(January 19, 2013 at 12:15 pm)Ryantology Wrote: Nobody calls you a god or insists that you are all-powerful, either. Nobody claims that you set the objective standard for righteousness and that human morality is determined by what you, personally, consider to be right and wrong. You're just another flawed and fallible mammal like the rest of us. You should not be held to a higher standard because nobody claims that you're totally perfect and created the entire universe.Who is a flawed and fallible mammal to judge an omnipotent omniscient God, or to tell him which standards are the highest?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 19, 2025, 5:51 am
Thread Rating:
The logical consequences of omnipotence
|
(January 19, 2013 at 2:05 pm)John V Wrote: Who is a flawed and fallible mammal to judge an omnipotent omniscient God, or to tell him which standards are the highest? Hi, I'm Mark. I'm a flawed fallible mammal and I judge you're imaginary omnipotent omniscient god. I exist as a conscious being and have an ability to judge therefore I intend to use that ability on anything and everything I see fit. (January 19, 2013 at 2:05 pm)John V Wrote: Who is a flawed and fallible mammal to judge an omnipotent omniscient God, or to tell him which standards are the highest? If your god falls short of moral standards that the majority of humans on the planet are capable of upholding, then the problem is not with our flawed and fallible mammalian perspective.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! (January 19, 2013 at 2:11 pm)Insanity x Wrote: Hi, I'm Mark. I'm a flawed fallible mammal and I judge you're imaginary omnipotent omniscient god. I exist as a conscious being and have an ability to judge therefore I intend to use that ability on anything and everything I see fit.Your flawed and fallible judgment is noted. (January 19, 2013 at 2:16 pm)Esquilax Wrote: If your god falls short of moral standards that the majority of humans on the planet are capable of upholding, then the problem is not with our flawed and fallible mammalian perspective.1. Why should god care about standards set by flawed beings? 2. It hasn't been demonstrated that god doesn't live up to standards that the majority of people uphold. Re: RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
January 19, 2013 at 6:24 pm
(This post was last modified: January 19, 2013 at 6:24 pm by fr0d0.)
(January 18, 2013 at 8:28 pm)Esquilax Wrote: This is another one of those situations where you're required to actually tell me why my definition doesn't apply Like I said (you must have missed it. Strange as there's just the one point), your definition isn't actually applicable. Take your time digesting that. Atheism, in your case, = ignorance. No insult intended. (January 19, 2013 at 6:24 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Like I said (you must have missed it. Strange as there's just the one point), your definition isn't actually applicable. Take your time digesting that. He asked you why it isn't applicable. "It isn't applicable because it isn't applicable." Yeah, that doesn't work.
I march against the Asagods
To bring the end of time. I am pure and endless pain And Surtr is my name. See me rise, the mighty Surt, Destroyer of the universe. Bringer of flames and endless hurt Scorcher of men and Earth. (January 19, 2013 at 2:49 pm)John V Wrote: 1. Why should god care about standards set by flawed beings? Because, for some reason, those flawed standards are more moral than the ones set up by our perfect creator. Quote:2. It hasn't been demonstrated that god doesn't live up to standards that the majority of people uphold. All that murder and genocide in the bible sort of hint at that. Quote:Like I said (you must have missed it. Strange as there's just the one point), your definition isn't actually applicable. Take your time digesting that. Atheism, in your case, = ignorance. No insult intended. You're doing that opinion thing again. All you've done is repeated your initial claim, not supported it in any way. Until you can support it, I don't give much of a shit as to whether or not you believe my definition is applicable or not. Take your time digesting that. Theism, in your case= an inflated sense of the worth of your opinions. Some insult intended. Just a little bit. ![]()
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
January 20, 2013 at 1:23 am
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2013 at 1:23 am by Ryantology.)
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 23 Guest(s)