(January 29, 2014 at 3:38 pm)TaraJo Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 3:24 pm)Chad32 Wrote: As far as dick size goes, I'm pretty sure most women wouldn't want a huge dick in them. There's only so much space in a vagina, after all. They're not one size fits all elastic fun holes.

You know, those things are designed for a baby to come out of. I think if a human baby can fit though a vagina without too much difficulty, the great majority of penises will fit, too. I don't know if 'too large' is a legitimate concern.

Don't a lot of pregnancies involve tearing. Women don't usually pump out babies on a nightly or weekly basis either. Though I could be totally wrong. I am a guy, after all.

(January 29, 2014 at 11:03 am)Chad32 Wrote:

(January 29, 2014 at 10:59 am)No_God Wrote: I would rather my 3 year old son see nudity and sexuality than violence.

And people think that is weird.

Yeah, people tend to get it backwards. Driving a sword through someone? PG13. Topless woman? Rated R. Then of course there's the double standard between hetero kissing and homo kissing.

I bet there is some fucking church involved in that distinction!

I don't like hearing that women don't like the way their vulva looks. They are all so different and beautiful. Variety is everything in life. I'm a promoter of vulva love and an advocate for eradicating period shame. Love yo'selves!

(January 29, 2014 at 4:20 pm)No_God Wrote: I'm a promoter of vulva love and an advocate for eradicating period shame. Love yo'selves!

I was about to say that "Sexual Shame" is the name of my new album, but I think you have stumbled upon a true gem... "Vulva Love". Definitely on to a chart topper there.

(January 29, 2014 at 9:59 am)FreeTony Wrote: Anyway, I was thinking: Is this a religious idea, or something that pre-dated religion/ is part of human nature? Obviously you've got the Adam and Eve story, so whoever wrote that must have already had the idea of sexual shame.

Clothes probably were developed long before religious nuts became obsessed with controlling everyone's sex life. Or at least that makes sense to me, since clothes had other benefits (at least for those who were living in less temperate climes).

[youtube]E4HGfagANiQ[/youtube]

All I can say is this - if anyone has a problem with what I do in bed.... Don't watch.

(January 29, 2014 at 9:59 am)FreeTony Wrote: A lot of people are very ashamed about having genitalia. It is considered offensive to be naked in public.

The reason I got thinking about this was a documentary on TV about a naked rambler here in the UK. He was walking in front a school and (not for the first time) was reported by a mother and arrested and put in prison. According to the mother being naked in front of a child is harmful ,even when it is clearly not in any way sexual. I thought this was total rubbish, how can a child possibly be damaged by seeing just a naked man walking past. How is this different to a biology class? Or am I wrong, is it harmful? I'm sure I saw my parents naked when I was little and my parents thought nothing of it, but they would have had a completely different reaction if it had been another adult.

I think the reasoning is that nakedness is automatically associated with sex. However I don't think a child would be thinking about this, just the parent. Young children often show each other their bits in the playground (so I've been told), completely unaware of any connotations other that "you are different to me, that's interesting".

Anyway, I was thinking: Is this a religious idea, or something that pre-dated religion/ is part of human nature? Obviously you've got the Adam and Eve story, so whoever wrote that must have already had the idea of sexual shame.

Religion. The first humans had no reason to be ashamed. I myself am not shamed, as I'm good looking and an atheist.