Why are you putting all this goofy shit in the "philosophy" section? Put it in the "woo" section where it belongs, please. Philosophy is for logical arguments about how to approach thinking about things-- not the presentation of random trivia without sensible ideas to back it up.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2024, 12:30 am
Poll: The existence of ETs This poll is closed. |
|||
Extra-Terrestrials are real. | 6 | 40.00% | |
There are no Extra-Terrestrials. | 1 | 6.67% | |
They are demons and they are not ETs. | 1 | 6.67% | |
There is not enough data to confirm or deny their existence. | 7 | 46.67% | |
Total | 15 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
The existence of ETs would mean...
|
RE: The existence of ETs would mean...
August 14, 2014 at 8:56 pm
(This post was last modified: August 14, 2014 at 9:00 pm by CristW.)
(August 14, 2014 at 8:04 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Why are you putting all this goofy shit in the "philosophy" section? Put it in the "woo" section where it belongs, please. Philosophy is for logical arguments about how to approach thinking about things-- not the presentation of random trivia without sensible ideas to back it up. "goofy"? There is nothing goofy about the info unless you are WORKING for them? Or simply ignoring the obvious. Anyone with sense (and I really mean this in a philosophical manner using epistemological knowledge) could make the connections unless you are one of the "Goofy" assholes who allowed Al-Qaeda to fly planes into buildings on 9/11, you better get off your arrogant ass and see the light. I know that we both could be atheists but I do not have to like you! Since NAZIS are also atheists/agnostics in some manner therefore we could be atheists and hate each other. Definately not to respect each other! I do not care about what you think about me and it is my first Amendment right to post the info. As for picking the philosophy section? it was appropriate. I have taken philosophy: intro, moral philosophy and critical thinking as well. There is no other section where ETs could especially associating with the afterlife and refuting "religion"(which is actually a failed philosophy). John Hosper's Propositional knowledge method: 1. p must be true (objective requirement). 2. Not only p be true: We must be believe p is true (subjective requirement). 3. YOU MUST HAVE EVIDENCE for p. 4. Strong and weak sense of knowing p. Ok, now tell me what is random about the vids or my posts???
I need a fifth option in the poll: You are a fucking nutcase.
(August 14, 2014 at 9:02 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: I need a fifth option in the poll: You are a fucking nutcase. It seems you could not refute my evidence so resorting to "Ad Hominem" is your best option? It seems that we also have weak minded atheists who could not debate anything online (and in real life)! By the way, evidence that is NOT 100% proven. I really do not know how someone could change historical data which is known in the past NAZI archives? If the NAZI data could not be disproven then what we have a possibility that some of the data is true. Especially if supported by other data. Then again, some Atheists are my enemies(NAZIS,Communists, and others). RE: The existence of ETs would mean...
August 15, 2014 at 7:12 am
(This post was last modified: August 15, 2014 at 7:14 am by Michael.)
(August 14, 2014 at 7:26 pm)CristW Wrote:The first step in quoting sources is to verify them. From http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2...-new-data/ “The problem is very simple,” said David Sandwell, a Scripps geophysicist who worked on the project, in an email to ABC News. “When you measure seafloor depth you actually measure the two-way travel time of a sonar echo. The ship sends it, it bounces off the bottom, and returns to the ship. To convert the time to depth you need a velocity. If the velocity used in the conversion is a bit too high, the depth from that cruise will be greater than all the surrounding cruises. The particular cruise that created the ‘Atlantis’ problem was a systematic mow-the-lawn type survey in a regular grid pattern, so the resulting depth errors looked like a regular grid.” (August 14, 2014 at 7:26 pm)CristW Wrote: It seems we could connect the NAZI info with some data. It may be that all Biblical references(Flood and other biblical events) were simply events which were later twisted into "legends" missing accurate data or info. (August 14, 2014 at 9:44 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(August 14, 2014 at 9:43 am)CristW Wrote: My best guess is this scenario for the NAZIS: Some Nazis(and their UFO fleets) lived on but were probably protected by either an ET civilization and/or the U.S. government together. Or probably left earth for another planet with their UFO fleet. http://www.ironsky.net/site/film/about/ Enjoy. I did.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
(August 15, 2014 at 1:00 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:(August 14, 2014 at 9:44 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: You should make that into a movie! That's fucking perfect. Except in ChristW's original script, the Nazi's are protected by ETs as well, which means that there already exists an ET fleet out there. Get your continuity straight, gawd!
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson Quote:The existence of ETs would mean... that the bible is a piece of shit. Oh, wait. It's a piece of shit either way. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)