Whether I'm aware or not, that IS irony,correct?
![[Image: CheerUp_zps63df8a6b.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk619%2Fjcincain%2FArt%2520Vault%2FCheerUp_zps63df8a6b.jpg)
Thanks to Cinjin for making it more 'sig space' friendly.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 13, 2024, 8:35 am
Thread Rating:
|
And Hells come back to haunt me
|
Owlix
Worship is for the weak. I'm fond of science  Religious Views: Upon my death I will be part of the stars...... still. Thanks to Cinjin for making it more 'sig space' friendly.  RE: And Hells come back to haunt me
October 26, 2013 at 12:38 am
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2013 at 12:39 am by Polaris.)
I'm much more concerned with getting my work done on a daily basis than a concept of Hell.....live your life day to day and don't stress the big issues that will only bring you down.....I know that is the opposite of what they tell you, but in your case, it might be better to stray from the crowd.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
  RE: And Hells come back to haunt me
October 26, 2013 at 7:39 am
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2013 at 7:40 am by Fruity.)
(October 26, 2013 at 1:00 am)catfish Wrote:(October 26, 2013 at 12:25 am)Owlix Wrote: Whether I'm aware or not, that IS irony,correct? I agree with kitten here. Sorry, Owl. I like you, but no. These are atheist debate forums. Also, somewhere in the description I remember reading that this is a place for atheists and theists to debate. It makes this place richer. I am prepared to get hit by tomatoes... but this place wouldn't be the same without some of our theists (one of them being catfish). Think about it. What would the threads be like? All of you would be stuck with me just cruising the forums spreading propaganda for certain areas of the forums that require ID proof. Why would you want that? Ok... throw them at me. ducks* A debate requires different view points.
Pointing around: "Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, you're cool, fuck you, I'm out!"
Half Baked "Let the atheists come to me, and stop keeping them away, because the kingdom of heathens belongs to people like these." -Saint Bacon 
Thanks Owl, you made me agree with Mr Fish. Now I feel soiled.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 (October 26, 2013 at 8:23 am)Stimbo Wrote: Thanks Owl, you made me agree with Mr Fish. Now I feel soiled. Think of it as temporarily occupying the correct side of the issue with the catfish. He'll swim away soon, we can be assured.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
You can't swim "away" when you're swimming in the crapper.
Could someone please flush?!?!?  (October 25, 2013 at 9:06 pm)catfish Wrote: lol, you don't know my position on the Bible, do you? That is exactly what I've been trying to get you to explain! You claim that there are parts of the Bible that you take literally, and other parts you do not, and that these may differ when compared to many other Christians. You claim to be a 'cherry picker' and seem proud of your selective interpretation. I'm sure you differ wildly with Sword of Christ on your interpretation of the Bible as it seems he is a literalist. He reads Bible stories and concludes that they should be taken literally, you cherry pick which ones should not. I want to know by what method YOU decide which stories should be taken literally and which should not. You must have some mental process you go through when reading the Bible to determine which parts you take literally and which you don't. All I'm trying to find out is what this process is. You are the one that constantly derides us atheists when we use a literal interpretation when debating Christians. Why not tell us how to read the Bible in such a way as to understand which parts should be read literally and which should not? You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Why, why, why does everyone require someone else to tell them what something says?
Read it yourself.  |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 41 Guest(s)
