(December 9, 2012 at 12:54 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: Apparently, you don't understand satire.

I don't understand why you lot insist on having "Muhammad" as your first-name/title and then get offended if any non-Muslim correctly calls you "Muhammad". How pointless. Don't get me started on people who call themselves "Muhammad Muhammad" and then get offended when addressed. That would be the asinine equivalent of every single Christian in North America having "Jesus" as their first-name/title.

Jesus Christ that would be really dumb. >.>

Response: I never got mad in whatever way you speak of so I don't have a clue what you are talking about.

(December 9, 2012 at 1:12 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: "Confirmation bias" is something specific. It's a logical fallacy that involves starting with the desired conclusion and then looking for reasons to believe it.

Response: But being bias to accepting the truth is not illogical.

---

(December 9, 2012 at 1:14 pm)Stue Denim Wrote: He's actually right. Skeptic's annotated (which, you know, explicitly tries to find examples of nutjobgery in holy books) seems to say that it's not actually in the quran (no mention of the Sunnah/Hadiths) http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/...mages.html
That's not to say it's not a part of the religion as it actually exists...

No, lets get into the horrible stuff. How old was Aisha when she was married to Muhammad?
That's part of it. Though I wouldnt say that Muhammed is unique in being loved by his followers, yet seen by others as less that impressive (L. Ron Hubbard for example), many religions really...

Response: Muhammad wrote the marriage contract with Aisha when she was 6 years old and entered the marriage contract by living with her when she was 9.

Yet there is nothinhg horrific about it. Marriage is to love and protect someone, so it cannot possibly be horrible to do so.

The truth is that Muhammed is just another wanker seen by others as a prophet, while there is not even a god at all.

(December 9, 2012 at 12:41 pm)Al-Fatihah Wrote:

(December 9, 2012 at 12:39 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: Confirmation bias anyone?

Response: Nothing wrong with being bias, as long as it does not conflict with logic.

Really? Let’s test your hypothesis shall we?

All adults that have sex with children are pedophiles.
Muhammad had sex with a child.
Muhammad was a pedophile.

(December 9, 2012 at 1:20 pm)Dee Dee Ramone Wrote: The truth is that Muhammed is just another wanker seen by others as a prophet, while there is not even a god at all.

Response: The Qur'an and sunnah shows evidence to the contrary.

Woah boy, this thread is about to become interesting, my work here is done.



Edit: happened before I could even get this response in.

Quote: My religion is islam.

Gee. How would we ever have guessed.

So let's see. You are a muslim and after careful study you have come to what you think is the blinding conclusion that your bullshit story was right all along.

Thanks for your insight.

Bye.