Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 4, 2024, 4:51 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
#51
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
Then he's an idiot. If I could move upwind of me, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Even the dog left the room in disgust. Not to mention a run.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#52
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
(July 11, 2013 at 1:34 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(July 11, 2013 at 1:31 pm)Stimbo Wrote: You'd better tell him to move upwind of me, I'm about to fart.

He knew you would fart, and chose to be beside you anyway. He loves you THAT much!

I would do the same of course.

Even I leave the room when my wife farts, and I love her dearly. Jesus is a glutton for punishment, but we knew this already.

I liked your response though...Christian wit does exist!
Reply
#53
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
Are you sure it's Christian wit and not atheist wit rubbing off?
Reply
#54
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
(July 11, 2013 at 3:18 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Are you sure it's Christian wit and not atheist wit rubbing off?

Chalk it up to just wit, plain and simple?
Reply
#55
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
(July 10, 2013 at 5:45 pm)Godschild Wrote: Nothing flew by me, this has been explained many times on here, yet no one will remember what was said.

Well forgive me for not ever seeing this before. Perhaps I didn't read that particular thread.

So please explain to me how God has no human features when the bible says that man was made in God's image? In other words, God created man to look just like him. Don't try to weasel the words around to claim "made in his image" doesn't mean that.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#56
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
(July 11, 2013 at 5:18 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote:
(July 10, 2013 at 5:45 pm)Godschild Wrote: Nothing flew by me, this has been explained many times on here, yet no one will remember what was said.

Well forgive me for not ever seeing this before. Perhaps I didn't read that particular thread.

So please explain to me how God has no human features when the bible says that man was made in God's image? In other words, God created man to look just like him. Don't try to weasel the words around to claim "made in his image" doesn't mean that.

God is a trinity and we are a trinity, God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit 3 in 1. Man has a body, a conscious mind, and a spirit, the breath of God 3 in 1.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
#57
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
(July 11, 2013 at 12:19 pm)Godschild Wrote:
(July 11, 2013 at 1:51 am)Michael Schubert Wrote: If I have to find Jesus, does that mean he's hiding?

ROFLOL

Actually dude He is right there, beside you.

There is actually no evidence that Jesus Christ ever even lived.
Reply
#58
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
(July 11, 2013 at 11:39 pm)Godschild Wrote:
(July 11, 2013 at 5:18 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: Well forgive me for not ever seeing this before. Perhaps I didn't read that particular thread.

So please explain to me how God has no human features when the bible says that man was made in God's image? In other words, God created man to look just like him. Don't try to weasel the words around to claim "made in his image" doesn't mean that.

God is a trinity and we are a trinity, God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit 3 in 1. Man has a body, a conscious mind, and a spirit, the breath of God 3 in 1.

This is a good answer to satisfy the demands of the question asked. But because it asks a question within the confines of the Bible, which is a flawed book to begin with, the question was not the best. Sorry, DT.

Instead, we need to ask things like:

Can you demonstrate that there is a god?
Can you show us that this god is a trinity?
Can you prove that he/she/it looks like us?

The Bible should not be used to prove these things, as all that book does is prove that it has words on pages that say stuff.
Reply
#59
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
(July 12, 2013 at 1:05 am)BadWriterSparty Wrote:
(July 11, 2013 at 11:39 pm)Godschild Wrote: God is a trinity and we are a trinity, God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit 3 in 1. Man has a body, a conscious mind, and a spirit, the breath of God 3 in 1.

This is a good answer to satisfy the demands of the question asked. But because it asks a question within the confines of the Bible, which is a flawed book to begin with, the question was not the best. Sorry, DT.

Instead, we need to ask things like:

Can you demonstrate that there is a god?
Can you show us that this god is a trinity?
Can you prove that he/she/it looks like us?

The Bible should not be used to prove these things, as all that book does is prove that it has words on pages that say stuff.

Science cannot prove the existence of a god. Religious people accept their god on faith. I personally don't believe in faith because it is something people hold independent of evidence.

Are you familiar with Aron Ra? He is the president of the American Atheists Texas branch. He made a good point about faith in a debate with bat-shit crazy Ray Comfort.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZ9OyxAiehk
Reply
#60
RE: Bibles Vs. Direct Observation
I actually listened to that a few days ago. He makes some really good points about faith, and it's actually convinced to try and stop using the word altogether for any of my everyday proceedings. The word carries a lot of baggage anyway, so there's no reason to try and break it down between the faith that believers have and the different kinds of faith that non-believers have.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  U.S. Faith based organization sends solar-powered Bibles to Haiti Eilonnwy 23 6478 January 20, 2010 at 10:01 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)