You are so full of shit, instead of answering the vital pointy of Pappy's post, you just took offence.

The Rules Wrote:Staff will take the context of each insult into consideration before taking action --- This rule does not cover attacking someone's argument. It's perfectly reasonable to say, "That argument is stupid", but it is recommended to back it up with sound reasoning.

Try again, you ignorant crybaby without the slightest idea what you're talking about. And try putting me on ignore, bitch


So, let's try again. The point raised by Pappy is:

popeyespappy Wrote:I talked about tetrapod evolution in the fossil record a couple of pages back in response to A2E's repeated lie about no transitional fossils. Of course the ignorant cunt ignored my post as I'm sure she will ignore yours. Shubin's book Your Inner Fish refutes every lie she has told in the first few chapters.

And Esquilax's comment was this:

Esquilax Wrote:So, when scientists used evolutionary theory to predict exactly which stratographic layer they'd need to dig in to find a transitional form between fish and tetrapods, and then literally found one there, it was just an accident? Hmm?

Care to "debunk" that?

(August 4, 2013 at 2:55 am)Kayenneh Wrote: Care to "debunk" that?

Yes please, and I'd like to point out before you get to that that my initial post contained a link to proof of this claim, so don't think you can get out of actually answering, like you have before in this thread, by claiming I have no proof of my assertions.

Get to it, now.

Tiktaalik

I'll do the creationists' job for them: "That's not a transitional form! It's its own distinct kind! There are no transitional forms!"

And thus, we see the grand migration of the goalposts, driven by the scent of bullshit further south...

Alter2Ego Wrote:I distinctly recall reading forum rules that says: "No personal attacks."

Blah blah. You will remain on "Ignore" until my account at this website is cancelled or until I leave voluntarily.

I distinct recall you promised to have left voluntarily and would never come back. now stay left!

(August 4, 2013 at 12:02 am)Alter2Ego Wrote: Even after abiogenesis theory was debunked by Louis Pasteur in 1859, Charles Darwin persisted in speculating abiogenesis theory.

Fuck yeah! The cutting edge technology and scientific knowledge of 1859 proved this shit!

Case closed!

(August 4, 2013 at 3:19 am)Esquilax Wrote: Yes please, and I'd like to point out before you get to that that my initial post contained a link to proof of this claim, so don't think you can get out of actually answering, like you have before in this thread, by claiming I have no proof of my assertions.

Get to it, now.

ALTER2EGO -to- ESQUILAX:
Frankly, I do not know what "initial post" you are referring to. Please provide me with the Post # so I can go take a look at it and respond accordingly.

BTW: If you are relying on a weblink to a third-party source, but you did not partially quote the relevant portions from the source within your post, that will not work. I don't do links.

Here you go Esquilax. I’m on ignore for calling the lying cunt a lying cunt but feel free to use this image of a table copied from Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tra..._tetrapods

Quote:o, when scientists used evolutionary theory to predict exactly which stratographic layer they'd need to dig in to find a transitional form between fish and tetrapods, and then literally found one there, it was just an accident? Hmm?

No, no. Don't you know that fucking 'god' put it there to test our faith?
When dealing with theistic shitstains the faith card is never very deep down in the deck!

Yeah, god put this A2E here to show anyone with half a brain what a fucking joke any faith in god really is.