Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 27, 2024, 2:31 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
#31
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
(July 10, 2014 at 9:14 am)ManMachine Wrote: He was a Professor of European Though at the London School of Economics before retirement, he is no intellectual lightweight and I would be inclined to check his sources before laughing at him, he has a tendency to be right.
Perhaps you have a little too much faith in Gray. Of course religion is still influential in the US but you're distracting from the claim, which is that we're no less secular today than we were 150 years ago. Do we really have to go into this and start listing the differences between now and then and the progress that has been made in diminishing the influence of religion in the public sphere? (And don't twist my words into saying there's not still a tremendous amount of work to be done).

Example: No one is beaten, put to death, or put in prison for being a homosexual anymore. But I'm sure that has nothing to do with secularism, right?

(July 10, 2014 at 11:31 am)whateverist Wrote: I don't disagree with anything you've said, Simon. But I do think it is okay to criticize the minority atheist view that gods do not exist. There are plenty of 7's around and many of these seem to suffer from the same debilitating symptoms of fundamentalism as their theist counterparts.

A 7 is a person who claims to KNOW there are no such things as unicorns, leprechauns, garden faeries, or supermen/gods in reality? And you're claiming these people are on par with those who say, "I know Jesus is God and that he will come back to rapture the church" or "I know there is one God and Muhammad is his prophet?"

That's ridiculous. Even the atheist who claims to know there is no god in the same way they know the moon is not made of cheese is on much firmer ground to make that assertion than any believer has EVER been.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
#32
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
The more I think about it, the more I've started to feel that maybe I only label myself an agnostic atheist in some sort of attempt to maintain a false notion of intellectual integrity. I'm starting to think that things like the incredible weakness of the arguments for god, the illegitimacy of all supernatural claims and the tendency for human beings to make up answers when they can't figure it out themselves is enough to conclude that god does not exist.

Mind you, I'm not completely convinced of this. It does, however, seem more and more convincing, and to compare such a conclusion to that of religious faith, which involves leaping to wild conclusions on terrible evidence, is just disingenuous.
Reply
#33
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
(July 10, 2014 at 4:28 pm)Faith No More Wrote: The more I think about it, the more I've started to feel that maybe I only label myself an agnostic atheist in some sort of attempt to maintain a false notion of intellectual integrity. I'm starting to think that things like the incredible weakness of the arguments for god, the illegitimacy of all supernatural claims and the tendency for human beings to make up answers when they can't figure it out themselves is enough to conclude that god does not exist.

Mind you, I'm not completely convinced of this. It does, however, seem more and more convincing, and to compare such a conclusion to that of religious faith, which involves leaping to wild conclusions on terrible evidence, is just disingenuous.

I've already said I don't promise to be an agnostic atheist my whole life, I could as well switch to gnosticism, it happens and there are good arguments. But for now agnosticism fits me better.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply
#34
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
(July 10, 2014 at 12:43 pm)Cato Wrote:
(July 10, 2014 at 10:03 am)ManMachine Wrote: ...Christianity today is nothing like Christianity of the 5 century BCE, but they will never be 'out of people'.

Christianity in the 5th century BCE. That's a neat fucking trick.

I blame pope Gregory XIII for that one, sorry, of course I meant AD.

MM

(July 10, 2014 at 3:52 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: Perhaps you have a little too much faith in Gray. Of course religion is still influential in the US but you're distracting from the claim, which is that we're no less secular today than we were 150 years ago. Do we really have to go into this and start listing the differences between now and then and the progress that has been made in diminishing the influence of religion in the public sphere? (And don't twist my words into saying there's not still a tremendous amount of work to be done).

Perhaps I do. You are right there is no point in gainsaying matters of opinion, although I did post some links to research in my reply in support of my opinion.

Your point about homosexuals is perhaps not representing the argument as it introduces the element of what people do in the name of religion. Religion, or at least the prevailing religion in America at the time did not and still does not advocate imprisoning and executing homosexuals, that behaviour (at least in a Western context) is born of 19th century values. In medieval Europe homosexual relationships were largely ignored, King James I famously had a male lover, the worst he suffered was a leaflet campaign.

Let's not be too assured about what we consider to be secular progress, we still suffer from a values-hangover born of pernicious Victorian morality.

The subject is as long as it is broad, which goes back to your point about tit-for tat gainsaying, it would be pointless and not move the debate any further on. Let's agree to disagree.

I will look into what you say, I will also re-read my books by Gray and weigh any new information up against his opinions. A number of people I know who have read his works find his books better as they give him time to frame his arguments, which are quite complex, he has a phenomenal grasp of philosophy, one of the finest I've come across.

MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci

"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Reply
#35
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
(July 10, 2014 at 9:58 am)Jenny A Wrote: He tells this little anecdote in the first chapter:

Quote:After [a lecture]. I was confronted by a very angry young man. The lecture had not been particularly remarkable. I had simply demonstrated, by rigorous use of scientific, historical and philosophical arguments, that Dawkins's intellectual case against God didn't stand up to critical examination. But this man was angry--in fact, I would say he was furious. Why? Because, he told me, I had "destroyed his faith." His atheism rested on the authority of Richard Dawkins, and I had totally undermined his faith. He would have to go away and rethink everything. How dare I do such a thing!
(Italics in the original)

I'm not sure I believe in this angry young man.

While I may question if this particular "angry young man" is real, I have no doubt there are some out there that take their atheism as a matter of faith because Dawkins (or some other prominent atheist) says so. There are stupid people everywhere.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#36
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
(July 10, 2014 at 6:28 pm)GalacticBusDriver Wrote: There are stupid people everywhere.
[Image: 5ea7bdca0e380defbb39fcebc5ebaf042c2bc987...cd8646.jpg]
Reply
#37
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
(July 10, 2014 at 6:28 pm)GalacticBusDriver Wrote:
(July 10, 2014 at 9:58 am)Jenny A Wrote: He tells this little anecdote in the first chapter:

(Italics in the original)

I'm not sure I believe in this angry young man.

While I may question if this particular "angry young man" is real, I have no doubt there are some out there that take their atheism as a matter of faith because Dawkins (or some other prominent atheist) says so. There are stupid people everywhere.

There certainly are and you certainly can be atheist for stupid reasons. But I have a hard time believing in this confrontation. I imagine the disillusioned young man going home with his tail between his legs.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply
#38
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
(July 10, 2014 at 5:37 pm)ManMachine Wrote: Your point about homosexuals is perhaps not representing the argument as it introduces the element of what people do in the name of religion.
What else are we to evaluate religion by if not by its holy texts and the resulting behaviors of its adherents???

Quote:Religion, or at least the prevailing religion in America at the time did not and still does not advocate imprisoning and executing homosexuals, that behaviour (at least in a Western context) is born of 19th century values.
You should look up the case of Alan Turing or Bertrand Russell and City College, both exemplary of discrimination against homosexuality (Russell was accused of writing in support of it), both the result of the Christian religious mob that was very influential in legislating their morality, no doubt as they still do today, but with decreasing effect. Homosexuality is one example among many behaviors that Puritans sought to eradicate from society--are you seriously saying that wasn't and isn't connected with religion? Even today, this goes on in Christian and Muslim cultures, and the push back, which has been ongoing for over 150 years, has indeed become far more mainstream than ever before; that is the secular influence I'm talking about, which Gray appears to ignore or write off.

Another thing, even the atheist community is larger and more vocal than it was 150 years ago. This is not really a matter of opinion as it is historical fact. Some have even suggested that we are now living in the dawn of the age of atheism.

Quote:In medieval Europe homosexual relationships were largely ignored, King James I famously had a male lover, the worst he suffered was a leaflet campaign.
Sure, this may have been true of THE KING, but not the average person whose entire career and reputation, if not their actual flesh, would have been destroyed.

Quote:Let's not be too assured about what we consider to be secular progress, we still suffer from a values-hangover born of pernicious Victorian morality.

The subject is as long as it is broad, which goes back to your point about tit-for tat gainsaying, it would be pointless and not move the debate any further on. Let's agree to disagree.

I will look into what you say, I will also re-read my books by Gray and weigh any new information up against his opinions. A number of people I know who have read his works find his books better as they give him time to frame his arguments, which are quite complex, he has a phenomenal grasp of philosophy, one of the finest I've come across.

MM

I totally agree with you here.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
#39
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
I love the way they make belief in god the "natural" default for life on earth and if you oppose it you must have an opposing belief.

Their gullibility and ignorance to the natural world around them is breathtaking!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#40
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
(July 10, 2014 at 3:52 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:
(July 10, 2014 at 11:31 am)whateverist Wrote: I don't disagree with anything you've said, Simon. But I do think it is okay to criticize the minority atheist view that gods do not exist. There are plenty of 7's around and many of these seem to suffer from the same debilitating symptoms of fundamentalism as their theist counterparts.

A 7 is a person who claims to KNOW there are no such things as unicorns, leprechauns, garden faeries, or supermen/gods in reality? And you're claiming these people are on par with those who say, "I know Jesus is God and that he will come back to rapture the church" or "I know there is one God and Muhammad is his prophet?"

Nope. I said many of them suffer from the same fundamentalist habits. It makes a difference. I haven't equated them. I haven't said that every 7 will have these issues. I've said many do. My impression is that both groups have a blindness to shades of grey and no ear for nuance. There also seems to be an over eagerness to diminish the best points made for the opposite side, almost a fear of taking them in. Both utilize critical thinking to defend settled positions rather than to follow new leads where they may go.

After all, when it comes to fundy gods I am a 7 myself. I believe those do not exist. I remain open to finding out what else they may be from the perspective of those theists who do not impose a nonsensical, literal interpretation on their experience.

(July 10, 2014 at 3:52 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: That's ridiculous. Even the atheist who claims to know there is no god in the same way they know the moon is not made of cheese is on much firmer ground to make that assertion than any believer has EVER been.

You're using hyperbole to overstate your case and fend off what you don't want to hear. Why do that?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Rational Theism Silver 17 6172 May 2, 2018 at 9:34 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Question Is theism more rational in a pre-scientific context? Tea Earl Grey Hot 6 1738 March 7, 2017 at 3:54 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  The Curious Case of Coeur d'Alene StealthySkeptic 4 1682 October 24, 2014 at 4:47 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  God is love. God is just. God is merciful. Chad32 62 22304 October 21, 2014 at 9:55 am
Last Post: Cheerful Charlie
  If atheists treated Christians like many Christians treat atheists... StealthySkeptic 24 11896 August 25, 2014 at 11:02 pm
Last Post: Darkstar
  A rational explanation for hell? Ace Otana 265 125884 January 26, 2014 at 9:08 am
Last Post: Mudhammam
  The Case For A Non-Absolute Morality BrianSoddingBoru4 20 5922 December 22, 2013 at 8:53 am
Last Post: Jacob(smooth)
  Humanity's Punishment: If it was a court case. bladevalant546 68 25030 September 4, 2013 at 3:33 am
Last Post: catfish
  A rational proof of a time of manifestation of judgement (if God is accepted) Mystic 12 6038 July 8, 2013 at 6:48 pm
Last Post: Mystic
  The Case for Theism Drew_2013 332 161725 May 13, 2013 at 8:14 am
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)