.

(December 1, 2012 at 11:40 am)Kousbroek Wrote: Why so interested in my erection Daniel ?
Or are you looking for a piece of ass ?

Mate what you do with your erection my friend is your problem and most certainly not my problem!!

why problem?

(December 1, 2012 at 8:45 am)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: And to be frankly: I still dought (sp) that you are a atheist! With every post you make I become more certain that you are a christian fuckhead troll!

Since you dont manage to deliver counterarguments to the arguments I provide with sources!

Which is typical for most cowardly christian trolls here!

Germans, my good friend. Atheists tend to very much dislike how Christians judge others - and rightly so, as I've pointed out here we Christians are to judge ourselves and not the world at large. But what you're doing is the exact same fucking thing - who the F. are you to judge me or any other Christian? If you don't want us to judge YOU then you should be well prepared not to judge us. I don't really see myself as "fundamentalist" but I still take umbrage at the fact that you feel it's okay to judge Christians who prioritize morality in their lives - it's not OK. Get past it my friend, I don't want to be your enemy.

---

(December 1, 2012 at 2:13 pm)whateverist Wrote: WTF, Vinnie. These aren't porn sites.

me thinks you be on the wrong forum!

(December 1, 2012 at 9:23 pm)Daniel Wrote:

(December 1, 2012 at 2:13 pm)whateverist Wrote: WTF, Vinnie. These aren't porn sites.

me thinks you be on the wrong forum!

Clearly you haven't been into Area 69 then.

(December 1, 2012 at 9:23 pm)Daniel Wrote: Germans, my good friend. Atheists tend to very much dislike how Christians judge others - and rightly so, as I've pointed out here we Christians are to judge ourselves and not the world at large. But what you're doing is the exact same fucking thing - who the F. are you to judge me or any other Christian? If you don't want us to judge YOU then you should be well prepared not to judge us. I don't really see myself as "fundamentalist" but I still take umbrage at the fact that you feel it's okay to judge Christians who prioritize morality in their lives - it's not OK. Get past it my friend, I don't want to be your enemy.

Did you read his posts?

(December 1, 2012 at 4:37 am)Vincenzo "Vinny" G. Wrote: Religion.

Aside from the obvious question of whether religion's claims are true or not, religion is a beneficial psychological comfort.

If it helps return some functionality to your life, a better state of mind, a better quality of life, you should at least consider it as a relief to depression.

Try it for six months and tell me what happens. I'm curious myself.

and his posts in the social darwinism thread????

I have reasons to be suspicious after what I read.

..
.
And now to the "problem" of masturbating.

I believe that sexuality only has limits when it violates the rigths of others/is done without a partners concent.

What Vincent was doing here was a attempt to set a "moral code" for sexuality.

He called masturbation dysfunctional without having any studies to back up that claim.

And dont be affraid to answere, I can be a very nice guy.

(December 1, 2012 at 9:27 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote:

(December 1, 2012 at 9:23 pm)Daniel Wrote: me thinks you be on the wrong forum!

Clearly you haven't been into Area 69 then.

Me neither. Still waiting to be cleared medically for area 69. Is it true that you girls ....

(December 1, 2012 at 9:36 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: I have reasons to be suspicious after what I read.

I didn't say you don't have reason to be suspicious that he's a closet Xian. You may very well be correct, doesn't make it right for you to judge Christians.

Quote:And now to the "problem" of masturbating.

I believe that sexuality only has limits when it violates the rigths of others/is done without a partners concent.

What Vincent was doing here was a attempt to set a "moral code" for sexuality.

He called masturbation dysfunctional without having any studies to back up that claim.

And dont be affraid to answere, I can be a very nice guy.

I don't think you can back up the argument against masturbation Biblically - the closet the Bible gets to condemning it is condemning pornea, pornea means (basically) sex acts outside of sanctioned marriage. Anyone who claims otherwise can't back up their argument.

(December 1, 2012 at 10:12 pm)Daniel Wrote: ...
I don't think you can back up the argument against masturbation Biblically - the closet the Bible gets to condemning it is condemning pornea, pornea means (basically) sex acts outside of sanctioned marriage. Anyone who claims otherwise can't back up their argument.

There's actually a bit of controversy over the meaning of pornea. It's not clear anymore what it means exactly. The best translation of it I've heard is simply "sexual immorality."

Same with the word that has been traditional translated as homosexual. That word isn't clear to many scholars anymore either.

(December 1, 2012 at 10:12 pm)Daniel Wrote: I didn't say you don't have reason to be suspicious that he's a closet Xian. You may very well be correct, doesn't make it right for you to judge Christians.

Drich aswell as Reasonabel Jeff constantly dogde questions - and these were the ones I was refering to.

It was not not intended to be a general judgement of all christian.

Quote:I don't think you can back up the argument against masturbation Biblically - the closet the Bible gets to condemning it is condemning pornea, pornea means (basically) sex acts outside of sanctioned marriage. Anyone who claims otherwise can't back up their argument.

The biblical bann on masturbation wasn`t the subject of debate.

Vincent stated that he had scientific proof of it being unhealthy. And he didnt.