(November 4, 2013 at 8:50 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:

(November 4, 2013 at 4:11 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Beauty....

[image of grotesquerie hidden]

---

---

If you had a tail and everyone else had a tail, would you not regard tails as a thing of beauty.

"If triangles had a God, he'd have three sides." — Yiddish proverb

(November 4, 2013 at 10:48 am)ToriJ Wrote: If you add something just because of 'beauty' or any other want then it's not really Intelligent Design. Intelligent Design implies that every function of the body has a practical purpose.

I wanted only to open the topic!
Yes beauty can prove intelligent design

How can you explain
Symmetrical shapes of most creatures
Non-symmetrical internal organs

It is not even symmetrical; e.g. left hand is not a replica of the right one, it is a mirror image of it, this proves more the intelligence behind the design.

---

(November 4, 2013 at 8:50 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: If you had a tail and everyone else had a tail, would you not regard tails as a thing of beauty.

Tails has a function for some species to climb trees

(November 6, 2013 at 2:33 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: I wanted only to open the topic!
Yes beauty can prove intelligent design

How can you explain
Symmetrical shapes of most creatures
Non-symmetrical internal organs

It is not even symmetrical; e.g. left hand is not a replica of the right one, it is a mirror image of it, this proves more the intelligence behind the design.

I would have designed it so that it grows back if you cut it off. Allah must be a retard.

Tails serve the function of allowing people to tell "us" apart from "you."

(November 6, 2013 at 2:33 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: How can you explain
Symmetrical shapes of most creatures
Non-symmetrical internal organs

The problem is you can explain these things without needing an intelligent designer and the end result with its impracticability makes more sense than putting an intelligence behind it. What about wisdom teeth? What's it purpose and beauty? All they're good for now is to grow in just to be pulled out by a dentist. Ryan makes a good point too. Why can't we grow back important limbs like the arms and legs? Or that little part of the male body that helps us reproduce?

(November 6, 2013 at 4:15 am)ToriJ Wrote: The problem is you can explain these things without needing an intelligent designer and the end result with its impracticability makes more sense than putting an intelligence behind it. What about wisdom teeth? What's it purpose and beauty? All they're good for now is to grow in just to be pulled out by a dentist.

It is wrong to remove it!
Do You Really Need Your Wisdom Teeth Removed?
Secrets Your Dentist Doesn't Want You To Know

Quote:Ryan makes a good point too. Why can't we grow back important limbs like the arms and legs? Or that little part of the male body that helps us reproduce?

This is actually a proof that it is intelligently designed
If a non-intelligent process leaded to that design of a complicated organ or limb, how the intelligence of all humanity cannot produce a better design yet reproduce lost ones?

The level of intelligence of that design compared to us is ∞ to 0; just based on this fact alone

(November 6, 2013 at 7:11 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: It is wrong to remove it!
Do You Really Need Your Wisdom Teeth Removed?
Secrets Your Dentist Doesn't Want You To Know

That's the first time I heard of that. Is this mainly an Islamic belief or do other religions hold similar views?

If it's wrong to be removed why isn't it already designed to be impossible to remove? It seems like an error in judgment for an intelligent designer to design something that shouldn't be removed and have it be possible to be removed.

(November 6, 2013 at 7:11 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: This is actually a proof that it is intelligently designed
If a non-intelligent process leaded to that design of a complicated organ or limb, how the intelligence of all humanity cannot produce a better design yet reproduce lost ones?

The level of intelligence of that design compared to us is ∞ to 0; just based on this fact alone

I'm afraid you lost me.

(November 6, 2013 at 7:11 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: If a non-intelligent process leaded to that design of a complicated organ or limb, how the intelligence of all humanity cannot produce a better design yet reproduce lost ones?

Evolution has had half a billion years to work on limbs. That's about 166,666 times longer than humanity has been working on the problem - and we're getting damn close.

Some people think it's arrogant to say that humanity can improve upon nature. I say we've been doing just that, ever since the first agricultural revolution about 12,000 years ago.

without medicine and surgery: in nature my impacted infected wisdom teeth would have been the death of me.

just sayin

I'm tempted to post some tail in here.





Oh what the hell.

Muslim Scholar is undeniably correct, as the following tail could only be the work of a god. If anybody else has more pictures demonstrating good tail, you can help support the Muslim Scholar position by sharing them.