Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 11:17 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science confirms the Bible?
#91
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
(June 6, 2013 at 4:55 am)Esquilax Wrote: science acknowledges that it can't prove anything for which there is no demonstrable evidence, and thus refuses to bother. I wonder why?

Interesting change of tach. So now you're saying it's outside the realm of science?

So now are you dismissing what can be logically deduced?
Reply
#92
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
(June 6, 2013 at 5:02 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Interesting change of tach. So now you're saying it's outside the realm of science?

Nothing is outside the realm of science. If science cannot recognize it or never has, it is purely a form of human imagination.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#93
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
Jesus H. Christ (no pun intended), I'm so glad I'm in Germany, and that's not something I say wantonly mind you.

Nothing against America and all the magnificent magnificent accomplishments she has achieved and great change she brought to the world, but those kind of fundamentalist Christians are few and far in between here and exert far less political power today than it seems they do in the US.

Thank *your favourite deity or principle* for that!
"Men see clearly enough the barbarity of all ages — except their own!" — Ernest Crosby.
Reply
#94
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
(June 6, 2013 at 5:05 am)littleendian Wrote: Thank *your favourite deity or principle* for that!

I do not wish fundamentalism on anyone, but I wish we could legally place all religious nuts on a barricaded island so that they could procreate themselves out of existence.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#95
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
(June 6, 2013 at 4:59 am)Maelstrom Wrote:
(June 6, 2013 at 4:56 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Please prove that Maelstrom.

To you, logic is "imagination". i wonder how you manage to function in life at all.

When religion displays logic in its apparently imaginative beliefs, then you can claim I am held to the burden of proof. Otherwise, enjoy attempting to prove your extraordinary claims are based on anything more than faith. I will be waiting.

Don't change the subject. You made an extraordinary claim that science could one day prove God. This is logical nonsense and needs to be trashed so that science should remain a valuable tool. Please demonstrate the validity of your claim or retract.

And any time you see me make an extraordinary claim, please do pull me up on it.
Reply
#96
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
(June 6, 2013 at 5:10 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You made an extraordinary claim that science could one day prove God

Do you think that after all science has done to progress humanity from the dark ages that if God has not yet been proven there is still the possibility? The only extraordinary claim is the one made where science cannot prove its validity. I am not sorry to disappoint your shallow mind in stating that God is very much akin to leprechauns. You do not believe in leprechauns, and there is as much validity relating to their existence as there is to your God. Think about it. Try to use that brain for something other than keeping it buried in the sands of ignorance.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#97
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
(June 6, 2013 at 5:10 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Don't change the subject. You made an extraordinary claim that science could one day prove God. This is logical nonsense and needs to be trashed so that science should remain a valuable tool. Please demonstrate the validity of your claim or retract.

And any time you see me make an extraordinary claim, please do pull me up on it.

Actually, I think you'll find the real line of reasoning is that science reflects reality, and has no specific bias against god. That is, if your god exists, then one can devise a scientific method by which he could be proven, because things that exist leave evidence, and those things that don't are not only indistinguishable from things that don't exist, they are equally as ineffectual.

You, however, cry out "oh no, god's not a science thing, it's metaphysics!" as if that's a cover for your complete and utter, millenia long lack of evidence. It's you who claimed god is beyond the reach of science, not I: my initial post here explicitly stated my position.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#98
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
(June 6, 2013 at 5:14 am)Maelstrom Wrote:
(June 6, 2013 at 5:10 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You made an extraordinary claim that science could one day prove God

Do you think that after all science has done to progress humanity from the dark ages that if God has not yet been proven there is still the possibility? The only extraordinary claim is the one made where science cannot prove its validity. I am not sorry to disappoint your shallow mind in stating that God is very much akin to leprechauns. You do not believe in leprechauns, and there is as much validity relating to their existence as there is to your God. Think about it. Try to use that brain for something other than keeping it buried in the sands of ignorance.

Science has done nothing to progress theology. It's a different subject, in case you don't know. The scientific naivety of biblical antiquity needs to be taken as it is. That is: no claim of authority in scientific terms. Likewise, as science progresses, we shall move forward in our understanding. If it was Gods purpose to explain scientific fact don't you think we'd have nothing more to discover? Yet Christianity for one, instigated scientific endeavour since the enlightenment? You need to acknowledge these huge contradictions to your position here.

You re state your absurd extraordinary assertion. 2nd chance... please back it up.
Reply
#99
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
How can Science prove something exists when it doesn't exist? Thinking
Reply
RE: Science confirms the Bible?
(June 6, 2013 at 5:33 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Science has done nothing to progress theology

Goodness knows it has tried, however. Theology cannot progress because it is unchanging, remaining in the lowest dredges of human existence where man is supposedly meant to be subservient to religion. When man escapes, what is the church's answer? Evil, sin, hell, the usual drivel purported to make man a slave to ignorance.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 49355 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  How does "Science prove that the miracles of the Bible did not happen" ? Emzap 62 13595 November 4, 2016 at 2:05 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Illinois bible colleges: "We shouldn't have to follow state standards because bible!" Esquilax 34 8093 January 23, 2015 at 12:29 pm
Last Post: Spooky
  Trust the Bible not Science Dolorian 34 8637 October 25, 2014 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Does science prove or disprove the bible Justtristo 8 9635 October 19, 2011 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Whose facts are more out of whack Science OR the Bible? Castle 43 16057 July 12, 2011 at 12:20 am
Last Post: Castle



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)