Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 12:07 am
(December 25, 2013 at 11:46 pm)snowtracks Wrote: The seventh day makes no mention of an evening or morning unlike the first 6, therefore, still in it.
So fucking what? If you travel far enough north you won't get mornings for days. The 24-hour demarcations of what counts as a day still exist, and furthermore your fiat assertion that the word day means something it doesn't won't change that.
Are you honestly so full of yourself that you think everything changes because you demand it?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 957
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 12:09 am
(December 26, 2013 at 12:07 am)Esquilax Wrote: (December 25, 2013 at 11:46 pm)snowtracks Wrote: The seventh day makes no mention of an evening or morning unlike the first 6, therefore, still in it.
So fucking what? If you travel far enough north you won't get mornings for days. The 24-hour demarcations of what counts as a day still exist, and furthermore your fiat assertion that the word day means something it doesn't won't change that.
Are you honestly so full of yourself that you think everything changes because you demand it? the days of genesis is an unspecified periods of time. why? because it harmonizes the text with science.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 12:30 am
(December 26, 2013 at 12:09 am)snowtracks Wrote: the days of genesis is an unspecified periods of time. why? because it harmonizes the text with science.
So, essentially, because the consequences of reading the text for what it actually says would render the position you want to believe ridiculous, therefore interpreting it to mean something it doesn't is correct?
You just admitted it. You know what that's called? Spin.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 12:58 am
(December 26, 2013 at 12:09 am)snowtracks Wrote: (December 26, 2013 at 12:07 am)Esquilax Wrote: So fucking what? If you travel far enough north you won't get mornings for days. The 24-hour demarcations of what counts as a day still exist, and furthermore your fiat assertion that the word day means something it doesn't won't change that.
Are you honestly so full of yourself that you think everything changes because you demand it? the days of genesis is an unspecified periods of time. why? because it harmonizes the text with science.
The good folk at Answers in genesis would disagree with you. They assert that the days referred to in genesis are literal 24 hr periods.
Maybe you should go and argue with them.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 957
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 1:06 am
(December 26, 2013 at 12:58 am)Zen Badger Wrote: (December 26, 2013 at 12:09 am)snowtracks Wrote: the days of genesis is an unspecified periods of time. why? because it harmonizes the text with science.
The good folk at Answers in genesis would disagree with you. They assert that the days referred to in genesis are literal 24 hr periods.
Maybe you should go and argue with them.
that's what i'm doing, some are over here.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 9:15 am
Frankly anyone who takes the Book of Genesis as anything other than mythology ought to have their heads examined, because, damn.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 9:23 am
(December 26, 2013 at 9:15 am)orogenicman Wrote: Frankly anyone who takes the Book of Genesis as anything other than mythology ought to have their heads examined, because, damn.
The whole thing is ridiculous not just genesis.
I watched part of the bible tv programme recently, when I realised that some people thought that this stuff actually happened a little piece of me died.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 1985
Threads: 12
Joined: October 12, 2010
Reputation:
24
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 4:04 pm
(This post was last modified: December 26, 2013 at 4:05 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(December 24, 2013 at 6:55 pm)Godlesspanther Wrote: So the creationist does not have the intellectual skill required to determining the difference between "deductive proof" and an idiotic crock of shit. What else is new?
This ought to be fun. What is deductive proof? Take your time…
(December 26, 2013 at 9:15 am)orogenicman Wrote: Frankly anyone who takes the Book of Genesis as anything other than mythology ought to have their heads examined, because, damn.
Why? Fallacious appeal to incredulity in 3…2…1….
(December 26, 2013 at 12:07 am)Esquilax Wrote: So fucking what? If you travel far enough north you won't get mornings for days. The 24-hour demarcations of what counts as a day still exist, and furthermore your fiat assertion that the word day means something it doesn't won't change that.
Are you honestly so full of yourself that you think everything changes because you demand it?
I actually agree with you on this....although it pains me to say it. 
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 4:47 pm
orogenicman Wrote:Frankly anyone who takes the Book of Genesis as anything other than mythology ought to have their heads examined, because, damn.
warped one Wrote:Why?
The alternative (which you apparently refuse to do) is to do something about your functional illiteracy. Since that isn't going to happen, you should see a shrink to deal with your delusions.
In the mean time, have you ever wondered why the only people who believe the book of genesis is anything but a work of mythology are evangelical Christians? Ever wonder why the people who wrote it (The Jews) don't see it like you do?
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
Posts: 957
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old
December 26, 2013 at 10:55 pm
(December 26, 2013 at 4:47 pm)orogenicman Wrote: orogenicman Wrote:Frankly anyone who takes the Book of Genesis as anything other than mythology ought to have their heads examined, because, damn.
warped one Wrote:Why?
The alternative (which you apparently refuse to do) is to do something about your functional illiteracy. Since that isn't going to happen, you should see a shrink to deal with your delusions.
In the mean time, have you ever wondered why the only people who believe the book of genesis is anything but a work of mythology are evangelical Christians? Ever wonder why the people who wrote it (The Jews) don't see it like you do?
well that makes sense, you hiding behind a video.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
|
