(April 13, 2015 at 12:46 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Let's face it, the argument against homosexuality boils down to nothing more than "ew, gross.," and I just wish that, for once, someone would come out and admit that.

Nah.....the argument against homosexuality really boils down too that it is wrong. Not necessarily morally wrong, but wrong like watching a child try to shove a cylinder shaped block into the star shaped hole instead of the round one. Then frustration and anger set in when the child won't follow your correction.

Don't try to correct the child and you won't get frustrated or angered.

(April 13, 2015 at 1:03 pm)Heywood Wrote:

(April 13, 2015 at 12:46 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Let's face it, the argument against homosexuality boils down to nothing more than "ew, gross.," and I just wish that, for once, someone would come out and admit that.

Nah.....the argument against homosexuality really boils down too that it is wrong.  Not necessarily morally wrong, but wrong like watching a child try to shove a cylinder shaped block into the star shaped hole instead of the round one.  Then frustration and anger set in when the child won't follow your correction.  

Don't try to correct the child and you won't get frustrated or angered.

Are you fucking serious?

(April 13, 2015 at 11:57 am)Faith No More Wrote:

(April 13, 2015 at 2:10 am)Heywood Wrote: What is wrong with developing a treatment which switches ones orientation?

Because there's nothing to treat in the first place.  I'm sure I could find a whole host of detestable traits of yours that we could "treat" if we wanted to, but you don't go fucking with people just because you dislike who or what they are.

What if you want to expand the landscape of potential sexual partners.  You ask a scientist or doctor to develop a treatment that will make you attracted to the same sex.  What is wrong with this?  What is wrong with developing a treatment that would make you attracted to the opposite sex?  Nothing.

I have a feeling that if such a treatment was created, many gays would opt for it completely of their own accord.....and that is what scares the gay community.

---

(April 13, 2015 at 1:10 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote:

(April 13, 2015 at 1:03 pm)Heywood Wrote: Nah.....the argument against homosexuality really boils down too that it is wrong.  Not necessarily morally wrong, but wrong like watching a child try to shove a cylinder shaped block into the star shaped hole instead of the round one.  Then frustration and anger set in when the child won't follow your correction.  

Don't try to correct the child and you won't get frustrated or angered.

Are you fucking serious?

Yeah I am.

The anti-gay crowd would be happier if they just stopped trying to correct the gays.

Fuck me with an iron spoon until my eye balls pop out and I dance naked through the burning streets of Paris with a pair of tights over my head.

That's just for starters. Feed my brain to eleven vampire ducks who just firebombed a banjo factory.

(April 13, 2015 at 1:03 pm)Heywood Wrote: Nah.....the argument against homosexuality really boils down too that it is wrong.  Not necessarily morally wrong, but wrong like watching a child try to shove a cylinder shaped block into the star shaped hole instead of the round one.  Then frustration and anger set in when the child won't follow your correction.  

Don't try to correct the child and you won't get frustrated or angered.

Actually, it's more like shoving a cylinder in a round hole, just not the hole you personally approve of.

---

(April 13, 2015 at 1:11 pm)Heywood Wrote: What if you want to expand the landscape of potential sexual partners.  You ask a scientist or doctor to develop a treatment that will make you attracted to the same sex.  What is wrong with this?  What is wrong with developing a treatment that would make you attracted to the opposite sex?  Nothing.

I have a feeling that if such a treatment was created, many gays would opt for it completely of their own accord.....and that is what scares the gay community.

Who the fuck would sit there and think that they needed to be sexually attracted to something else?

Besides someone that was tired of dealing with asshole bigots, I mean...

(April 13, 2015 at 1:03 pm)Heywood Wrote:

(April 13, 2015 at 12:46 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Let's face it, the argument against homosexuality boils down to nothing more than "ew, gross.," and I just wish that, for once, someone would come out and admit that.

Nah.....the argument against homosexuality really boils down too that it is wrong.  Not necessarily morally wrong, but wrong like watching a child try to shove a cylinder shaped block into the star shaped hole instead of the round one.  Then frustration and anger set in when the child won't follow your correction.  

Don't try to correct the child and you won't get frustrated or angered.

Well I have to say this made me laugh.
And as a glimpse into your mind, priceless.

(April 13, 2015 at 2:22 am)One Above All Wrote:

(April 13, 2015 at 2:21 am)Esquilax Wrote: Or you could go for the more expansive QUILTBAG acronym, which I just love. I think that covers all of us.

What do the U and I stand for?

The U is part of the QU in "queer," and the I stands for Intersex.

Heywood Wrote:Yeah I am.


The anti-gay crowd would be happier if they just stopped trying to correct the gays.

A perfectly condescending response, but also factually incorrect: anal sex is not all there is to homosexuality (lesbians alone show how completely blinkered and stereotypical your argument is) in the same way that vaginal sex is not all there is to heterosexuality, and the assumption that the reproductive sexual act is the only valid one is just that: an assumption.

(April 13, 2015 at 1:16 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Who the fuck would sit there and think that they needed to be sexually attracted to something else?

Besides someone that was tired of dealing with asshole bigots, I mean...

Just because you don't want too, doesn't mean that others share your same values. The bigot is you....because you are intolerant of people who want the right and ability to choose their sexual orientation.

I am dismayed to see two of the people who repped you, despite knowing that at least one of them did it out of an extreme sense of irony.

(April 13, 2015 at 1:21 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:

(April 13, 2015 at 1:03 pm)Heywood Wrote: Nah.....the argument against homosexuality really boils down too that it is wrong.  Not necessarily morally wrong, but wrong like watching a child try to shove a cylinder shaped block into the star shaped hole instead of the round one.  Then frustration and anger set in when the child won't follow your correction.  

Don't try to correct the child and you won't get frustrated or angered.

Well I have to say this made me laugh.
And as a glimpse into your mind, priceless.

It goes both ways.  Gays would be happier if they stopped wanting everyone to believe there is nothing wrong with them.