Posts: 7156
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
July 16, 2014 at 1:01 pm
(July 16, 2014 at 12:25 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: Just what *is* the proper sphere religion occupies? Ethics? Law? Morality? Philosophy? Theology? I dunno. Maybe it should occupy this sphere:
![[Image: circular-file.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=edge.ua.edu%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Fcircular-file.jpg)
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
July 16, 2014 at 1:03 pm
(July 16, 2014 at 1:01 pm)Tonus Wrote: (July 16, 2014 at 12:25 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: Just what *is* the proper sphere religion occupies? Ethics? Law? Morality? Philosophy? Theology? I dunno. Maybe it should occupy this sphere:
Ah-ha! But that is a more cylindrical object than a sphere! Checkmate atheists!
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 1121
Threads: 53
Joined: February 5, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
July 16, 2014 at 6:56 pm
(July 11, 2014 at 10:12 am)Cato Wrote: (July 11, 2014 at 3:43 am)ManMachine Wrote: How do you determine improvements made as a result of the liberalisation of religious doctrine as distinct from secularism? You can't, neither can anyone else.
Liberalization of religious doctrine is secularism. There is no distinction.
You just fucked yourself if this is the basis for your argument.
How is the separation of state and religious institutions the same as making something less strict, they are two totally different concepts.
MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci
"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
July 16, 2014 at 7:04 pm
(July 16, 2014 at 6:56 pm)ManMachine Wrote: How is the separation of state and religious institutions the same as making something less strict, they are two totally different concepts.
Please, are you seriously attempting to hide behind secularism's political manifestation to save your point? Gray certainly isn't restricting his use of the term in this manner.
Posts: 1121
Threads: 53
Joined: February 5, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
July 16, 2014 at 8:21 pm
(July 16, 2014 at 7:04 pm)Cato Wrote: (July 16, 2014 at 6:56 pm)ManMachine Wrote: How is the separation of state and religious institutions the same as making something less strict, they are two totally different concepts.
Please, are you seriously attempting to hide behind secularism's political manifestation to save your point? Gray certainly isn't restricting his use of the term in this manner.
That's exactly what he is saying. In the article all but two cases where he talks about secularism he is talking about it in a political context, there are, as I say, two exceptions, one where he talks about secular myths (his comment of secular ideology) and the other where he takes a brief look at some historical secular philosophy, but neither of these deviate from the political theme he is following.
MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci
"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
July 16, 2014 at 9:09 pm
(July 16, 2014 at 1:01 pm)Tonus Wrote: (July 16, 2014 at 12:25 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: Just what *is* the proper sphere religion occupies? Ethics? Law? Morality? Philosophy? Theology? I dunno. Maybe it should occupy this sphere:
Yes, why just stop at religion, as god is all encompassing, it only natural that he has control of all aspects of our lives!
Totalitarianism in it's finest disguise....
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
July 16, 2014 at 9:43 pm
(July 16, 2014 at 8:21 pm)ManMachine Wrote: That's exactly what he is saying. In the article all but two cases where he talks about secularism he is talking about it in a political context, there are, as I say, two exceptions, one where he talks about secular myths (his comment of secular ideology) and the other where he takes a brief look at some historical secular philosophy, but neither of these deviate from the political theme he is following.
Bullshit. You linked a 4000 word essay by Gray. Here are the 140 words that address the politics of secularism....
Quote:Nowadays most atheists are avowed liberals. What they want - so they will tell you - is not an atheist regime, but a secular state in which religion has no role. They clearly believe that, in a state of this kind, religion will tend to decline. But America's secular constitution has not ensured a secular politics. Christian fundamentalism is more powerful in the US than in any other country, while it has very little influence in Britain, which has an established church. Contemporary critics of religion go much further than demanding disestablishment. It is clear that he wants to eliminate all traces of religion from public institutions. Awkwardly, many of the concepts he deploys - including the idea of religion itself - have been shaped by monotheism. Lying behind secular fundamentalism is a conception of history that derives from religion.
Perhaps you should reread what you linked.
Posts: 1121
Threads: 53
Joined: February 5, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
July 17, 2014 at 4:35 am
(This post was last modified: July 17, 2014 at 4:35 am by ManMachine.)
(July 16, 2014 at 9:43 pm)Cato Wrote: (July 16, 2014 at 8:21 pm)ManMachine Wrote: That's exactly what he is saying. In the article all but two cases where he talks about secularism he is talking about it in a political context, there are, as I say, two exceptions, one where he talks about secular myths (his comment of secular ideology) and the other where he takes a brief look at some historical secular philosophy, but neither of these deviate from the political theme he is following.
Bullshit. You linked a 4000 word essay by Gray. Here are the 140 words that address the politics of secularism....
Quote:Nowadays most atheists are avowed liberals. What they want - so they will tell you - is not an atheist regime, but a secular state in which religion has no role. They clearly believe that, in a state of this kind, religion will tend to decline. But America's secular constitution has not ensured a secular politics. Christian fundamentalism is more powerful in the US than in any other country, while it has very little influence in Britain, which has an established church. Contemporary critics of religion go much further than demanding disestablishment. It is clear that he wants to eliminate all traces of religion from public institutions. Awkwardly, many of the concepts he deploys - including the idea of religion itself - have been shaped by monotheism. Lying behind secular fundamentalism is a conception of history that derives from religion.
Perhaps you should reread what you linked.
I didn't link it, it was linked in the OP... anyway.
I have read it and I even went back through it looking for this expanded use of secularism you claim he employs before I responded last time.
I'm happy to look at those elements you think are not political or related to state and church - and not the myth or philosophy sections I have already pointed out. Can you let me know where you think he has gone further than the narrower definition, I'd be interested to see how you've interpreted it, as it is clearly different from what I took away from it. I have read a lot of his works and it may be that I am interpolating information that is not explicit in the article.
MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci
"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Posts: 5100
Threads: 51
Joined: September 27, 2013
Reputation:
71
RE: No rational case for God = increasingly desperate attacks on atheists
July 19, 2014 at 12:11 am
When I was a Christian, I never attacked anyone who ''attacked'' my faith. Or questioned it. Or challenged me. I believed what I believed, back then.
The other thing is, why would I feel the need to attack someone about my faith? Do Christians who do this suppose that God is this insecure little baby, that needs mankind's protection?
Whenever I see Christians 'fighting back,' I often think it isn't their God they're defending at all, but maybe their own egos, and political agendas.
|
