Posts: 1257
Threads: 38
Joined: October 15, 2013
Reputation:
16
RE: For Creationists.
November 16, 2014 at 6:52 pm
Chas, your post above makes me recall the phrase:
"Science falsely so called".
The shoe fits.
Esq, I think I have seen KUSA's dog pic before, and it's great.
Sure, we could still have wolves and dogs together- that would fit in both Evolution and Creation sequences.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: For Creationists.
November 16, 2014 at 9:47 pm
(November 16, 2014 at 6:52 pm)professor Wrote: Esq, I think I have seen KUSA's dog pic before, and it's great.
It is super great, yeah. 
Quote:Sure, we could still have wolves and dogs together- that would fit in both Evolution and Creation sequences.
Wait, what? Dogs are the product of wolves that had been domesticated and selectively bred over centuries; that's one kind breeding into another kind, by any measure. Kinds are still irrelevant to the process of course, but if you're looking for an example that's as good a one as any.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 1257
Threads: 38
Joined: October 15, 2013
Reputation:
16
RE: For Creationists.
November 16, 2014 at 10:31 pm
Good one Esq. You got me.
I could say dogs and wolves can breed, but we do call them by different names.
Posts: 5492
Threads: 53
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: For Creationists.
November 16, 2014 at 10:52 pm
I would like to hear how a creationist would explain a horse and a donkey breeding infertile offspring, within their concept of kind?
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: For Creationists.
November 16, 2014 at 11:40 pm
(November 16, 2014 at 10:31 pm)professor Wrote: Good one Esq. You got me.
I could say dogs and wolves can breed, but we do call them by different names.
Well, that's why the first thing I did was ask what goes into deciding what animal goes in what kind, so I could know where the lines are. Nobody who actually uses the word seriously seems to want to give me a straight answer, however. It's weird.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: For Creationists.
November 17, 2014 at 12:13 am
(November 14, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Most of you believe in micro evolution. So for those of you that do, you must understand all macro evolution is is simply micro evolution that has accumulated. In other words its simply small changes time. Think of it like the gray scale on your TV. Can you point to one block and say this is where black became white? Of course not
Not that I have clear that up on to the question at hand. If micro evolution is true and the changes occur, then what is the mechanism that stops resets the changes so as too stop a change of kinds?
 if they believe in micro evolution they almost must agree over millions of years of micro evolution the species would be radically different. so there is no point of saying i believe in micro evolution just say you believe in evolution.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 9176
Threads: 76
Joined: November 21, 2013
Reputation:
40
RE: For Creationists.
November 17, 2014 at 12:16 am
But then where are all the crocoducks?
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: For Creationists.
November 17, 2014 at 12:34 am
(November 17, 2014 at 12:16 am)Chad32 Wrote: But then where are all the crocoducks?
You didn't get the invite? I satan made them all for bbq last week. damn good eating.
Now back on track
What is the mechanism that stop micro evolution from becoming macro evolution?
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 1257
Threads: 38
Joined: October 15, 2013
Reputation:
16
RE: For Creationists.
November 17, 2014 at 8:59 am
Cheech, the mechanism limiting micro from becoming macro is the genetic code.
Just like your computer.
The pre-existing code allows different programs (genetic variations) to run.
It doesn't allow Mac programs to run on Bill Gates' stuff, which is why the only crockaduck you will find
is an illustration in logic.
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: For Creationists.
November 17, 2014 at 9:06 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2014 at 9:06 am by abaris.)
(November 17, 2014 at 8:59 am)professor Wrote: It doesn't allow Mac programs to run on Bill Gates' stuff, which is why the only crockaduck you will find
is an illustration in logic.
You don't even know your computer well enough to construct a valid analogy. Just saying.
|
![[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-d-3rfdI7nG0%2FTerwtFyFXoI%2FAAAAAAAACak%2F7kFSmHeVrng%2Fs320%2FBumper%2BSticker%2B-%2BAsheville%2B-%2BPraise%2BDog3.JPG)
