Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 10, 2024, 11:33 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creation/evolution3
RE: Creation/evolution3
(February 8, 2015 at 5:16 am)Norman Humann Wrote: I want to read Drich's email to the pope.

Dear Pope,

I was recently made aware of the Catholic Church's position (I am Christian not a catholic) and I agree. I have observed that between the end of creation and the fall of man, there is no time line in the Genesis account. This would allow the whole fossil record that science places under the 'evolution' title quite nicely. Thus allowing for a literal 7 day creation (in that the Genesis account describes what was done from a garden perspective/created to reflect the evolutionary progress of the world at the fall of man 6000 years ago.)

Meaning God created the garden to look like the world would when He knew man would fall from grace. This would account for the city Cain fled to and the wives the sons of adam took.

I have posted this theory in much greater detail on several different forums from Christians to atheist if your interested to see how different people have responded to this.
Reply
RE: Creation/evolution3
"Dear Pope"

ROFLOL

Yep, there's absolutely no way that won't work.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Creation/evolution3
(February 8, 2015 at 1:49 pm)Drich Wrote:
(February 8, 2015 at 5:16 am)Norman Humann Wrote: I want to read Drich's email to the pope.

Dear Pope,

I was recently made aware of the Catholic Church's position (I am Christian not a catholic) and I agree. I have observed that between the end of creation and the fall of man, there is no time line in the Genesis account. This would allow the whole fossil record that science places under the 'evolution' title quite nicely. Thus allowing for a literal 7 day creation (in that the Genesis account describes what was done from a garden perspective/created to reflect the evolutionary progress of the world at the fall of man 6000 years ago.)

Meaning God created the garden to look like the world would when He knew man would fall from grace. This would account for the city Cain fled to and the wives the sons of adam took.

I have posted this theory in much greater detail on several different forums from Christians to atheist if your interested to see how different people have responded to this.

Proper salutation:
Your Holiness -or- Most Holy Father
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: Creation/evolution3
From Hancock's Half Hour:

Sid: How would you write a letter to, say, an archbishop?

Tony: Let's see - "Dear Archie..."

Sid: No, no!

Tony: Ah, right then - "Dear Mr Bishop..."

Sid: No, no, no!

Tony: Oh, well I don't know him.

Sid: No, well don't write to him until you do!
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Creation/evolution3
I don't see the issue. I would address my letter to the Pope with "Yo, Pope! 'Sup!"
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
RE: Creation/evolution3
(February 8, 2015 at 1:51 pm)Stimbo Wrote: "Dear Pope"

ROFLOL

Yep, there's absolutely no way that won't work.

Why not? Isn't he the pope?
Or
Do you think no one can read English?
Reply
RE: Creation/evolution3
Just don't call him Poppy and you should be fine.
Reply
RE: Creation/evolution3
Pope you goat fucking son of a dildo.

Shut up with your crap alright.

Love robvalue
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Creation/evolution3
(February 8, 2015 at 1:52 pm)Chas Wrote:
(February 8, 2015 at 1:49 pm)Drich Wrote: Dear Pope,

I was recently made aware of the Catholic Church's position (I am Christian not a catholic) and I agree. I have observed that between the end of creation and the fall of man, there is no time line in the Genesis account. This would allow the whole fossil record that science places under the 'evolution' title quite nicely. Thus allowing for a literal 7 day creation (in that the Genesis account describes what was done from a garden perspective/created to reflect the evolutionary progress of the world at the fall of man 6000 years ago.)

Meaning God created the garden to look like the world would when He knew man would fall from grace. This would account for the city Cain fled to and the wives the sons of adam took.

I have posted this theory in much greater detail on several different forums from Christians to atheist if your interested to see how different people have responded to this.

Proper salutation:
Your Holiness -or- Most Holy Father

Yeah...

What do you call him when those won't work?

I assumed it would be like addressing a Doctor or Lawyer even if you don't nessarily buy into their specific fields.. You still respect or address their title. Pope, is frances' title.
Reply
RE: Creation/evolution3
(February 8, 2015 at 2:17 pm)Drich Wrote:
(February 8, 2015 at 1:52 pm)Chas Wrote: Proper salutation:
Your Holiness -or- Most Holy Father

Yeah...

What do you call him when those won't work?

I assumed it would be like addressing a Doctor or Lawyer even if you don't nessarily buy into their specific fields.. You still respect or address their title. Pope, is frances' title.

How is it that your responses so often make no sense?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Evolution/creation video Drich 62 9636 January 15, 2020 at 4:04 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Could God's creation be like His omniscience? Whateverist 19 5999 May 18, 2017 at 2:45 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Tower of Bible and creation of languages mcolafson 41 6258 September 22, 2016 at 9:33 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Creation Muesum Blondie 225 35602 October 31, 2015 at 10:30 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Biblical Creation and the Geological Record in Juxtaposition Rhondazvous 11 3882 June 7, 2015 at 7:42 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Creation "science" at its finest! Esquilax 22 7577 January 30, 2015 at 9:11 am
Last Post: Strongbad
  Reliability of the creation account robvalue 129 12654 January 20, 2015 at 3:48 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Creation BrokenQuill92 33 10102 March 27, 2014 at 1:42 am
Last Post: psychoslice
  Over 30 Creation Stories StoryBook 5 2628 January 11, 2014 at 4:33 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Sexual Attraction is evidence of evolution not creation. Brakeman 15 4591 October 20, 2013 at 10:45 am
Last Post: Brakeman



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)