Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 5:03 pm
(October 16, 2013 at 4:11 pm)John V Wrote: (October 16, 2013 at 4:02 pm)LarissaAnn Wrote: Well that's your choice John V, most people, even atheists remain monogamous with only one partner. Yep, unlike budgies, most people can control their sexual urges if they try.
Oh John, what are you like eh?
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 5:05 pm
(October 16, 2013 at 3:19 pm)Zazzy Wrote: I have 2 male parakeets (budgies). They hump each other all day long. I've tried to tell them that god doesn't like it, it's unnatural, and it will harm society, but they just keep banging away.
But it's my fault- there used to be a red bell in the cage that they humped, but I got tired of "ding, ding, ding!" all day long, so I took the bell. Then they discovered each other.
It's probably not that they're gay, but they're prison gay. They don't ever see any female parakeets, so one says to the other, "Hey, budge, we're not getting any younger, you know."
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 879
Threads: 11
Joined: September 17, 2013
Reputation:
31
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 5:09 pm
(October 16, 2013 at 5:05 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: It's probably not that they're gay, but they're prison gay. They don't ever see any female parakeets, so one says to the other, "Hey, budge, we're not getting any younger, you know." Is this a subtle way of shaming me for taking their sex toy away? I gave them other toys without bells, but they only want that damned red bell. Picky little fuckers.
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 5:12 pm
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2013 at 5:13 pm by Doubting Thomas.)
(October 16, 2013 at 4:11 pm)John V Wrote: Yep, unlike budgies, most people can control their sexual urges if they try.
Really, what's wrong with consensual, consequence-free sex?
Yes, I'm married, and I only have sex with my wife, but before I was married I didn't have any compulsion against a little fun in the sack. As long as precautions are taken and both parties know what the other is in it for (say, just some quick, enjoyable sex as opposed to getting into a relationship) then really, what's the harm? And don't say "because God doesn't approve" because there are countless instances of sex between unmarried people in the bible.
(October 16, 2013 at 5:09 pm)Zazzy Wrote: Is this a subtle way of shaming me for taking their sex toy away? I gave them other toys without bells, but they only want that damned red bell. Picky little fuckers.
Take the dinger out so it won't make noise and see if they go back to humping it.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 5:13 pm
(October 16, 2013 at 5:12 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: (October 16, 2013 at 4:11 pm)John V Wrote: Yep, unlike budgies, most people can control their sexual urges if they try.
Really, what's wrong with consensual, consequence-free sex?
It's probably against his interpretation of the bible...or something.
Posts: 19644
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 5:40 pm
(October 16, 2013 at 4:42 pm)Zazzy Wrote: (October 16, 2013 at 4:07 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Wait until one of them lays eggs... They're both male, so that would be the scientific discovery of the year. I paid $19 for each of those little suckers- if one laid an egg I bet I could sell him at great profit. My wife once got a duck.... ducks are a bit larger than those little birds you have.
She called it Fred, for she thought it was a male.... turns out.... ♀
Posts: 879
Threads: 11
Joined: September 17, 2013
Reputation:
31
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 5:48 pm
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2013 at 5:48 pm by Zazzy.)
(October 16, 2013 at 5:40 pm)pocaracas Wrote: My wife once got a duck.... ducks are a bit larger than those little birds you have.
She called it Fred, for she thought it was a male.... turns out.... ♀ They're definitely male- parakeets are easy to sex. They both have vivid blue ceres.
What did your wife want a duck for? (this sounds like a great set-up for a joke).
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 5:50 pm
Pocaracas just misheard her one night.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 19644
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
92
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 6:03 pm
(October 16, 2013 at 5:48 pm)Zazzy Wrote: (October 16, 2013 at 5:40 pm)pocaracas Wrote: My wife once got a duck.... ducks are a bit larger than those little birds you have.
She called it Fred, for she thought it was a male.... turns out.... ♀ They're definitely male- parakeets are easy to sex. They both have vivid blue ceres.
What did your wife want a duck for? (this sounds like a great set-up for a joke).
Her place always had some sort of animal, usually birds... This duck had no mom, so she took it in, nursed the little guy... turned out to be a little girl... e then released it in a lake where other ducks were... She says she came back there and found her freddy a few times...
Posts: 1537
Threads: 43
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
31
RE: Discriminatory language in the terms of a christian forum.
October 16, 2013 at 6:14 pm
This entire thread has gone to the birds. I'm telling you - it's all foweled up now. Sorry, I had to swoop in on that one.
|