In think your math is a little off, catfish.

(April 26, 2013 at 2:18 pm)apophenia Wrote:


I ain't fallin' for no banana in my tail pipe!

Leave it to you to find the sex angle in a car joke.

(May 4, 2013 at 1:53 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Stupid in the most basic usage of the term stupid. That's how. Nothing complex. Smack your head on the desk stupid.

You still aren't getting this whole "contempt is not an answer," thing, are you?

I'm not allowed to do it but atheists are you mean Esq?

What's your problem with saying that you don't understand?

Here let me help.

man walks into a tree

Ryan comes out with his own idiotic (I choose the word carefully) theory that he then states his struggle with.

It's like he dug a hole outside his front door and wonders why he falls down it every time he leaves his house.

(April 26, 2013 at 1:47 pm)missluckie26 Wrote: Why you gotta? I just vomitted in my mouth a little. That's not right! Nuh uh uhhhh nuh uh

Whats wrong with battered sausage?

(May 5, 2013 at 5:58 am)fr0d0 Wrote: I'm not allowed to do it but atheists are you mean Esq?

What's your problem with saying that you don't understand?

Here let me help.

man walks into a tree

Ryan comes out with his own idiotic (I choose the word carefully) theory that he then states his struggle with.

It's like he dug a hole outside his front door and wonders why he falls down it every time he leaves his house.

I don't understand what your issue is, only that you clearly don't understand a damn thing Ryan wrote to begin with. Why not just state your contention plainly?

Hence this thread Esq. Theists understand the idiocy here. You don't.

(May 5, 2013 at 6:49 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Hence this thread Esq. Theists understand the idiocy here. You don't.

Consider a number of alternatives: one is that you're simply not expressing yourself well enough. Another is that you're misunderstanding Ryan's original post. A third is that you see something idiotic there when really it's a fairly important point. If you'd actually present a case instead of sneering like an arrogant so and so, I might be able to divine which it is, and present a counterargument. But if you continue with these one sentence scoffing dismissals, nobody can tell. You aren't engaging in anything, you're just asserting that something's dumb because you say it is.

(May 5, 2013 at 7:02 am)Esquilax Wrote:

(May 5, 2013 at 6:49 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Hence this thread Esq. Theists understand the idiocy here. You don't.

Consider a number of alternatives: one is that you're simply not expressing yourself well enough. Another is that you're misunderstanding Ryan's original post. A third is that you see something idiotic there when really it's a fairly important point. If you'd actually present a case instead of sneering like an arrogant so and so, I might be able to divine which it is, and present a counterargument. But if you continue with these one sentence scoffing dismissals, nobody can tell. You aren't engaging in anything, you're just asserting that something's dumb because you say it is.

I think that's more fr0d0 than this topic in particular. He tends to answer things that way regardless of the issue.

I thought I'd explained the problem thoroughly, enough to suck all of the humour out of it now.

As a rule, I don't usually like explaining the obvious. if you can't get the utter basics then trying to explain that to get to the more complex stuff is futile. Despite this I will usually try to oblige if pushed. Can't I just have some peace in this thread? I can leave the face palming out of the atheists hall of shame thread.