Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 26, 2024, 6:27 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Refuting Evolution
RE: Refuting Evolution
(November 4, 2013 at 8:50 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:
(November 4, 2013 at 4:11 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Beauty....

[image of grotesquerie hidden]


If you had a tail and everyone else had a tail, would you not regard tails as a thing of beauty.

"If triangles had a God, he'd have three sides." — Yiddish proverb


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(November 4, 2013 at 10:48 am)ToriJ Wrote: If you add something just because of 'beauty' or any other want then it's not really Intelligent Design. Intelligent Design implies that every function of the body has a practical purpose.
I wanted only to open the topic!
Yes beauty can prove intelligent design

How can you explain
Symmetrical shapes of most creatures
Non-symmetrical internal organs

It is not even symmetrical; e.g. left hand is not a replica of the right one, it is a mirror image of it, this proves more the intelligence behind the design.

(November 4, 2013 at 8:50 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: If you had a tail and everyone else had a tail, would you not regard tails as a thing of beauty.
Tails has a function for some species to climb trees
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(November 6, 2013 at 2:33 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: I wanted only to open the topic!
Yes beauty can prove intelligent design

How can you explain
Symmetrical shapes of most creatures
Non-symmetrical internal organs

It is not even symmetrical; e.g. left hand is not a replica of the right one, it is a mirror image of it, this proves more the intelligence behind the design.

I would have designed it so that it grows back if you cut it off. Allah must be a retard.
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution



Tails serve the function of allowing people to tell "us" apart from "you."


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(November 6, 2013 at 2:33 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: How can you explain
Symmetrical shapes of most creatures
Non-symmetrical internal organs

The problem is you can explain these things without needing an intelligent designer and the end result with its impracticability makes more sense than putting an intelligence behind it. What about wisdom teeth? What's it purpose and beauty? All they're good for now is to grow in just to be pulled out by a dentist. Ryan makes a good point too. Why can't we grow back important limbs like the arms and legs? Or that little part of the male body that helps us reproduce?
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(November 6, 2013 at 4:15 am)ToriJ Wrote: The problem is you can explain these things without needing an intelligent designer and the end result with its impracticability makes more sense than putting an intelligence behind it. What about wisdom teeth? What's it purpose and beauty? All they're good for now is to grow in just to be pulled out by a dentist.
It is wrong to remove it!
Do You Really Need Your Wisdom Teeth Removed?
Secrets Your Dentist Doesn't Want You To Know

Quote:Ryan makes a good point too. Why can't we grow back important limbs like the arms and legs? Or that little part of the male body that helps us reproduce?
This is actually a proof that it is intelligently designed
If a non-intelligent process leaded to that design of a complicated organ or limb, how the intelligence of all humanity cannot produce a better design yet reproduce lost ones?

The level of intelligence of that design compared to us is ∞ to 0; just based on this fact alone
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(November 6, 2013 at 7:11 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: It is wrong to remove it!
Do You Really Need Your Wisdom Teeth Removed?
Secrets Your Dentist Doesn't Want You To Know

That's the first time I heard of that. Is this mainly an Islamic belief or do other religions hold similar views?

If it's wrong to be removed why isn't it already designed to be impossible to remove? It seems like an error in judgment for an intelligent designer to design something that shouldn't be removed and have it be possible to be removed.

(November 6, 2013 at 7:11 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: This is actually a proof that it is intelligently designed
If a non-intelligent process leaded to that design of a complicated organ or limb, how the intelligence of all humanity cannot produce a better design yet reproduce lost ones?

The level of intelligence of that design compared to us is ∞ to 0; just based on this fact alone

I'm afraid you lost me.
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
(November 6, 2013 at 7:11 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: If a non-intelligent process leaded to that design of a complicated organ or limb, how the intelligence of all humanity cannot produce a better design yet reproduce lost ones?

Evolution has had half a billion years to work on limbs. That's about 166,666 times longer than humanity has been working on the problem - and we're getting damn close.

Some people think it's arrogant to say that humanity can improve upon nature. I say we've been doing just that, ever since the first agricultural revolution about 12,000 years ago.
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution
without medicine and surgery: in nature my impacted infected wisdom teeth would have been the death of me.

just sayin
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply
RE: Refuting Evolution



I'm tempted to post some tail in here.





Oh what the hell.

Muslim Scholar is undeniably correct, as the following tail could only be the work of a god. If anybody else has more pictures demonstrating good tail, you can help support the Muslim Scholar position by sharing them.

[Image: D7612546_714_095325904]


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. Mystic 59 32578 April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Refuting Creationist Claims Part II: Flood-Related Beliefs RonaldReagansGhost666 7 3934 February 26, 2013 at 7:30 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Refuting Creationist Claims - Part 1: Noah's Ark RonaldReagansGhost666 23 11721 February 13, 2013 at 6:27 am
Last Post: Zen Badger
  Need some help refuting this creation argument... DaveSumm 25 10853 January 12, 2013 at 7:16 am
Last Post: Aractus



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)