Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2024, 3:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Refuting Evolution
RE: Refuting Evolution
(June 20, 2013 at 8:05 am)Stimbo Wrote: Ok, I'll bite.

(June 18, 2013 at 5:27 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: The Burak is not half man, he is a creature similar to a horse
What is your objections on that? can you prove its non-existence????

Yes.

Your go.
Where is that proof?

(June 19, 2013 at 12:38 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:
(June 19, 2013 at 5:39 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Of course I should select relevant premises

(June 19, 2013 at 5:39 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: 1- If time is infinite, there must be a time in the past where infinite numbers of seconds passed which is not, so time & universe had a start.

Ignores the finite past/infinite future scenario, but this one is basically okay.

(June 19, 2013 at 5:39 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: 2- As the universe was nothing or something static, something (else) must have started it to be time sensitive, we will call it G.

Physics indicates the universe was never absolutely nothing or something static. The most likely natural causes for the universe are that the Big Bang inflated from a previous hot dense state that went back who knows how long; or that it expanded from a fluctuation in the quantum foam. An interesting thing about quantum foam is how closely it resembles certain descriptions of what a creator god would have to be, such as existing necessarily. It looks like quantum foam can't not exist.
This contradicts with being ok with my previous statement
The universe states must be finite as well
So there is a first Universe state
before it, there was no Universe

Quote:The main problem with your conclusions is that natural explanations can fit them as well as supernatural ones. So far, quantum foam fits the bill for G, and has the advantage that it's existence can potentially be tested.

Brane theory might qualify as well, but I'm not as up on it as I am on QF.
Somewhat I agree on it, but what do you call nature must fit my model for the creator
Proving God himself is yet to come
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(June 22, 2013 at 8:02 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Where is that proof?

What do you mean? It's been proved!
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
Exactly. I gave just as much proof for the creature's non-existence as MS gave for its existence. Ergo, invoking The Immortal Hitch, I proved it doesn't exist. Go me.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
Did anybody found the millions and millions of mutated fossils to prove the UN-intelligent evolution?

Or are you still searching in you S***t?
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
You know necroposting is against the rules, right Scholar?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(May 20, 2013 at 6:56 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: We have a saying in Islam that
Quite the nugget of wisdon there, apply it to your god.
Quote:Let's look into the other side!!!!!!!!
Non-Beneficial mutations must include:
  1. Neutral mutations; which have no good or bad effect
  2. UN-economical (non-sense) mutations; which have an environmental disadvantage and would be unselected by nature UN-selection (after many generations)
  3. Slightly Harmful mutations (That should die after many generations)
  4. Harmful mutations (But don't affect reproduction)
  5. Fatal mutations
To furfill that list look no further then your body
1. Neutral mutations.
Men have nipples that are utterly functionless but cause no impediment.
2. Non sense mutations.
Your laryngeal nerve runs from your brain stem, down and around your heart and back up to your larynx.
3. Slightly harmful mutations
Look down and see where your balls are. The painful part of your body is hanging right in front, for anyone to hit and potentially damage reproductive viability.
4. Harmful Mutations (that do not effect reproduction).
Instead of running through the gamut of potential genetic disorders, I will simply point to your appendix, which later life often becomes infected and in the age before antibiotic would often kill you.
5. Fatal mutations.
Wisdom teeth. Your is too small for them and they often become painful and infected when growing in. Before modern medicine this killed by the millions.


Quote:Evolutionists brained washed you by claiming that all non-beneficial mutations are Fatal ones, in other words "Don't look for them
HOLY Freudian slip much?

(October 24, 2013 at 2:18 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Did anybody found the millions and millions of mutated fossils to prove the UN-intelligent evolution?

Or are you still searching in you S***t?

You want one?
Here is a prime example
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiktaalik
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(October 24, 2013 at 3:30 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:
(May 20, 2013 at 6:56 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: We have a saying in Islam that
Quite the nugget of wisdon there, apply it to your god.
Quote:Let's look into the other side!!!!!!!!
Non-Beneficial mutations must include:
  1. Neutral mutations; which have no good or bad effect
  2. UN-economical (non-sense) mutations; which have an environmental disadvantage and would be unselected by nature UN-selection (after many generations)
  3. Slightly Harmful mutations (That should die after many generations)
  4. Harmful mutations (But don't affect reproduction)
  5. Fatal mutations
To furfill that list look no further then your body
1. Neutral mutations.
Men have nipples that are utterly functionless but cause no impediment
I don't mean that, I mean ridiculous, nonsense that may in the future become good or bad
for example a mutated eye in yous as* ROFLOL
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
How about a nose on your forehead?

[Image: nose-grown-on-forehead_72031_600x450.jpg]
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
-blissful silence-
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(October 24, 2013 at 4:18 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:
(October 24, 2013 at 3:30 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Quite the nugget of wisdon there, apply it to your god.
To furfill that list look no further then your body
1. Neutral mutations.
Men have nipples that are utterly functionless but cause no impediment
I don't mean that, I mean ridiculous, nonsense that may in the future become good or bad
for example a mutated eye in yous as* ROFLOL

Well I took neutral to mean mutations that are neither bonuses or hindrance but merely there. That is a example that occurs in everyone. Another good example is women's breasts as why should a women develop mammary glands before pregnancy when no other mammal does this. Howeveryou could try rreading the other examples I give you.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. Mystic 59 32377 April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Refuting Creationist Claims Part II: Flood-Related Beliefs RonaldReagansGhost666 7 3919 February 26, 2013 at 7:30 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Refuting Creationist Claims - Part 1: Noah's Ark RonaldReagansGhost666 23 11635 February 13, 2013 at 6:27 am
Last Post: Zen Badger
  Need some help refuting this creation argument... DaveSumm 25 10804 January 12, 2013 at 7:16 am
Last Post: Aractus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)