Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 31, 2026, 6:08 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Believing in creationism is a sin
#41
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
(March 16, 2013 at 9:38 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Question is, how much of their undoubted credited work is based on their creationist beliefs? For example, Sir Isaac Newton was, among many things, a firm believer in alchemy, yet it is his contributions to physics and mathematics which have stood the test of time.

I don't think there is much science anywhere based on creationist beliefs because I don't think they are true. But I also think that people that make blanket statements like "all creationists are backwater fundamentalists from Louisiana with IQ's of 94" technically, that isn't true. 5% of the science community is Young Earth Creationist.
Reply
#42
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
Clearly, then, they don't let their beliefs get in the way of their work. Admirable.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#43
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
(March 16, 2013 at 9:47 pm)jstrodel Wrote: 5% of the science community is Young Earth Creationist.
I think you'll find near 100% of those YEC "scientists" are in scientific disciplines that have nothing to do with astronomy/physics.

The same thing happens with Global Warming being attributed to Anthropogenic means. Well over 90% of scientists believe that global warming is anthropogenic; however if you look at those who are specifically involved in climate related science the "consensus" soon dissolves.
Reply
#44
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
(March 16, 2013 at 10:45 pm)Aractus Wrote:
(March 16, 2013 at 9:47 pm)jstrodel Wrote: 5% of the science community is Young Earth Creationist.
I think you'll find near 100% of those YEC "scientists" are in scientific disciplines that have nothing to do with astronomy/physics.

The same thing happens with Global Warming being attributed to Anthropogenic means. Well over 90% of scientists believe that global warming is anthropogenic; however if you look at those who are specifically involved in climate related science the "consensus" soon dissolves.

When people argue that "90% of scientists believe in Anthropogenic climate change", they are committing the logical fallacy of appealing to the majority. In all arguments of this type, we need to base our arguments on the scientific evidence at hand. Whether or not a majority of scientists believe that for example; anthropogenic climate change is true could be wrong, if the scientific evidence does not support it.

As far as I know the scientific evidence does support the hypothesis of anthropogenic climate change.
undefined
Reply
#45
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
But most people can't evaluate the evidence at hand.
Reply
#46
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply
#47
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
(March 16, 2013 at 11:31 pm)jstrodel Wrote: But most people can't evaluate the evidence at hand.

The pot calling the kettle black i see.
undefined
Reply
#48
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
As an aside, wouldn't believers be more willing to trust the idea that humans are causing global warming, perhaps on a level that might endanger human existence? "Ruining the Earth" and all of that?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#49
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
(March 17, 2013 at 9:42 am)Tonus Wrote: As an aside, wouldn't believers be more willing to trust the idea that humans are causing global warming, perhaps on a level that might endanger human existence? "Ruining the Earth" and all of that?

Depends on the believer, really. I'm sure we've all heard of that American politician (his name escapes me) who stood up in congress and said that discussing manmade global warming is pointless, because only god is able to destroy the world. Which always struck me as somewhat odd; christians are generally willing to accept that they are tainted with sin, flawed and inherently low individuals that can only be saved by constant obeisance to the creator, but for some reason those exact same people find the idea that they could damage the environment ridiculous.

They're members of a species that was able to go against god in the infancy of humanity when there was only two of them, and individual members are able to go against god's will in droves every day just by holding different beliefs, but harming the planet? Impossible.
Reply
#50
RE: Believing in creationism is a sin
(March 16, 2013 at 8:53 pm)Stimbo Wrote: That's called creative interpretation, GC. Or "making shit up and adding it to the bible".

Really, scriptures say Adam and Eve had many sons and daughters. The interpretation that Eve's sons Cain and Able had sex with her is disturbing, when someone uses such interpretation to degrade God's word, especially when scripture tells us different. The kid needs to read scripture before making such baseless accusations, wouldn't you agree.
As far as Gen.1:1, I quoted it, so how is that making up anything, how do you see it read? Please do not say it did not happen, the Nerd was making a statement from the assumption God created, so that's where this stands.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Sin and death LinuxGal 35 11604 December 11, 2023 at 8:32 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Is the Afro-Asiatic linguistics incompatible with Young-Earth Creationism? FlatAssembler 17 5840 July 13, 2023 at 5:45 pm
Last Post: FlatAssembler
  the nature of sin Drich 137 49687 August 11, 2020 at 6:51 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Creationism and Ignorance vulcanlogician 273 104373 May 23, 2018 at 3:03 am
Last Post: Amarok
  And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more. vorlon13 14 5540 August 1, 2017 at 2:54 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Sin and the Blame Game LadyForCamus 115 52851 June 20, 2017 at 7:37 pm
Last Post: Huggy Bear
  Without the Shedding of Blood There is No Remission of Sin Rhondazvous 231 108231 June 4, 2017 at 9:31 am
Last Post: Zenith
  Why Lust is bad, not gonna use "sin" reason but logical reason Rispri 27 9940 March 4, 2017 at 7:38 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  Question for Christians regarding elimination of Sin ErGingerbreadMandude 11 4960 January 29, 2017 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: The Wise Joker
  Creationism out in Youngstown brewer 17 5900 September 25, 2016 at 7:48 am
Last Post: c172



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)